from Global Investing:
EM growth is passport out of West’s mess but has a price, says “Mr BRIC”
Anyone worried about Greece and the potential impact of the euro debt crisis on the world economy should have a chat with Jim O'Neill. O'Neill, the head of Goldman Sachs Asset Management ten years ago coined the BRIC acronym to describe the four biggest emerging economies and perhaps understandably, he is not too perturbed by the outcome of the Greek crisis. Speaking at a recent conference, the man who is often called Mr BRIC, pointed out that China's economy is growing by $1 trillion a year and that means it is adding the equivalent of a Greece every 4 months. And what if the market turns its guns on Italy, a far larger economy than Greece? Italy's economy was surpassed in size last year by Brazil, another of the BRICs, O'Neill counters, adding:
"How Italy plays out will be important but people should not exaggerate its global importance. In the next 12 months the four BRICs will create the equivalent of another Italy."
Emerging economies are cooling now after years of turbo-charged growth. But according to O'Neill, even then they are growing enough to allow the global economy to expand at 4-4.5 percent, a faster clip than much of the past 30 years. Trade data for last year will soon show that Germany for the first time exported more goods to the four BRICs than to neighbouring France, he said.
"Post-crisis, these countries will be our passport out of this mess."
But there has to be a payoff for this kind of increased financial clout, he warns. Developing countries are increasingly disgruntled about the the richer world's strangehold on global policies via the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank and most have responded coolly to the call for additional funds for the IMF which is fighting to stem the euro zone malaise. An attempt last year to install a representative of the developing world at the helm of the IMF for the first time ever fell apart, with Europe retaining the position. But emerging countries could make a bid for the World Bank chief's position this year, a position traditionally held by a U.S. citizen. O'Neill said the West had to bow to the new reality:
"You can't have it both ways...This game of 'You have the IMF and I have the World Bank' has to stop or these institutions are going to lose their relevance."
He is also dismissive of fears China is headed for a so-called hard landing, a sharp slowdown of growth, potentially leading to unemployment, a property crash and social unrest in the world's No. 2 economy. "A lot of people (in the West) want China to have a hard landing, " he said. "And that's because it isnt us."
from Global Investing:
Can Eastern Europe “sweat” it?
Interesting to see that Poland wants to squeeze out more income from its state-owned enterprise (SOE) sector in the face of slowing economic growth and financing pressures.
Warsaw wants to double next year's dividends from stakes in firms ranging from copper mines to utility providers to banks.
Fellow euro zone aspirant Lithuania has also embarked on reforms aimed at increasing dividends sixfold from what UBS has dubbed "the forgotten side of the government balance sheet". It wants to emulate countries such as Sweden and Singapore where such companies are managed at arm's length from the state and run along strict corporate standards to consistently grow profits.
The impetus isn't entirely ideological. Poland and Lithuania are desperately trying to balance their books and under European Commission rules, privatisation proceeds cannot be taken into account when calculating the budget deficit but SOE dividends can.
But "sweating" government assets to yield higher profits doesn't always come easy for central and eastern Europe. After all, this is a region where state ownership has been synonymous with inefficiency and stagnation.
Even so, the track record of emerging European governments on privatisation is mixed.
The haste at which state resources were sold off following the collapse of the Soviet Union had disastrous repercussions for economies such as Russia and Croatia. Recent efforts at state divestment from Poland to the Czech Republic to Romania have run aground on unrealistic price expectations, corruption or regulatory obstruction.
from Global Investing:
Moscow is not Cairo. Time to buy shares?
The speed of the backlash building against Russia's paramount leader Vladimir Putin following this week's parliamentary elections has taken investors by surprise and sent the country's shares and rouble down sharply lower.
Comparisons to the Arab Spring may be tempting, given that the demonstrations in Russia are also spearheaded by Internet-savvy youth organising via social networks.
But Russia's economic and demographic profiles suggest quite different outcomes from those in the Middle East and North Africa. The gathering unrest may, in fact, signal a reversal of fortunes for the stock market, down 18 percent this year, argue Renaissance Capital analysts Ivan Tchakarov, Mert Yildiz and Mert Yildiz.
First of all, Russia's youth unemployment rate is relatively low at 14 percent, compared to Syria's 18 and 30 percent in Tunisia.
Secondly, the percentage of young men as part of its rapidly ageing population is low -- those aged 15-29 account for 11 percent in 2009 versus a range of 13-17 percent in its fellow oil-exporting peers in the Middle East. This is particularly significant since the relationship between a country's political stability and its proportion of angry young men has been well elucidated.
And although Russia’s GDP per capita is generally higher than those in the Middle East, its income inequality is more pronounced. Energy exports per capita are also lower in Russia. All this suggests there is room for the Kremlin to ratchet up government spending to cool public anger if it wanted to.
"A strategy of moderately higher government spending on the eve of Russia’s March presidential elections may help assuage current pressures. Russia’s 2012 budget already assumes that spending grows at higher rates than inflation, but we believe additional fiscal disbursement may well occur," the Moscow-headquartered investment bank said.
from Global Investing:
Emerging consumers’ pain to spell gains for stocks in staples
Food and electricity bills are high. The cost of filling up at the petrol station isn't coming down much either. The U.S. economy is in trouble and suddenly the job isn't as secure as it seemed. Maybe that designer handbag and new car aren't such good ideas after all.
That's the kind of decision millions of middle class consumers in developing countries are facing these days. That's bad news for purveyors of everything from jeans to iphones who have enjoyed double-digit profits thanks to booming sales in emerging markets.
Brazil is the best example of how emerging market consumers are tightening their belts. Thanks to their spending splurge earlier this decade, Brazilian consumers on average see a quarter of their income disappear these days on debt repayments. People's credit card bills can carry interest rates of up to 45 percent. The central bank is so worried about the growth outlook it stunned markets with a cut in interest rates this week even though inflation is running well above target
All that bodes ill for shares in companies selling so-called consumer discretionaries in developing countries -- non-essential items such as autos and high-end cosmetics.
But someone's loss is someone's gain. Shares in companies selling consumer staples --food, beverages, prescription meds and tobacco -- are starting to pick up. In short, everything that outperforms during economic downturns. MSCI's index of emerging market staples is flat on the year, doing only slighly better than consumer discretionaries. But guess what? In August, when everything was selling off staples did ok. They fell 2.4 percent, much better than MSCI's discretionaries index which lost 8 percent.
Bank of America/Merrill Lynch's monthly survey shows fund managers went overweight consumer staples in August for the first time this year. Back in January when investors were optimistic about the U.S. economic outlook, almost 60 percent of fund managers were underweight staples. They still like discretionaries but cut that position pretty sharply last month.
What of Brazil? Carlos de Leon, a fund manager at RCM still sees opportunities there, especially as minimum wages will rise by an above-inflation 12 percent next year. But unsurprisingly, his picks are consumer staples and defensives including toll road operators, fuel distributors and utilities.
Emerging markets: Soft patch or recession?
Could the dreaded R word come back to haunt the developing world? A study by Goldman Sachs shows how differently financial markets and surveys are assessing the possibility of a recession in emerging markets. One part of the Goldman study comprising survey-based leading indicators saw the probability of recession as very low across central and eastern Europe, Middle East and Africa. These give a picture of where each economy currently stands in the cycle. This model found risks to be highest in Turkey and South Africa, with a 38-40 percent possibility of recession in these countries. On the other hand, financial markets, which have sold off sharply over the past month, signalled a more pessimistic outcome. Goldman says these indicators forecast a 67 percent probability of recession in the Czech Republic and 58 percent in Israel, followed by Poland and Turkey. Unlike the survey, financial data were more positive on South Africa than the others, seeing a relatively low 32 percent recession risk. Goldman analysts say the recession probabilities signalled by the survey-based indicator jell with its own forecasts of a soft patch followed by a broad sustained recovery for CEEMEA economies. “The slowdown signalled by the financial indicators appears to go beyond the ‘soft patch’ that we are currently forecasting,” Goldman says, adding: “The key question now is whether or not the market has gone too far in pricing in a more serious economic downturn.”
“R” word?? How about the “DEPRESSION” word?? Stupid Obama wants to jump start jobs, but unless you make EXPORTABLE products, the makework “jobs” created are just adding to the DEBT.
We borrow to pay for the huge imbalance of IMPORTS over EXPORTS, thanks to Rich Republican Banksters who have exported our good jobs and sent their illicit loot to offshore and hidden accounts.
They don’t care a fig for the USA, they laugh at the stupid crackers who vote for the RepubliCons.
Give me liberty and give me cash!
Come back Mr Fukuyama, all is forgiven.
In his 1992 book “The End of History and the Last Man”, American political scientist Francis Fukuyama famously argued that all states were moving inexorably towards liberal democracy. His thesis that democracy is the pinnacle of political evolution has since been challenged by the violent eruption of radical Islam as well as the economic success of authoritarian countries such as China and Russia.
Now a study by Russian investment bank Renaissance Capital into the link between economic wealth and democracy seems to back Fukuyama.
Looking at 150 countries and over 60 years of history, RenCap found that countries are likely to become more democratic as they enjoyed rising levels of income with democracy virtually ‘immortal’ in countries with a GDP per capita above $10,000.
” Only five democracies above the $6,000 income level have died. Even democracies above the $6,000 level have a 99 percent chance of sustaining their political system each year. The only exceptions were the military coups in Greece in 1967 ($9,800), Argentina in 1976 ($8,180) and Thailand in 2006 ($7,440), and the events in Venezuela in 2009 ($9,115), as well as Iran in 2004 ($8,475),” RenCap global chief economist Charles Robertson writes.
The $6,000 per capita GDP seems to be a crucial level, marking the point where a country is likely to shift to democracy. Tunisia, which early this year triggered the wave of uprisings against autocracy across the Arab world, recently crossed that threshold.
Conversely, democracy is most fragile at the lowest income levels and when incomes are shrinking. The world’s populous democracy, India, is a notable exception as its per capita income was under $800 from 1950-1967, and only exceeded $2,000 in 2003.
from Global Investing:
Russia’s babushka time-bomb
The babushka, that embodiment of Russian grandmotherly goodness that has spawned iconic dolls and inspired a Kate Bush song, poses one of the gravest threat to the Russian economy.
Moscow-based investment bank Renaissance Capital also expects this segment of the demography to spur politically risky pension reforms.
Russia's pension system is coming under increasing strain thanks to growing life expectancy -- particularly among women -- and a shrinking labour force due to the collapse in birth rates in the 1990s.
Since the introduction of the current system, the average life span of the Russian man has risen to 63.4 years, up from 58.7. Over the same period of time, the life expectancy for the country's women has risen to 75.4 years, up from 71.9.
Russian women are thus likely to claim a pension for 20 years after retirement at 55. Compare this to the three to four years that the average Russian man gets.
Little wonder that it's the babushka segment of the demographic that is giving Russian policymakers cause for pause.
"This is becoming expensive. Russia spends 6 percent of GDP on pensions compared to just 1 percent of GDP in Mexico." writes Renaissance Capital Chief Economist Charles Robertson in a note.
Brazil joins fellow-BRIC China in world’s Top 5
Distracted by the upheaval in the Middle East and $120 per barrel oil, few noted Brazil’s ascent last week to the ranks of the world’s top five economies. Strange given that the move comes just months after China displaced Japan as the second-biggest economy in the world.
Goldman Sachs Asset Management head Jim O’Neill points out that Brazil — part of the BRIC group of big emerging economies – grew 7.5 percent in 2010. By the end of last year the economy was valued around $2.2 trillion. That’s next only to the United States, China, Japan and Germany. And bigger than France and Britain.
O’Neill, who coined the BRICs concept in 2001, says the achievement has come earlier than he had expected. But then Goldman analysts had expected China to overtake Japan only in 2015.
Brazil is unlikely to continue growing at last year’s annual rate of 7.5 percent which was a 24-year high. O’Neill expects trend growth closer to the 5 percent level. But BRIC juggernaut looks unstoppable – Goldman’s latest forecast is for the BRICs’ combined economies to match the G7 rich states in the next decade and overtake the United States by 2018.
In current U.S. dollar terms, combined BRIC GDP at the end of 2010 was just over $11 trillion, more than double the nominal GDP assumed back in 2003,China’s economy is two times larger than it was in 2003 and Brazil’s is three times bigger than 2003 levels.
“Brazil is now the fifth-largest economy. Two down, two to go,” O Neill said, referring to India and Russia which are yet to join the top five.
from Global Investing:
Jean-Claude Trichet, EM c.bankers’ new friend
What a friend emerging central bankers have in Jean-Claude Trichet. Last month the ECB boss stopped euro bears in their tracks by unexpectedly signalling concern over inflation in the euro zone. Since then the euro has pushed steadily higher -- against the dollar of course, but also against emerging currencies. The bet now is that interest rates -- and the yield on euro investments -- will start rising some time this year, possibly as early as this summer.
That's provided some relief to central banks in the developing world who have struggled for months to stem the relentless rise in their currencies.
Being short euro versus emerging currencies was a popular investment theme at the start of 2011, partly because of EM strength but also because of the euro zone debt crisis. "What that also means is that people who were short euro against emerging currencies had to get out of those positions really fast," says Manik Narain, a strategist at investment bank UBS. Check out the Turkish lira -- that's fallen around 5 percent against the euro since Trichet's Jan 13 comments and is at the highest in over a year. South Africa's rand is down 6 percent too. Moves in other crosses have been less dramatic but the euro's star is definitely in the ascendant. The short EM trade versus the euro has more room to run, Narain reckons.
But emerging central bankers can take some of the credit for their currencies' recent weakness. Many have dragged their feet on tightening monetary policy -- Indonesia, Chile and Russia were among those that surprised markets last month by not raising interest rates; Turkey went a step further and cut rates. To some extent that has worked -- fears of an inflation spiral are pushing cash out of emerging stock and bond markets.
Expectations are Trichet will retain his hawkish tone at this Thursday's ECB meeting. Emerging central bankers will certainly be hoping that he does.
from Davos Notebook:
Will Goldman’s new BRICwork stand up?
Jim O'Neill, the Goldman Sachs economist who coined the term BRICs back in 2001, is adding four new countries to the elite club of emerging market economies. But does his new edifice have the same solid foundations?
In future, the BRIC economies of Brazil, Russia, China and India will be merged with those of Mexico, Indonesia, Turkey and South Korea under the banner “growth markets,” O'Neill told the Financial Times.
Hmmm. Doesn't quite grab you like BRICs, does it? The Guardian helpfully offers an amended branding banner of "Bric 'n Mitsk" (geddit?). But which ever way you cut it, it's hard to see a flood of investment conferences and funds floating off under the new moniker.
Ten years ago, Goldman had this field to itself. Now more and more acronyms are being bandied around by banks seeking to pique investors' appetite for higher returns.
Goldman has already launched the N-11, or Next Eleven countries, and other contenders include the VISTA economies (Vietnam, Indonesia, South Africa, Turkey and Argentina), the CIVETS (Colombia, Indonesia, Vietnam, Egypt, Turkey and South Africa) and the EAGLES (Emerging and Growth-Leading Economies).
So far, none of them have really caught on. One thing you can bank on: the term BRIC will still score highly in any tally of the millions of words that will issue forth from Davos next week.
