<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter vs. Facebook &#8212; you make the call</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2009/05/27/twitter-vs-facebook-you-make-the-call/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2009/05/27/twitter-vs-facebook-you-make-the-call/</link>
	<description>Where media and technology meet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 09:39:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drewbie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2009/05/27/twitter-vs-facebook-you-make-the-call/comment-page-1/#comment-359160</link>
		<dc:creator>Drewbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=16983#comment-359160</guid>
		<description>Facebook&#039;s status update serves pretty much the same function as Twitter, but has lots of other service options as well.  Facebook is the stronger of the two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook&#8217;s status update serves pretty much the same function as Twitter, but has lots of other service options as well.  Facebook is the stronger of the two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Chapman - Virtual Outdoor Adventures</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2009/05/27/twitter-vs-facebook-you-make-the-call/comment-page-1/#comment-359159</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Chapman - Virtual Outdoor Adventures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=16983#comment-359159</guid>
		<description>Twitter has my vote. It is simpler and from a user interface perspective has much less clutter. Twitter is a far better social networking tool, as it allows its users to randomly find other users with specific interests - if someone twits about a subject they are obviously interested or involved with that subject matter. I&#039;m running a digital guidebook business for outdoor adventure locations, and have found Twitter to be a very useful tool to link with like minded individuals and companies. http://twitter.com/VirtualOutdoor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter has my vote. It is simpler and from a user interface perspective has much less clutter. Twitter is a far better social networking tool, as it allows its users to randomly find other users with specific interests &#8211; if someone twits about a subject they are obviously interested or involved with that subject matter. I&#8217;m running a digital guidebook business for outdoor adventure locations, and have found Twitter to be a very useful tool to link with like minded individuals and companies. <a href='http://twitter.com/VirtualOutdoor'>http://twitter.com/VirtualOutdoor</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook all the way!</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2009/05/27/twitter-vs-facebook-you-make-the-call/comment-page-1/#comment-359129</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook all the way!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 17:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=16983#comment-359129</guid>
		<description>Facebook is way beter. so many options, so many activities, fun with friends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook is way beter. so many options, so many activities, fun with friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otis Gospodnetic</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2009/05/27/twitter-vs-facebook-you-make-the-call/comment-page-1/#comment-359127</link>
		<dc:creator>Otis Gospodnetic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 16:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=16983#comment-359127</guid>
		<description>messenger:
Twitter has a 140 character limit and, as far as I know, doesn&#039;t moderate people&#039;s tweets.  But yes, they are also wildly different.  Twitter is just a subset of Facebook&#039;s functionality (and user base).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>messenger:<br />
Twitter has a 140 character limit and, as far as I know, doesn&#8217;t moderate people&#8217;s tweets.  But yes, they are also wildly different.  Twitter is just a subset of Facebook&#8217;s functionality (and user base).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: messenger</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2009/05/27/twitter-vs-facebook-you-make-the-call/comment-page-1/#comment-359124</link>
		<dc:creator>messenger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 15:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=16983#comment-359124</guid>
		<description>No comparison.  Facebook allows many things, Twitters only allows 45 characters or less. Twitters only allows what they want you to says and nothing more.  To much control on what you say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No comparison.  Facebook allows many things, Twitters only allows 45 characters or less. Twitters only allows what they want you to says and nothing more.  To much control on what you say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert MacMillan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2009/05/27/twitter-vs-facebook-you-make-the-call/comment-page-1/#comment-359123</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert MacMillan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 15:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=16983#comment-359123</guid>
		<description>Everybody&#039;s an editor...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everybody&#8217;s an editor&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otis Gospodnetic</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2009/05/27/twitter-vs-facebook-you-make-the-call/comment-page-1/#comment-359122</link>
		<dc:creator>Otis Gospodnetic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 15:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=16983#comment-359122</guid>
		<description>Twitter!

Note that I almost missed the question -- it hard to spot that question in the post above, broken up over 3 lines and wrapped around one of the pictures! :)
Ideas:
- bold the question itself, so it stands out more
- pose the question at the very beginning of the post, while you still have the attention of the reader (your target readers here are Facebook/Twitter users - people used to reading 140 character status updates, not 140+ word posts)
- ask the main question once again at the end and remind the reader his/her input is desired</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter!</p>
<p>Note that I almost missed the question &#8212; it hard to spot that question in the post above, broken up over 3 lines and wrapped around one of the pictures! <img src='http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Ideas:<br />
- bold the question itself, so it stands out more<br />
- pose the question at the very beginning of the post, while you still have the attention of the reader (your target readers here are Facebook/Twitter users &#8211; people used to reading 140 character status updates, not 140+ word posts)<br />
- ask the main question once again at the end and remind the reader his/her input is desired</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
