Europe ignores credit dynamics

December 13, 2011

James Saft is a Reuters columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.

Europe‘s rule-based approach to fiscal reform will fall short because it effectively ignores the dynamics of credit markets, which laid the tracks along which this train wreck traveled.

Europe moved last week to impose some discipline on its member states’ fiscal houses, choosing a rule-based fudge rather than the fiscal union that a common currency probably ultimately needs. It will thus take discretion away from member states, pre-committing them to austerity measures during tough times, while doing very little to address the malfunctions in the banking system which create destructive credit bubbles in the first place.

Reforming Europe‘s fiscal framework without addressing the financial system which created all of the credit is like having alcoholics take ever more severe pledges of sobriety and penalties but still allowing them to own cocktail lounges.

To be sure, some sort of reform is welcome. The past decade has provided ample evidence that the previous framework was easy to game for states without sufficient discipline.

That said, while the shambolic arrangements of the euro zone have hamstrung attempts to react to the crisis, the means by which euro zone states got themselves into trouble are varied.

There is, however, one common denominator – a credit bubble was a necessary precondition to the borrowing which now leaves various European sovereign borrowers suspect.

This is as true of Ireland as it is of Greece. It is also true of France and may someday be true of Germany, if the current stream of policy thought is brought to its logical conclusion.

Ireland suffered a collapse in sovereign credit-worthiness because its banks engaged in a Ponzi-fest of lending, both to their domestic clients and to borrowers abroad. Ireland was brought low by assuming, effectively, the credit risk for Irish banks, while a policy of austerity has combined with the natural fallout of a credit bust to crater tax receipts, further undermining the state’s ability to service its debts.

Something not too dissimilar happened in Spain with housing-related credit but not on the same scale and, so far, without an outright banking crisis. There too a credit bubble floated the economy, flattered tax receipts and put off the reckoning Spain is now undergoing.

Greece too fattened at the trough of the credit bubble, using easy global credit to allow it to finance profligate government spending, despite endemic tax fraud and corruption. You have to note here too that if a state fabricates its economic statistics no number of new rules or treaty revisions will work. Greece‘s problem wasn’t simply that it could borrow at German-like rates while being an old-fashioned emerging market, it was that it was doing so in the midst of probably the biggest global credit bubble ever.


And then we come to France, and its banks. Investors are now demanding more than a percent extra in interest to hold French bonds compared to German ones, in large part because France is the obvious bag-holder should its horrifically over-leveraged banks come undone. And yes, those banks have created credit and bestowed some of it on France itself, and much of it on doubtful borrowers further south, thus piling leverage upon leverage.

This seems to be a real blind spot in European – really in global – policy making. It is instructive to note that the European Central Bank has focused most of its ire on sovereign borrowers, which it refuses to coddle with direct purchases of government debt, while at the same time taking ever more extreme steps to keep banks alive with generous financing.

Last week the ECB came out with a host of liquidity provisions aimed at banks, including new long-term funding options, a relaxing of collateral rules and allowing national central banks to finance certain bank loans. Of course some of this liquidity will simply find its way back into sovereign debt, or at least many European states must hope so.

As far as Europe‘s reform of its banks goes, most of the effort is expended on making banks solvent, without effective measures to short-circuit the next credit bubble. That bubble will only happen after an almighty credit bust, which is now on its way as banks pull back from lending and seek to dispose of assets.

Looking through the coming recession and credit crunch, the excessive co-dependence of states and their banking systems looks likely to continue. There are no convincing measures under discussion in either Europe or the U.S. to break the too-big-to-fail guarantees, and so long as financial institutions are run for private profit while benefiting from a public guarantee the risk is the formation of another credit bubble.

Maybe next time it won’t be excessive government borrowing. It doesn’t need to be. The financial system will create the money, and governments will foot the bill for the instability that ultimately follows.

States must break the state/bank co-dependency or ultimately the banks will, perhaps literally, break the states.

(At the time of publication James Saft did not own any direct investments in securities mentioned in this article. He may be an owner indirectly as an investor in a fund.)


We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see

Thanks James, food for thought

Posted by scythe | Report as abusive

One thing that is becoming very dull is generalist reporters suddenly becoming experts on economics. So there is moral hazard in tbtf is there? Wow – and you are paid to come to that conclusion?

Posted by DMW1111 | Report as abusive

Political union of the EU means World War III. Also the end of liberty and freedom in Europe. All to make our current, undesirable, unsustainable financial structures last another year.

It is the banks that must go. They have proven themselves unreliable to everyone other than their top managers, who loot the banks that loot the treasuries that loot the pockets of the common man. Bankers — the end is near!

Political changes to make life easier for financial institutions are beyond stupid. Those institutions are not only not helpful to their hosts, they are damaging parasites. Financial malaria. Incurable.

Posted by txgadfly | Report as abusive

Is it “malfunctions in the banking system” that has caused the problem?

The supply of available money for lending seems to have become distorted by a practice of government lending to other governments, or government banks or beneficiaries lending to government. Both practices create a distorted demand for goods and a distorted pattern of savings. Distortion then amplifies distortion.

Distortions have come to the point where governments and their enclosed banks no longer trust other creditor governments and included banks. Socialist governments consider banks as extensions of their domain so it becomes a problem when one government considers a second government as being “bad credit”. This seems to be where we are today.

Posted by ThinkEcon | Report as abusive

Of course another way that the banks are breaking our society is by sucking the majority of our brightest graduates out of manufacturing industry and productive research with the lure of vast riches without having to do anything that actually creates wealth.

Posted by ActionDan | Report as abusive