Joan's Feed
Oct 31, 2013

Housing case before U.S. justices close to settlement: lawyer

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – A case before the Supreme Court that could limit housing discrimination claims is close to a settlement, potentially removing an opportunity for the justices to rule on the matter.

Carter Phillips, a Washington lawyer for Mount Holly, New Jersey, one of the parties in the case watched by the insurance and banking community, said on Thursday that an agreement appeared close but was not confirmed. Both sides have been working for months on a settlement.

Oct 16, 2013

In U.S. top court race case, John Roberts is chief phrasemaker

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – As U.S. chief justice, John Roberts has sought to rein in laws he insists have gone too far on race. At the Supreme Court on Tuesday, he matched rhetoric to action with a pithiness that underscores his opposition to racial preferences.

The court heard a challenge to a Michigan ban on race-based “preferential treatment” in education admissions – a ban that Roberts appeared to support in his questioning of lawyers who argued the case.

Oct 14, 2013

U.S. justices to hear race case; one side has two voices

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday will delve into a decades-old debate over university admissions policies that favor racial minorities, hearing a Michigan case that picks up where the justices left off last session in a dispute from the University of Texas.

Unlike the Texas case that tested a specific affirmative action practice, this new dilemma revolves around a broad state constitutional amendment.

Oct 14, 2013

Analysis – U.S. justices to hear race case; one side has two voices

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday will delve into a decades-old debate over university admissions policies that favour racial minorities, hearing a Michigan case that picks up where the justices left off last session in a dispute from the University of Texas.

Unlike the Texas case that tested a specific affirmative action practice, this new dilemma revolves around a broad state constitutional amendment.

Oct 9, 2013

Analysis – Kagan, now in a robe, argues again for campaign finance limits

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The last time the U.S. Supreme Court heard a major campaign finance dispute, then-Solicitor General Elena Kagan stood at the lectern making the government’s case to the justices. On Tuesday she was on the bench, nearly as forceful, her sharp questions setting the tone for a defence of limits on political contributions and drawing caustic retorts from opposing justices.

Kagan, who argued the groundbreaking Citizens United case in September 2009 and then joined the nine-member court in August 2010, departed from her usual practice of waiting to jump into the give-and-take. Within the first five minutes of the hour-long session she began firing off worst-case scenarios at lawyers representing the latest challengers to federal campaign finance law.

Oct 9, 2013

Kagan, now in a robe, argues again for campaign finance limits

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The last time the U.S. Supreme Court heard a major campaign finance dispute, then-Solicitor General Elena Kagan stood at the lectern making the government’s case to the justices. On Tuesday she was on the bench, nearly as forceful, her sharp questions setting the tone for a defense of limits on political contributions and drawing caustic retorts from opposing justices.

Kagan, who argued the groundbreaking Citizens United case in September 2009 and then joined the nine-member court in August 2010, departed from her usual practice of waiting to jump into the give-and-take. Within the first five minutes of the hour-long session she began firing off worst-case scenarios at lawyers representing the latest challengers to federal campaign finance law.

Jul 4, 2013

Exclusive: Supreme Court’s Ginsburg vows to resist pressure to retire

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – At age 80, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, leader of the Supreme Court’s liberal wing, says she is in excellent health, even lifting weights despite having cracked a pair of ribs again, and plans to stay several more years on the bench.

In a Reuters interview late on Tuesday, she vowed to resist any pressure to retire that might come from liberals who want to ensure that Democratic President Barack Obama can pick her successor before the November 2016 presidential election.

Jun 27, 2013

Analysis – U.S. top court in no rush to grant national gay-marriage right

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – When the U.S. Supreme Court declined on Wednesday to rule on whether gay men and lesbians have a fundamental right to marry, it delivered an implicit message to those seeking such a right: Don’t hurry back.

All nine of the justices, with their votes and rhetoric in a pair of cases, signalled they either would never be willing, or are not ready yet, to cut off the unfolding state-by-state legislative debate on gay marriage. The five-justice alliance that came together in one case to extend federal benefits to same-sex couples splintered in the other case to avoid facing a larger test on the constitutional right.

Jun 27, 2013

Analysis: Supreme Court in no rush to grant national gay-marriage right

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – When the U.S. Supreme Court declined on Wednesday to rule on whether gay men and lesbians have a fundamental right to marry, it delivered an implicit message to those seeking such a right: Don’t hurry back.

All nine of the justices, with their votes and rhetoric in a pair of cases, signaled they either would never be willing, or are not ready yet, to cut off the unfolding state-by-state legislative debate on gay marriage. The five-justice alliance that came together in one case to extend federal benefits to same-sex couples splintered in the other case to avoid facing a larger test on the constitutional right.

Jun 27, 2013

U.S. top court in no rush to grant national gay-marriage right

WASHINGTON, June 26 (Reuters) – When the U.S. Supreme Court
declined on Wednesday to rule on whether gay men and lesbians
have a fundamental right to marry, it delivered an implicit
message to those seeking such a right: Don’t hurry back.

All nine of the justices, with their votes and rhetoric in a
pair of cases, signaled they either would never be willing, or
are not ready yet, to cut off the unfolding state-by-state
legislative debate on gay marriage. The five-justice alliance
that came together in one case to extend federal benefits to
same-sex couples splintered in the other case to avoid facing a
larger test on the constitutional right.