<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Obama&#8217;s tax pledge is bogus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2011/04/11/why-obama-isnt-serious-about-cutting-debt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2011/04/11/why-obama-isnt-serious-about-cutting-debt/</link>
	<description>Politics and policy from inside Washington</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 21:23:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: limapie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2011/04/11/why-obama-isnt-serious-about-cutting-debt/comment-page-1/#comment-11241</link>
		<dc:creator>limapie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 04:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=6219#comment-11241</guid>
		<description>I saw Ryan on Meet the Press yesterday (4/10).
Ryan said that Medicare will be insolvent in nine years
at the rate that it is on now.  This was one of the examples he used to explain why tax and spend won&#039;t get us out of our grief. Reform must be done.
Ryan was using the GAO figures.    

Well, here&#039;s a place where there needs to be some discussion.  Just letting the people above 55 do things
the old way, and then all the younger ones pretty much
go into privatization isn&#039;t a good solution.

This competition that everyone believes will lower the price of health care (the invoices that doctor&#039;s bill)
is not going to materialize.  

For instance, no one in our state of WI can have an x-ray without one of not-too-many specially certified radiologist hired to look at the film.  Several years ago, the guy that did mine charged me $500 for five minutes work.  The hourly rate was $6,000 per hour.  It isn&#039;t that price now.

My husband&#039;s MRI cost well over $4,000 and the
reading bill for that was $1,000 (for probably 5 minutes work.)   

It is state law that requires this charge.  It is medical schools that restrict the number of radiologists in the first place.  

Economics...supply and demand...this is a gold mine for medical facilities.  

I&#039;m thinking that --just as power and light companies
are regulated---the medical industry has to be as well.
Medical industries are somewhat of a monopoly and they shouldn&#039;t be allowed to gouge the American public beyond what they can afford.  

Privatizing ANY medical is redundant.  Sure the costs
are thrown off the Federal Government&#039;s back...some 
onto the state&#039;s back...but privatizing is avoiding the
one cost that&#039;s even worse than the deficit by 
telling seniors-to-be that &quot;You&#039;re on your own--Good luck.&quot;  

The same goes for this horrible idea of privatizing social security.  What a field day for people like
Romney&#039;s old hedge fund company, Bain!  

You want to have a class system in America...
well...you just fix the federal money ills with
unregulated privatizing.  And if you&#039;re gonna
regulate, then regulate fair and square across the board, none of this exception stuff creating loopholes and (oh)--  You know the usual ifs, and, and buts, 
for the Senator Frists out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw Ryan on Meet the Press yesterday (4/10).<br />
Ryan said that Medicare will be insolvent in nine years<br />
at the rate that it is on now.  This was one of the examples he used to explain why tax and spend won&#8217;t get us out of our grief. Reform must be done.<br />
Ryan was using the GAO figures.    </p>
<p>Well, here&#8217;s a place where there needs to be some discussion.  Just letting the people above 55 do things<br />
the old way, and then all the younger ones pretty much<br />
go into privatization isn&#8217;t a good solution.</p>
<p>This competition that everyone believes will lower the price of health care (the invoices that doctor&#8217;s bill)<br />
is not going to materialize.  </p>
<p>For instance, no one in our state of WI can have an x-ray without one of not-too-many specially certified radiologist hired to look at the film.  Several years ago, the guy that did mine charged me $500 for five minutes work.  The hourly rate was $6,000 per hour.  It isn&#8217;t that price now.</p>
<p>My husband&#8217;s MRI cost well over $4,000 and the<br />
reading bill for that was $1,000 (for probably 5 minutes work.)   </p>
<p>It is state law that requires this charge.  It is medical schools that restrict the number of radiologists in the first place.  </p>
<p>Economics&#8230;supply and demand&#8230;this is a gold mine for medical facilities.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m thinking that &#8211;just as power and light companies<br />
are regulated&#8212;the medical industry has to be as well.<br />
Medical industries are somewhat of a monopoly and they shouldn&#8217;t be allowed to gouge the American public beyond what they can afford.  </p>
<p>Privatizing ANY medical is redundant.  Sure the costs<br />
are thrown off the Federal Government&#8217;s back&#8230;some<br />
onto the state&#8217;s back&#8230;but privatizing is avoiding the<br />
one cost that&#8217;s even worse than the deficit by<br />
telling seniors-to-be that &#8220;You&#8217;re on your own&#8211;Good luck.&#8221;  </p>
<p>The same goes for this horrible idea of privatizing social security.  What a field day for people like<br />
Romney&#8217;s old hedge fund company, Bain!  </p>
<p>You want to have a class system in America&#8230;<br />
well&#8230;you just fix the federal money ills with<br />
unregulated privatizing.  And if you&#8217;re gonna<br />
regulate, then regulate fair and square across the board, none of this exception stuff creating loopholes and (oh)&#8211;  You know the usual ifs, and, and buts,<br />
for the Senator Frists out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThomasJefferman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2011/04/11/why-obama-isnt-serious-about-cutting-debt/comment-page-1/#comment-11235</link>
		<dc:creator>ThomasJefferman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 02:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=6219#comment-11235</guid>
		<description>Obama is even less serious than Ryan about balancing the budget.  Obama obviously realizes most Americans cannot do math and are idiots in not understanding the huge debt costs that are being placed on the American people.  There is already billions paid in interest alone.  
Unbalanced budgets are not sustainable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is even less serious than Ryan about balancing the budget.  Obama obviously realizes most Americans cannot do math and are idiots in not understanding the huge debt costs that are being placed on the American people.  There is already billions paid in interest alone.<br />
Unbalanced budgets are not sustainable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
