Shocker – Davosians vote against more regulation
Duncan Niederauer, chief exec of NYSE Euronext, told a panel here at Davos that rather than inventing a whole host of new regulations, we’d be better off focusing on existing means of bringing order to markets, specifically taking a page from the exchanges books by having central clearing and more price transparancy for derivatives and off-exchange structured products. I think he’s actually got a great point about clearing and better price information, but I can’t see this as being anywhere near bringing regulation up to scratch.
The response from others on the panel was similar.
Nourial Roubini of NYU – “The ideology of the last decade was self-regulation which means no regulation. Reliance on ratings agencies with massive conflicts of interest.
“If we don’t want a backlash against trade we have to have prudential regulation of the financial system.”
Obama economic advisor Laura Tyson –
“We need regulation, we’ve tried self regulation and it doesn’t work. Psychology tells us that in a highly competitive game the insensitivity to risk grows. It’s like a drug addiction problem. They got so much pleasure that they simply stopped paying attention to the risk.”
At the end of the panel they held a vote on Niederauer’s idea and it won 71 percent to 29. Whether that was a vote for the sensible parts of his idea or for making that the whole of the regulatory effort I leave you to decide.
James Saft is a Reuters columnist. The ideas expressed are his own.