<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can Obama&#8217;s 2012 hopes survive 9%+ unemployment?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2011/08/05/can-obamas-2012-hopes-survive-9-unemployment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2011/08/05/can-obamas-2012-hopes-survive-9-unemployment/</link>
	<description>Politics and policy from inside Washington</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 21:23:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GetpIaning</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2011/08/05/can-obamas-2012-hopes-survive-9-unemployment/comment-page-1/#comment-13006</link>
		<dc:creator>GetpIaning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 23:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=11913#comment-13006</guid>
		<description>We are, by all measures, in the midst of a failing economic recovery. Under these circumstances, Americans expect that policymakers in Washington are committed to improving economic conditions further.

It&#039;s against this backdrop that conservatives are committed to taking capital out of the economy, creating more public-sector unemployment, eliminating effective jobs programs, urging the Federal Reserve to stop focusing on lowering unemployment, and fighting tooth and nail to protect a tax policy that&#039;s been tried for 30 years without success. 

By their own admission, GOP officials have said economic growth is not their priority; Hoover-like deficit reduction is. While advocating this agenda, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has said, more than once, that his &quot;top priority&quot; isn&#039;t job creation, but rather, &quot;denying President Obama a second term in office.&quot;

It&#039;s time to face the fact that there are people who are prioritizing the destruction of a presidency over the needs of the nation. They are willing to crash the American economy, even the global economy, to accomplish this. 

Oh, and senatorseven? Standard and Poor&#039;s says it&#039;s Republican obstructionism and intransigence on economic policies that caused them to downgrade America&#039;s credit. But conservatives are rejoicing over this downgrade and attempting to blame Obama for fiscal irresponsibility. Every time I think conservative logic couldn’t possibly get more blisteringly ridiculous, you lower the bar yet again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are, by all measures, in the midst of a failing economic recovery. Under these circumstances, Americans expect that policymakers in Washington are committed to improving economic conditions further.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s against this backdrop that conservatives are committed to taking capital out of the economy, creating more public-sector unemployment, eliminating effective jobs programs, urging the Federal Reserve to stop focusing on lowering unemployment, and fighting tooth and nail to protect a tax policy that&#8217;s been tried for 30 years without success. </p>
<p>By their own admission, GOP officials have said economic growth is not their priority; Hoover-like deficit reduction is. While advocating this agenda, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has said, more than once, that his &#8220;top priority&#8221; isn&#8217;t job creation, but rather, &#8220;denying President Obama a second term in office.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s time to face the fact that there are people who are prioritizing the destruction of a presidency over the needs of the nation. They are willing to crash the American economy, even the global economy, to accomplish this. </p>
<p>Oh, and senatorseven? Standard and Poor&#8217;s says it&#8217;s Republican obstructionism and intransigence on economic policies that caused them to downgrade America&#8217;s credit. But conservatives are rejoicing over this downgrade and attempting to blame Obama for fiscal irresponsibility. Every time I think conservative logic couldn’t possibly get more blisteringly ridiculous, you lower the bar yet again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: senatorseven</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2011/08/05/can-obamas-2012-hopes-survive-9-unemployment/comment-page-1/#comment-12995</link>
		<dc:creator>senatorseven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 01:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=11913#comment-12995</guid>
		<description>@djdrew103, please put down your crackpipe and step away from the keyboard.  your guy just led the way to the first credit rating downgrade in modern U.S. history.  he will not recover.  and the answer is Perry/Bachmann. perhaps that will be enough to get all the liberal trolls to finally leave the country and give us a chance at real recovery. you heard it here, first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@djdrew103, please put down your crackpipe and step away from the keyboard.  your guy just led the way to the first credit rating downgrade in modern U.S. history.  he will not recover.  and the answer is Perry/Bachmann. perhaps that will be enough to get all the liberal trolls to finally leave the country and give us a chance at real recovery. you heard it here, first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djdrew103</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2011/08/05/can-obamas-2012-hopes-survive-9-unemployment/comment-page-1/#comment-12989</link>
		<dc:creator>djdrew103</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 20:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=11913#comment-12989</guid>
		<description>President Obama has been handed a dead horse in 2008 and was expected to resurrect it...IMO he has done exemplary under the circumstances, given that the American public is NEVER content, the legislative branch has proven to be a red herring, and the economy and financial collapse dealt him unavoidable yet treatable problems.

Three key factors will affect the 2012 elections. T

The minorities will be unchangeable in their votes, they are, have been, and will be pro-Obama.

The wage earners have been undecided in their opinions of Obama, because their general opinion with the legislative branches, Congress goes on vacation for a month while unemployment goes unchecked, and that feeling of discontent bleeds over to the administrative offices of our government.

2012 needs a challenging public promotion to vote. We cannot afford to sit in our homes and watch the elections from the comfort of our TV chairs. 

We need a massive promotion for people who never vote, the get to the polls and do so. America is a miserable example of lazy citizens with only 54% turning out to vote for the presidential election and only 37% for mid-terms. 

Other countries put us to shame and we need to remember just 5 years ago when the Iraqi populace dared to go out under fear of death to cast their vote for the first time in 30 years, as our troops served and died for them to have that &quot;freedom&quot;.

We cannot be classed as a fatten calf when it comes to voting. Far too many claim voting makes no difference anyways, when they forget that the power of the vote is what gave Americans their rights and freedoms, and changed the way those rights were exemplified in the 50&#039;s and 60&#039;s because people DID vote.

Those reasons alone should drive us to the polls.

Then decide just who you wish to vote for. 

Come 2012 though, one of the biggest problems will be with choice.

Just who do the Republicans think they will place on the chopping block for a candidate, Bachmman or Palin? I would not be surprised to see them try to put a woman in for the presidency, just to gain the female vote, but?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama has been handed a dead horse in 2008 and was expected to resurrect it&#8230;IMO he has done exemplary under the circumstances, given that the American public is NEVER content, the legislative branch has proven to be a red herring, and the economy and financial collapse dealt him unavoidable yet treatable problems.</p>
<p>Three key factors will affect the 2012 elections. T</p>
<p>The minorities will be unchangeable in their votes, they are, have been, and will be pro-Obama.</p>
<p>The wage earners have been undecided in their opinions of Obama, because their general opinion with the legislative branches, Congress goes on vacation for a month while unemployment goes unchecked, and that feeling of discontent bleeds over to the administrative offices of our government.</p>
<p>2012 needs a challenging public promotion to vote. We cannot afford to sit in our homes and watch the elections from the comfort of our TV chairs. </p>
<p>We need a massive promotion for people who never vote, the get to the polls and do so. America is a miserable example of lazy citizens with only 54% turning out to vote for the presidential election and only 37% for mid-terms. </p>
<p>Other countries put us to shame and we need to remember just 5 years ago when the Iraqi populace dared to go out under fear of death to cast their vote for the first time in 30 years, as our troops served and died for them to have that &#8220;freedom&#8221;.</p>
<p>We cannot be classed as a fatten calf when it comes to voting. Far too many claim voting makes no difference anyways, when they forget that the power of the vote is what gave Americans their rights and freedoms, and changed the way those rights were exemplified in the 50&#8242;s and 60&#8242;s because people DID vote.</p>
<p>Those reasons alone should drive us to the polls.</p>
<p>Then decide just who you wish to vote for. </p>
<p>Come 2012 though, one of the biggest problems will be with choice.</p>
<p>Just who do the Republicans think they will place on the chopping block for a candidate, Bachmman or Palin? I would not be surprised to see them try to put a woman in for the presidency, just to gain the female vote, but?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djdrew103</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2011/08/05/can-obamas-2012-hopes-survive-9-unemployment/comment-page-1/#comment-12988</link>
		<dc:creator>djdrew103</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 20:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=11913#comment-12988</guid>
		<description>President Obama has been handed a dead horse in 2008 and was expected to resurrect it...IMO he has done exemplary under the circumstances, given that the American public is NEVER content, the legislative branch has proven to be a red herring, and the economy and financial collapse dealt him unavoidable yet treatable problems.

Three key factors will affect the 2012 elections. T

he minorities will be unchangeable in their votes, they are, have been, and will be pro-Obama.

The wage earners have been undecided in their opinions of Obama, because their general opinion with the legislative branches, Congress goes on vacation for a month while unemployment goes unchecked, and that feeling of discontent bleeds over to the administrative offices of our government.

2012 needs a challenging public promotion to vote. We cannot afford to sit in our homes and watch the elections from the comfort of our TV chairs. 

We need a massive promotion for people who never vote, the get to the polls and do so. America is a miserable example of lazy citizens with only 54% turning out to vote for the presidential election and only 37% for mid-terms. 

Other countries put us to shame and we need to remember just 5 years ago when the Iraqi populace dared to go out under fear of death to cast their vote for the first time in 30 years, as our troops served and died for them to have that &quot;freedom&quot;.

We cannot be classed as a fatten calf when it comes to voting. Far too many claim voting makes no difference anyways, when they forget that the power of the vote is what gave Americans their rights and freedoms, and changed the way those rights were exemplified in the 50&#039;s and 60&#039;s because people DID vote.

Those reasons alone should drive us to the polls.

Then decide just who you wish to vote for. 

Come 2012 though, one of the biggest problems will be with choice.

Just who do the Republicans think they will place on the chopping block for a candidate, Bachmman or Palin? I would not be surprised to see them try to put a woman in for the presidency, just to gain the female vote, but?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama has been handed a dead horse in 2008 and was expected to resurrect it&#8230;IMO he has done exemplary under the circumstances, given that the American public is NEVER content, the legislative branch has proven to be a red herring, and the economy and financial collapse dealt him unavoidable yet treatable problems.</p>
<p>Three key factors will affect the 2012 elections. T</p>
<p>he minorities will be unchangeable in their votes, they are, have been, and will be pro-Obama.</p>
<p>The wage earners have been undecided in their opinions of Obama, because their general opinion with the legislative branches, Congress goes on vacation for a month while unemployment goes unchecked, and that feeling of discontent bleeds over to the administrative offices of our government.</p>
<p>2012 needs a challenging public promotion to vote. We cannot afford to sit in our homes and watch the elections from the comfort of our TV chairs. </p>
<p>We need a massive promotion for people who never vote, the get to the polls and do so. America is a miserable example of lazy citizens with only 54% turning out to vote for the presidential election and only 37% for mid-terms. </p>
<p>Other countries put us to shame and we need to remember just 5 years ago when the Iraqi populace dared to go out under fear of death to cast their vote for the first time in 30 years, as our troops served and died for them to have that &#8220;freedom&#8221;.</p>
<p>We cannot be classed as a fatten calf when it comes to voting. Far too many claim voting makes no difference anyways, when they forget that the power of the vote is what gave Americans their rights and freedoms, and changed the way those rights were exemplified in the 50&#8242;s and 60&#8242;s because people DID vote.</p>
<p>Those reasons alone should drive us to the polls.</p>
<p>Then decide just who you wish to vote for. </p>
<p>Come 2012 though, one of the biggest problems will be with choice.</p>
<p>Just who do the Republicans think they will place on the chopping block for a candidate, Bachmman or Palin? I would not be surprised to see them try to put a woman in for the presidency, just to gain the female vote, but?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuddyPC</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2011/08/05/can-obamas-2012-hopes-survive-9-unemployment/comment-page-1/#comment-12987</link>
		<dc:creator>BuddyPC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 19:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=11913#comment-12987</guid>
		<description>Rich Vail, you don&#039;t have to hope. The Welfare State HAS failed.
The problem is its advocates understanding that, and getting up and holding their ends.
The funny thing is, it didn&#039;t have to be this way. 
They could never content themselves with the 20-30% they siphoned off society and leaving us alone to keep and grow the remainder as we please, instead resenting what they others have rather than do what&#039;s needed themselves to attain more of what they want compared to their neighbors. They had to have more, now they (will) have less, if not nothing.
It either ends not well, sooner, or ugly, later. That it does is inevitable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich Vail, you don&#8217;t have to hope. The Welfare State HAS failed.<br />
The problem is its advocates understanding that, and getting up and holding their ends.<br />
The funny thing is, it didn&#8217;t have to be this way.<br />
They could never content themselves with the 20-30% they siphoned off society and leaving us alone to keep and grow the remainder as we please, instead resenting what they others have rather than do what&#8217;s needed themselves to attain more of what they want compared to their neighbors. They had to have more, now they (will) have less, if not nothing.<br />
It either ends not well, sooner, or ugly, later. That it does is inevitable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uncledirtnap</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2011/08/05/can-obamas-2012-hopes-survive-9-unemployment/comment-page-1/#comment-12984</link>
		<dc:creator>uncledirtnap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 19:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=11913#comment-12984</guid>
		<description>This is a much bigger H-bomb that anyone reading or writing knows.  Goldman Sachs and its forecasters have been in ObamaSoros&#039; hip pocket since day one - if they&#039;re projecting growth rates for public consumption this high the truth is they probably know they&#039;ll be much less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a much bigger H-bomb that anyone reading or writing knows.  Goldman Sachs and its forecasters have been in ObamaSoros&#8217; hip pocket since day one &#8211; if they&#8217;re projecting growth rates for public consumption this high the truth is they probably know they&#8217;ll be much less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fastred</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2011/08/05/can-obamas-2012-hopes-survive-9-unemployment/comment-page-1/#comment-12983</link>
		<dc:creator>fastred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 18:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=11913#comment-12983</guid>
		<description>Democrats controlled congress during Regan&#039;s deficits. The only way to get those tax changes was to load up on Democrat pork barrel spending.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democrats controlled congress during Regan&#8217;s deficits. The only way to get those tax changes was to load up on Democrat pork barrel spending.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elektrobahn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2011/08/05/can-obamas-2012-hopes-survive-9-unemployment/comment-page-1/#comment-12982</link>
		<dc:creator>Elektrobahn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 18:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=11913#comment-12982</guid>
		<description>I have faith that American voters will do the right thing in 2012 and toss this fraudster from Chicago into the dustbin of history. Then the true rebuilding and retooling of America&#039;s peerless economy can begin.

That said, I hope my faith isn&#039;t misplaced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have faith that American voters will do the right thing in 2012 and toss this fraudster from Chicago into the dustbin of history. Then the true rebuilding and retooling of America&#8217;s peerless economy can begin.</p>
<p>That said, I hope my faith isn&#8217;t misplaced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tgambogi</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2011/08/05/can-obamas-2012-hopes-survive-9-unemployment/comment-page-1/#comment-12979</link>
		<dc:creator>tgambogi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 18:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=11913#comment-12979</guid>
		<description>Obama&#039;s strategy won&#039;t change. He&#039;ll double down on Alynsky&#039;s Rules for Radicals deflect the economic issues and focus on what community organizers do best pit one group against the other. We&#039;ll hear claims of racism like never before and more citizens as well as non-citizens along with the deceased will be bused to the voting booths patrolled by  all kinds of Black Panthers.
It will be ugly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama&#8217;s strategy won&#8217;t change. He&#8217;ll double down on Alynsky&#8217;s Rules for Radicals deflect the economic issues and focus on what community organizers do best pit one group against the other. We&#8217;ll hear claims of racism like never before and more citizens as well as non-citizens along with the deceased will be bused to the voting booths patrolled by  all kinds of Black Panthers.<br />
It will be ugly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlanVanneman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2011/08/05/can-obamas-2012-hopes-survive-9-unemployment/comment-page-1/#comment-12978</link>
		<dc:creator>AlanVanneman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 18:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/?p=11913#comment-12978</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t you mean Reagan&#039;s deficit-spending driven recovery? And what about his 1983 tax INCREASES? Just curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t you mean Reagan&#8217;s deficit-spending driven recovery? And what about his 1983 tax INCREASES? Just curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
