Reuters Blogs

MediaFile

Where media and technology meet

09:30 November 13th, 2007

Keep an eye on: Murdoch’s WSJ.com

Posted by: Kenneth Li
Tags: Mediafile

murdochwsjpaper.jpgNot a week goes by before Rupert Murdoch rocks the media world again, this time in his company’s former hometown of Adelaide, Australia.

At a shareholders meeting on Tuesday, Murdoch confirmed what everyone suspected — WSJ.com is expected to go free. That decision means relinquishing in the near term a hard-won 1 million subscribers paying up to $99 a year to access the site.

Murdoch said he expected 10 million to 15 million readers “in every corner of the Earth” as a result. Lehman Brothers earlier estimated in August the site will need to boost pageviews by two to three times to recoup the estimated $65 million in lost subscription revenue or close to half of WSJ.com’s revenue in total. That’s a tall order, Lehman estimated.

Clearly, Murdoch is planning for the long term, where WSJ.com and its sister properties MarketWatch.com aims to put a serious dent not only in Financial Times and the New York Times, but also the big online finance portals Yahoo Finance and MSN Money.

(Reuters)

Keep an eye on:

  • Yahoo struck deals to offer mobile phone Web services with nine wireless carriers across Asia. (Reuters)
  • U.S. house price comparison Web site Zillow.com struck a deal with 11 publishers of 282 newspapers to carry their real estate ads. (Reuters)
  • Longer form online videos gains more viewers, according to a Move Networks study. (TechCrunch)
  • CBS News writers and editors to vote on authorizing a strike on Nov. 15. (AP via NYT)

(Photo: Reuters file)

Post Your Comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

House Rules:
  • We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information
  • We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous information.