Ukraine’s future lies with the West, but there is much suffering ahead

September 19, 2014

RTR46XIG.jpg

Ukraine did something very Ukrainian this week. It sued for peace with Russia, apparently confirming a centuries-old subordination to Big Brother to the east. Yulia Tymoshenko, the former prime minister jailed by the deposed President Victor Yanukovich and now leader of the political party Batkivshchyna, called the laws implementing peace by granting autonomy to parts of eastern Ukraine “humiliating and betraying.”

At the same time, Ukraine did something very un-Ukrainian. It moved westward, toward the European Union, when it ratified an association-cum-trade agreement with the EU, thus taking a decisive first move away from Big Brother to the east. “Tell me,” proclaimed President Petro Poroshenko to the 355 members of the Ukrainian Parliament before they unanimously endorsed the pact, “who will now dare to shut Ukraine’s doors to Europe? Who will be against our future membership of the EU, towards which today we are taking our first but very decisive step?” Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk, who does not like to be upstaged by his president, said, “We are fixing a 350-year-old mistake: Ukraine is Europe!”

The president of the European Parliament, the German Social Democrat Martin Schulz, said the Ukrainian vote was a “historic moment” that met the “dreams of the people who fought for democracy” in Ukraine. A few days later, Porshenko flew to the United States to address the Congress: he said his soldiers were “fighting a war for the free world” against Russian aggression – and asked for advanced weaponry (which he’s unlikely to get).

Historic moments have been in vogue in Ukraine this year, and most of them have been quite nasty: Russia’s annexation of Crimea; the shooting down of a Malaysian airliner, probably by pro-Russian separatists using Russian-supplied rockets, and the mid-level civil war between Ukrainian forces and the Russian-backed separatists in eastern Ukraine. The EU/Ukraine association agreement is a much nicer historic moment, but the moment could turn nasty if the Russia bear sees in it a new provocation.

Spending much of the past weekend in Kiev listening to top Ukrainian politicians and distinguished foreigners talk about the crisis, I became convinced of one big thing. Russian President Vladimir Putin has “lost” the country that he and many other Russians have long regarded sentimentally as a cross between a little brother and a buffer (“Ukraine” means a border) against the West. As retired General Wesley Clark, a former NATO commander, put it, telling people they better be your friend or else there’s trouble is no longer a winning strategy.

It will be a while before Russian leaders, or most Russians, get around to seeing that in losing Ukraine, Russia could gain a friendly opening to the EU. In the meantime, the viability of both the truce and the trade agreement is uncertain.

A number of Ukrainian politicians besides Tymoshenko will use their opposition to the pact in their campaigns for parliament. Elections are due in February.

Though the Russians acquiesced to the deal, they demanded and won a delay in its implementation, now set for the end of 2015. Until then, Ukraine will continue to levy high tariffs on EU imports to protect its own and Russia’s economy and industries. “[The delay] takes away from the pressure to make the necessary reforms,” said Erik Berglof, chief economist at the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, though he added that Ukraine had to avoid having high tariffs slapped on its exports to Russia, as Moscow had threatened.

Much can happen in the next 16 months, and Russia may change its mind. According to Jose Manuel Barroso, the retiring president of the European Commission, Russian officials had appeared indifferent to Ukraine signing the same pact two years ago. James Sherr, a Ukraine expert at the Chatham House think tank, said the current crisis is so volatile and unpredictable that “it would be fanciful to have confidence that the (trade pact) will come into force at any time.”

The truce calls for an end to hostilities, the granting of temporary autonomy to the Donetsk-Luhansk region, an exchange of prisoners, the evacuation of the separatists from their combat positions and amnesty for the rebels. But at least one rebel commander has said that he and his supporters have no interest in remaining within Ukraine on any terms.

At the conference in Ukraine, a yearly exercise funded by Victor Pinchuk, one of Ukraine’s oligarchs, the top Ukrainian leaders and officials were militantly anti-Russian. Yatsenyuk said that Putin’s aim was to “take the entire Ukraine.” He called on NATO to admit his country. General Ihor Smeshko, former head of the state’s security services, conceded that Putin’s troops could, as the Russian president had boasted, get to Kiev in a few days – “but could they get out again?”

It was left to the veteran German politician and former Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer to articulate the meaning of the crisis: “The West, Europe, has to understand. This is a threat, not just to Ukraine, but also to Europe. A period of peace is over.” And though Fischer is right to say that Europe is threatened by Russia’s revived ambitions, and can no longer assert it is a continent at peace, it’s Ukraine that is bracing for further suffering.

 

PHOTO: A woman walks past a burnt-out train at a railway station in the town of Ilovaysk, eastern Ukraine, September 19, 2014. REUTERS/Marko Djurica

5 comments

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

Poroshenko’s statement in his parliament “Tell me now who will shut the doors of Ukraine for EU?” shows he is expecting too much from EU/US and counter productive to provoke Putin.Ukraine now is the boiling pot for ever.It seems he is not the man of peace and does not care for the killing of more people.Still he seems ignorant of the interrelations of countries of the changing world order.He sticks to pages of history or his personal ego as president.

Posted by gentalman | Report as abusive

…..rather he should have kept mum to let people to interpret the agreement with their perspective.Agreement itself is self explaining.

Posted by gentalman | Report as abusive

‘Centuries-old subordination’ is not really accurate. Kiev was an established cultural, administrative, commercial, military and university city around 1000 AD whilst Moscow and St. Petersburg were still swampland. Ukrainians have always advocated peace over warfare, culture over barbarism, education over ignorance and religious tolerance. Indeed these qualities of morality were provided to its many neighbours over time; Poland, Lithuania, Hungary,the Tartars, the Ottoman Empire and oh yes, to that tribe to the east. They all in turn advocated belligerence. The Ukrainian people were steadfast and resolute, defending their traditional lands with calvary and diplomacy,always united. In point of fact, Ukrainian cossacks and castles defended their lands and by default Europe from the Mongolian Invasions, preserving Europe from carnage and plunder. Stalin murdered 10 million defenseless Ukrainians in 1932-1933 Holodomor, a travesty which ought to be recognized in current media. Donbas has always been Ukraine; unless you acknowledge genocide as a reasonable method of expropriation. The land mass of Ukraine is 603,628 sq kms, the largest country in Europe; this manifest physical existence is testament to the virtues of Ukrainian civilization. Morality is the key and has nothing to do with ‘subordination’.

Posted by trypillian | Report as abusive

We should pause to consider why, when Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer says “The West, Europe, has to understand. This is a threat, not just to Ukraine, but also to Europe. A period of peace is over.” – did the EU twin up with the US to guarantee that European peace and trade with Russia would be dangerously compromised? Only “two very thick short planks” could have ignored the WW3 risk by stamping so unceremoneously on Russia’s delicate toes. EU is hand in hand with Washington’s politics of the damned who don’t mind having us as a buffer when they start bombing.

Posted by baglanboy | Report as abusive

Putin unintentially has sped up the “Europeanization” of Ukraine by pushing its economy into depression and offing a threat to Ukraine’s very existance in the form of tanks and special ops invasion.

No amount of subsidized gas from Gasprom can make up for the theft of Crimea or the deaths of 3,000+ Ukrainians.

The anachronism that Ukraine’s economy is today can become the next Poland or Check Republic tomorrow. Let Putin keep his rusting Black Fleet in the stolen port – Ukraine sails for the future now, not the past.

Posted by DonD1977 | Report as abusive