MacroScope

The Fed’s befuddling transparency

January 23, 2012

The Fed is being more transparent. Any questions? Lots, apparently. Wall Street economists have published a flurry of research notes speculating about just how much new information the U.S. central bank will release along with its federal funds forecasts on Wednesday, and what form it will be presented in.

Even Vincent Reinhart, a former Fed economist now at Morgan Stanley, doesn’t know what to make of it:

Many market participants admit to being somewhat confused about the new disclosure policy. The exercise should be viewed as incremental in nature, limited by design flaws, and as likely to cloud as to clarify the public’s understanding of policy intent, at least at the outset. And the mission statement, if one appears, may amount to little more than a strong commitment to motherhood and apple pie among central bankers – i.e., the importance of price stability in the long run – but provide no practical guidance as to near-term policy choices.

Why does the Fed have such a hard time communicating its communications? It’s still not clear what exactly is being released, or when. Another example, from Mike Feroli, economist at JP Morgan and also a former Fed staffer:

As of now our understanding about the release of information is that at 12:30 we get the usual FOMC statement, then at 2:00 we’ll receive the economic forecasts, expanded now to include the above-mentioned forecast for the funds rate, followed immediately thereafter by the Chairman’s press conference. The narrative regarding the prospects for the balance sheet — which was mentioned as a communication enhancement in the last minutes — will apparently not be released until the next FOMC minutes, three weeks after the meeting.

Dana Saporta, a veteran Fed watcher at Credit Suisse, also has some unanswered questions:

It is unclear whether the “accompanying narrative” the Fed has advertised will be released on January 25, as well, or whether we need to wait for the full Summary of Economic Projections to be released along with the meeting minutes on February 15.

All clear?

 

 

Comments
2 comments so far | RSS Comments RSS

If the Fed is so transparent, why does it refuse to explain why it has been selling Treasuries on balance and shrinking the SOMA since December 21. The Fed is only transparent in promoting higher stock prices. It’s opaque on anything that does not.

Posted by LeeAdler | Report as abusive
 

We need a full audit of the fed, and full disclosure of the ownership and exactly how much money was given to other central banks, as well as how much money it makes overall. Google money as debt or moneychangers and learn about this organization and why Ron Paul wants to get us away from it’s caustic grip.

Posted by NowImPOd | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/