Debt ceiling update: tax increases still a no-go

July 31, 2011

First, the outline of the emerging debt ceiling deal (via Reuters):

1) The emerging deal includes a two-step process to cut the deficit about $2.8 trillion over a decade while increasing the debt ceiling by a similar amount to cover U.S. borrowing beyond the November 2012 election.

2) Lawmakers have already largely agreed on caps to annual discretionary spending over 10 years, although their estimates of the savings, $1 trillion, are greater than the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office’s tally of $750 billion.

3) A further $1.8 trillion would be recommended by a special committee appointed by Congress that would make its recommendations by late November.

4) Negotiators Sunday were trying to overcome one of the last major sticking points — a proposed enforcement mechanism, or “trigger,” to ensure additional deficit reduction gets enacted into law. Across-the-board cuts would be triggered if Congress failed to act on the panel’s recommendations.

It seems as if the cuts triggered by the enforcement mechanism will hit Medicare providers and defense, if  debt cuts can’t be agreed on. But it is also important to note that Republican leaders certainly believe that the structure  of the super-committee will be such that it would be virtually impossible for it to recommend tax increases.  This is key because the history of congressional committees and gangs would suggest that tax hikes would be on the table. A GOP aide describes it this way to me:

It has an undefined mandate of deficit reduction but the way that is constructed would essentially make it impossible to raise taxes. Anything scored by CBO is based on current law. Current law assumes that taxes are going to go up by three-and-a-half trillion dollars next year [over ten years].  So anything you do to the tax code, unless it starts off with a $3.5 trillion tax increase, it’s going to be adding to the deficit  … It’s almost impossible for them to touch taxes because if they do, almost anything will be scored as a tax cut, making it that much more difficult to reach the $1.5 trillion that they need to get to.

 

No comments so far

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

[...] Debt ceiling update: tax increases still a no-goReuters Blogs (blog)But it is also important to note that Republican leaders certainly believe that the structure of the super-committee will be such that it would be virtually impossible for it to recommend tax increases. This is key because the history of congressional …Debt-Deal Sticking Point Likely Won't Involve Higher Tax Revenue – LawmakerWall Street Journalall 4 news articles » [...]

[...] Commission coming back to Congress with a package of tax hikes, read James Pethokoukis’s post about baseline budgeting. Because CBO is forced to assume that the Bush tax cuts will expire next year, the Commission can [...]

[...] PDF and his statement to his caucus, that there won’t be any tax increases. The reason why is in this post by Jim Pethokoukis and hinges on the Bush tax cuts, which the CBO must score as a tax increase since they are set to [...]

[...] health insurance program for the elderly — and $1 trillion in revenue increases, …Debt ceiling update: tax increases still a no-goReuters Blogs (blog)(Debt) Deal Or No (Debt) Deal?Reason Online (blog)Debt: Two Views: Tea Partiers [...]

[...] the risk of the super committee coming back with tax cuts…doesn’t sound that likely.  James Pethokoukis has a nice piece on why baseline budgeting is actually going to help us out on this one.  The key [...]

[...] day, is the deal a good one? I dunno. James Pethokoukis — who I generally trust — says that it pretty much makes tax hikes impossible, and while I don’t quite follow his logic, I’ll go along with that. And a lot of [...]

[...] the PDF and his statement to his caucus, that there won’t be any tax increases. The reason why is in this post by Jim Pethokoukis and hinges on the Bush tax cuts, which the CBO must score as a tax increase since they are set to [...]

[...] PDF and his statement to his caucus, that there won’t be any tax increases. The reason why is in this post by Jim Pethokoukis and hinges on the Bush tax cuts, which the CBO must score as a tax increase since they are set to [...]

[...] the risk of the super committee coming back with tax cuts…doesn’t sound that likely.  James Pethokoukis has a nice piece on why baseline budgeting is actually going to help us out on this one.  The key [...]

[...] sour “deal” liberal lawmakers are offering in exchange for insufficient spending cuts, according to reports of this weekend’s debt negotiations in [...]

[...] close” and will probably be a two-step plan that cuts spending by about $2.8 trillion. Debt ceiling update: tax increases still a no-go First, the outline of the emerging debt ceiling deal (via Reuters): 1) The emerging deal includes a [...]

[...] yesterday’s GOP talking point about how “baseline budgeting” would make it virtually impossible for the Committee to [...]

[...] yesterday’s GOP talking point about how “baseline budgeting” would make it virtually impossible for the Committee to impose [...]

[...] Debt ceiling update: tax increases still a no-go By James Pethokoukis – Reuters.com First, the outline of the emerging debt ceiling deal (via Reuters): [...]

[...] Debt ceiling update: tax increases still a no-go By James Pethokoukis – Reuters.com First, the outline of the emerging debt ceiling deal (via Reuters): [...]

[...] the PDF and his statement to his caucus, that there won’t be any tax increases. The reason why is in this post by Jim Pethokoukis and hinges on the Bush tax cuts, which the CBO must score as a tax increase since they are set to [...]