<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: XM/Sirius: FCC OK by Oct, analyst says</title>
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2007/09/12/xmsirius-fcc-ok-by-oct-analyst-says/</link>
	<description>Where media and technology meet</description>
	<pubDate>Mon,  8 Sep 2008 07:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Keep an eye on: Sirius/XM - Mediafile</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2007/09/12/xmsirius-fcc-ok-by-oct-analyst-says/#comment-332149</link>
		<dc:creator>Keep an eye on: Sirius/XM - Mediafile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 19:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2007/09/12/xmsirius-fcc-ok-by-oct-analyst-says/#comment-332149</guid>
		<description>[...] opinions have swayed back and forth  . And XM&#8217;s share chart over the past 6 months mimics a Sine Wave [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] opinions have swayed back and forth  . And XM&#8217;s share chart over the past 6 months mimics a Sine Wave [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nabisco</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2007/09/12/xmsirius-fcc-ok-by-oct-analyst-says/#comment-325192</link>
		<dc:creator>Nabisco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2007/09/12/xmsirius-fcc-ok-by-oct-analyst-says/#comment-325192</guid>
		<description>Are consumer options and diversity of programming the "double programming issues" that you advocate eliminating?  Because that's going to be the net result if the merger is approved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are consumer options and diversity of programming the &#8220;double programming issues&#8221; that you advocate eliminating?  Because that&#8217;s going to be the net result if the merger is approved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2007/09/12/xmsirius-fcc-ok-by-oct-analyst-says/#comment-314978</link>
		<dc:creator>Darin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 15:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2007/09/12/xmsirius-fcc-ok-by-oct-analyst-says/#comment-314978</guid>
		<description>One satellite company, radio or tv, who serve the public in a better capacity. It would eliminate all of the double programming issues. Pay a smaller amount for programming, reduce costs for the companies and consumer. If they raise prices being a monopoly, then we have other options and they will not be in business long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One satellite company, radio or tv, who serve the public in a better capacity. It would eliminate all of the double programming issues. Pay a smaller amount for programming, reduce costs for the companies and consumer. If they raise prices being a monopoly, then we have other options and they will not be in business long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nabisco</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2007/09/12/xmsirius-fcc-ok-by-oct-analyst-says/#comment-307362</link>
		<dc:creator>Nabisco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 04:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2007/09/12/xmsirius-fcc-ok-by-oct-analyst-says/#comment-307362</guid>
		<description>I do some consulting work with the NAB and fail to see how the Whole Foods/Wild Oats merger is more relevant than the DirectTV/Dish merger that was rejected by the FCC.  The bottom line here is that in any industry, a monopoly is never in the best interest of consumers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do some consulting work with the NAB and fail to see how the Whole Foods/Wild Oats merger is more relevant than the DirectTV/Dish merger that was rejected by the FCC.  The bottom line here is that in any industry, a monopoly is never in the best interest of consumers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
