<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The $4 trillion gap: Obama vs. Ryan, an apples-to-apples budget comparison</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2011/04/20/the-4-trillion-gap-obama-vs-ryan-an-apples-to-apples-budget-comparison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2011/04/20/the-4-trillion-gap-obama-vs-ryan-an-apples-to-apples-budget-comparison/</link>
	<description>Politics and policy from inside Washington</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 21:23:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ceptri</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2011/04/20/the-4-trillion-gap-obama-vs-ryan-an-apples-to-apples-budget-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-11503</link>
		<dc:creator>ceptri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 21:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=6419#comment-11503</guid>
		<description>Two points:
1) Can you explain a little why you took the 2.4 number instead of the 3.4 number, it seems like your assuming the 2.4 because you assume Obama is not going to let the bush-era tax cuts expire (even though it seems like he pretty explicitly said he would).

2) You mention Obama&#039;s rosy economic forecast, but you did not mention Ryan&#039;s pretty unbelievable forecast
(from http://mobile.nationaljournal.com/budget/ryan-plan-pushes-optimism-to-the-outer-limits-20110405)

&quot;If Rep. Paul Ryan’s newly unveiled 2012 budget is signed into law, this is what Ryan’s economic forecasters say will happen: The unemployment rate will plunge by 2.5 percentage points. The still-sinking housing market will roar back in a brand new boom. The federal government will collect $100 billion more in income tax revenues than it otherwise would have.

And that’s just in the first year. By 2015, the forecasters say, unemployment will fall to 4 percent. By 2021, it will be a nearly unprecedented 2.8 percent.&quot;

I don&#039;t know if unemployment has ever been 2.8 percent.  That seems very suspect to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two points:<br />
1) Can you explain a little why you took the 2.4 number instead of the 3.4 number, it seems like your assuming the 2.4 because you assume Obama is not going to let the bush-era tax cuts expire (even though it seems like he pretty explicitly said he would).</p>
<p>2) You mention Obama&#8217;s rosy economic forecast, but you did not mention Ryan&#8217;s pretty unbelievable forecast<br />
(from <a href='http://mobile.nationaljournal.com/budget/ryan-plan-pushes-optimism-to-the-outer-limits-20110405)'>http://mobile.nationaljournal.com/budget &nbsp;/ryan-plan-pushes-optimism-to-the-outer -limits-20110405)</a></p>
<p>&#8220;If Rep. Paul Ryan’s newly unveiled 2012 budget is signed into law, this is what Ryan’s economic forecasters say will happen: The unemployment rate will plunge by 2.5 percentage points. The still-sinking housing market will roar back in a brand new boom. The federal government will collect $100 billion more in income tax revenues than it otherwise would have.</p>
<p>And that’s just in the first year. By 2015, the forecasters say, unemployment will fall to 4 percent. By 2021, it will be a nearly unprecedented 2.8 percent.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if unemployment has ever been 2.8 percent.  That seems very suspect to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
