Emerging markets pray for Wall Street tumble: James Saft

January 28, 2014

By James Saft

(Reuters) – What struggling emerging markets need right about now is a big sell-off – in the U.S.

Without a substantial downdraft on Wall Street, the Federal Reserve is highly likely to carry on trimming the amount of bonds it buys every month, continuing at its meeting ending on Wednesday by taking it down another $10 billion to $65 billion.

That tapering will accentuate pressure on emerging markets, which have suffered substantial losses on currencies and securities with investors increasingly less interested in discriminating between the weak and the more stable.

Weakness in emerging markets, and mixed U.S. economic data, have driven U.S. stocks down a somewhat paltry 4 percent or so from recent highs. While that leaves Wall Street lower than it was when the Fed commenced its quantitative easing rollback in December, there is little reason to believe it will prompt the U.S. central bank to stage an abrupt about-face, especially at Ben Bernanke’s farewell rate-setting meeting.

While that would immediately ease funding and market conditions for emerging markets, it would cost the Fed much in credibility, especially after it twice surprised investors in September and December about the timing of the taper.

Tapering is bad for emerging markets assets in exactly the opposite way the expansion of quantitative easing was good for them: it tightens the global supply of money seeking a better return, and sharpens investors’ focus on creditworthiness. That makes it harder for countries like South Africa, Turkey and India to attract the money they need.

All that leaves for emerging markets is the wan hope that the Fed will acknowledge, somehow, that tough times for emerging markets figure into their thinking.

“The Fed has stressed its view that what is good for the U.S. is good for the world, but that convinces no one abroad and few domestically, so the only issue is whether the Fed can find wording that simultaneously expresses serious concerns on spillover risk and remains non-committal,” Steven Englander, a foreign exchange strategist at Citigroup in New York, wrote in a note to clients.

“Irrespective of the wording, if investors walk away thinking there is only rhetoric and little possibility of a Fed reaction, asset markets will sell off.”


The Fed does have a track record on this in one respect -tough trading in emerging markets over the summer partly drove a Wall Street fall that directly led to the September surprise in which tapering was delayed. Bond yields were actually rising over the summer, however, while in recent days they’ve been falling.

Though much has been made in recent years about the positive developments within emerging markets, a buildup of foreign currency reserves as a buffer and the development of new sources of funding, this emerging market sell-off is playing out pretty much like they used to in the old days. First the weakest wobble, but shortly the entire asset class is under pressure.

“Right now we are in full-blown financial contagion mode, and that means correlations have rushed towards the dreaded 100 percent,” Benoit Anne, emerging market strategist at Societe Generale in London, wrote in a note to clients.

“There is no point spending too much time trying to pick and choose when faced with a severe market crisis like the one we are witnessing in front of our screens. Right now, sell everything.”

That probably holds a lesson for investors in developed markets. The provision of massive amounts of liquidity by global central banks, especially the Federal Reserve, was done precisely to make investors become less discriminating about risks. That allowed emerging markets, particularly the weakest, enough time, or rope if you prefer, to restructure and reform. Some did, notably, but many did not.

What happens in emerging markets is probably small enough not to drive global growth, but it is very likely similar to what will happen in developed markets as the Fed continues to remove stimulus.

There is plenty of evidence of excess in developed country credit markets and, as the taper continues, those companies and sectors, like housing, will come under stress. The key here is to watch U.S. interest rates. When they rise, all manner of companies and investments, from highly leveraged borrowers to single-family rental homes, will look less sustainable.

We saw a bit of that selloff over the summer in the U.S., and that is probably what caused the Fed to pause. If a risky asset selloff, a sizable one, starts in the U.S. in coming months, it too, like emerging markets today, will prompt an indiscriminate tumble.

That could cause the Fed to pause or reverse the taper, but not in time to be much help to emerging markets.

(At the time of publication James Saft did not own any direct investments in securities mentioned in this article. He may be an owner indirectly as an investor in a fund. You can email him at jamessaft@jamessaft.com and find more columns at blogs.reuters.com/james-saft)

(Editing by James Dalgleish)

No comments so far

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/