Reuters Blogs

MacroScope

Shining a light on the dismal science

03:01 April 7th, 2009

Punctured Britain

Posted by: David Milliken
Tags: MacroScope, , , , , ,

If British chancellor Alistair Darling now occasionally tires of being reminded of his party’s erstwhile promise of  “no more boom and bust”, he won’t thank British accountancy firm Grant Thornton  for sending journalists a bike puncture repair kit.

Billed as “Darling’s economic repair kit — fixes deflation in all business cycles”, the marketing gimmick highlights the serious challenge facing Darling as he prepares to deliver his annual budget to parliament on April 22.

Researchers at the non-partisan Institute for Fiscal Studies  say Britain needs to find another 40 billion pounds in savings or higher taxes, equivalent to nearly 3 percent of GDP or £1,200 per family, if it is to balance its budget by the 2015/16 tax year, as Darling promised to do in his October pre-budget report.

IFS Deputy Director Carl Emmerson, who co-wrote the report, told Reuters MacroScope that Darling would have a tough time politically making convincing promises about future tax rises or cuts to government spending, especially as there’s a national election due within little over a year.

But doing so could make it easier for Britain to raise the necessary billions from international debt markets, after a scare last month when the Debt Management Office failed to sell all of a 2049 gilt to investors.

It would also allow more scope to announce a slightly bigger fiscal stimulus package at the budget, said Emmerson — who rejects the idea that the government should start reining back spending or raising taxes in the recession.

(Reuters photo: Pascal Rossignol)

Post Your Comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

House Rules:
  • We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information
  • We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous information.