Yes, thank you, we’re more courteous than ever
â€śRudeness is just as bad as racismâ€ť: thus David Cameron, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, when he was leader of the opposition in April 2007. It was a remark he should know better to make now: not because it is politically incorrect (usually a bad reason for doing, or not doing, anything) but because itâ€™s crass.
Rudeness is being uncivil. Racism can be murderous.
But there is some excuse for the future Prime Ministerâ€™s confusion. The two are linked: the common denominator is respect. Racism is a radical lack of respect for an ethnicity which you have convinced yourself, or brought up, to despise. Rudeness is a milder lack of respect for others you meet in your journey through the day â€“ or through life. Further link: one of the reasons why thereâ€™s less rudeness is that, in the past couple of decades, casual racism has largely disappeared from public discourse in most advanced societies — though some of that is because it has gone underground.
Less rudeness? Who says less? Donâ€™t we all know that whatâ€™s the matter with kids today â€“ and quite often, with their parents â€“ is that they have no manners?
It doesnâ€™t seem that clear cut. In the UK, where unmannerly behavior â€“ the blast of stereos, the jostling of the elderly on public transport, the drunkenness and worse of young women in city centers on a Friday night â€“ is a daily moan, a new report says itâ€™s improving. It seems as counter intuitive as that other recent claim, by Steven Pinker of Harvard (in the 700-page The Better Angels of our Nature) that violence within and between societies has been falling for more than two millennia â€“ and that we live in unprecedentedly peaceful times. Can we be living in unprecedentedly nice times?
Charm Offensive, from the Young Foundation earlier this month, argued something just as absurd to those who read only the headlines: yes, we are. Thatâ€™s for a variety of reasons: one of these is that many people no longer express racism, and may no longer feel it: as one East End stallholder told the Young Foundationâ€™s researchers â€“ â€śwe have to be polite because weâ€™re so differentâ€ť. This is an ideal: others less civilized than the stallholder see difference as an excuse to be rude. But itâ€™s encouraging.
Courtesy â€“ the root of the word tells you much â€“ developed in Europe, in India, in China and elsewhere in part as a way of regulating relationships between often jealous and high-tempered courtiers, and to show respect for the â€śweaker sexâ€ť â€“ women. From these courts developed rituals of manners, elaborate and seriously observed, which paid homage to position, femininity and rank: the masses were, in the main, left out of these ceremonies.
Much of our present definition of civilized behavior lies in the spread of manners over the last two centuries â€“ as the masses received full citizenship and ordinary people saw themselves as equal to those to whom they had once deferred. Mannerly behavior ceased to be an aristocratic preserve â€“ even as itÂ borrowed substantially from aristocratic tradition. So even if we hate to acknowledge it, the upper classes taught us manners – even if they behaved vilely to many of our forebears.
The decline of racism has been one gain for civility: the fuller equality of women is a more ambiguous revolution. Until our own times, men defined much of their own civility by being gallant: now, its display can offend as much as delight.
My Italian wife, who teaches in a university near Milan, wanted to discuss a professional issue with a male colleague, and emailed to ask for a meeting. The colleague, an older man, emailed back to say that â€śladies like to be invited out: let us have lunchâ€ť: a response which drew indignant snorts, and a sharp reply that a coffee was fine, grazie. Though this may have been merely a creaking attempt at gallantry spiced with a little Latin machismo, it struck her as condescending, even arrogant, a bid to put her in her subordinate place. For the post-feminist generation, equality is to be assumed: when it isnâ€™t, itâ€™s a cause for anger, or irritation at least. Male-female civility can be a minefield for men who don’t think who meet women who don’t cut them some slack.
Social change doesnâ€™t sum up the pitfalls: the even more rapid development of communications technology demands new efforts to be careful of others. When he was 16, George Washington copied a manuscript called â€śRules of Civilityâ€ť, attributed to a Jesuit priest writing at the end of the 17th century. More than half of the 110 rules â€“ Jesuits are exhaustive â€“ were about things not to do: number 18 advised you to â€śread no letters, books or papers in company, but when there is a necessity for the doing of it you must ask leave.â€ť
Robert Desman, a Professor of Management at Kennesaw State University in Georgia – in a speech in Stockholm earlier this year â€“ translated that to our times as â€śdo not read or send text messages 1) when involved in a conversation, 2) in class, 3) during meetings, or 4) while driving.â€ť The sheer fascination of hand-held computers which can give you friendship, organization, entertainment and enlightenment demands new rules of civility: and so far, these are slow in coming (whatever the Young Foundation says).
P M Forni, another professor, who created the Civility Initiative at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore â€“ a city where, as we learn from The Wire, the commodity can be in short supply â€“ says that civility is â€śa code of decency to be applied in everyday lifeâ€¦fundamental to the making of a good, successful and serene life.â€ť This is something like the core of it. It isnâ€™t just being polite and itâ€™s not just tolerating others. Itâ€™s not etiquette, which is small-scale ceremony, nor civic behavior, which are large-scale actions to underpin democratic and open societies.
Itâ€™s small acts of daily civility. Itâ€™s a hand to the elderly, a smile to the neighbors in the street, a chat with the check-out guy, a lowering of the voice when on the cellphone, a curbing of the irritation when cut up on the motorway, a thought that a mess left in a hotel room will add to the burden of an underpaid woman, or that a rant to a call center will be the straw that breaks a harassed operator down into tears.
Itâ€™s a reading of the contemporary scene and a hundred decisions a day to at least make its annoyances no worse â€“ or better, make its opportunities richer, warmer.
Does this sound corny? Let’s hope so. In the matter of manners, that would be a compliment.
PHOTO: A sculpture of an angel with a broken wing is seen on the wall of music and spiritual room of the Detention Unit of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) in Hague, in this September 20, 2011 photo. REUTERS/Damir Sagolj