Reuters Blogs

MediaFile

Where media and technology meet

18:59 January 11th, 2008

Gabelli on broadcasters, newspapers

Posted by: Robert MacMillan
Tags: Mediafile

GAMCO Chairman and Chief Investment Officer Mario Gabelli shared his thoughts about the media — particularly broadcasters and newspapers — with Reuters reporter Herb Lash on Friday. GAMCO has investments in several media companies, including Milwaukee Journal Sentinel publisher and broadcaster Journal Communications. It also owns shares in Richmond, Virginia-based Media General, which publishes the Richmond Times-Dispatch and the Tampa Tribune , and runs several TV stations in the southeastern United States.

Gabelli said the do-it-yourself content and low costs of YouTube are unnerving old-fashioned broadcasters:

Now the pamphleteers of this era are everyone. Everyone can log in, create their own blog, create their own news, get in the chat rooms.

He also said media companies with broadcast operations generate good cashflow and don’t need large capital expenditure outlays. But newspaper publishers, meanwhile, will have to merge to claw their way out of their death spiral:

Unfortunately, these stocks are going down and they will continue to go down.”

Automated algorithmic trading plays a role there:

They sell something short to buy something long. So what goes up they want, what goes down they continue to sell.

Earlier in the day, I published the results of conversations I had with some analysts and investors about the state of newspaper stocks in the coming year. You can read the story here. The short take is: If you’re willing to ride it out more than a year, and maybe even hang on for a couple years, steady cashflow and cheap share prices may reward you.

2 comments so far

i may sound bit odd - but i m firm believer of having state funded but run by independent forum media company (like bBC) i.e not a big fan of Rupert Murdoch gene …

- Posted by 360view

Hey 360,
Thanks for the comment. What do you think the chances are that the business could transform into something like this? We’d be talking about a hell of a tax increase, I’d think. This isn’t a skeptical question, but a truly inquisitive one. How would we get there from here?

- Posted by Robert MacMillan

Post Your Comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

House Rules:
  • We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information
  • We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous information.