Comments on: Thinking about EchoStarSiriusXMSatelliteRadio Inc. http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2009/02/05/thinking-about-echostarsiriusxmsatelliteradio-inc/ Where media and technology meet Fri, 24 May 2013 10:42:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: egiscodr http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2009/02/05/thinking-about-echostarsiriusxmsatelliteradio-inc/comment-page-1/#comment-355797 egiscodr Fri, 06 Feb 2009 05:29:03 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=14448#comment-355797 Maybe you idiots should get your facts straight before writing an article. The stock closed at .165. Not super, but not .14. If EchoStar was looking to force the issue, they would need to get in line behind many others before they would even have a chance to get their money. The FCC would in no way allow them to purchase the company. So where does that leave us? This could very easily be a partnership. Of course you idiots from the WSJ and Reuters don't bother doing your homeowkr or getting your facts straiht before spouting out more of your nonsense. Why don't you post a correction so you can bump your garbage back up to the top of the news queues so it looks like you are actually reporting something AGAIN. Maybe the WSJ and Reuters need to get back to actually reporting the news instead of always trying to create it. Maybe then someone will respect you as a news source. Maybe you idiots should get your facts straight before writing an article. The stock closed at .165. Not super, but not .14. If EchoStar was looking to force the issue, they would need to get in line behind many others before they would even have a chance to get their money. The FCC would in no way allow them to purchase the company. So where does that leave us? This could very easily be a partnership. Of course you idiots from the WSJ and Reuters don’t bother doing your homeowkr or getting your facts straiht before spouting out more of your nonsense.

Why don’t you post a correction so you can bump your garbage back up to the top of the news queues so it looks like you are actually reporting something AGAIN.

Maybe the WSJ and Reuters need to get back to actually reporting the news instead of always trying to create it. Maybe then someone will respect you as a news source.

]]>