Comments on: New Internet ad technique can warn of emergencies

By: J D

J D — Sun, 28 Jun 2009 13:12:18 +0000

Hey Google you say you’re not Phorm… But are you connected to Feeva………!*!http://www.zdnetasia.com/news /internet/0,39044908,39256912-2,00.htm

By: Joe Bloggs

Joe Bloggs — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:40:39 +0000

Not nice to Big Brother are you?I’ve got a “Big Brother”, but when he looks when he shouldn’t do; he gets more than a flea in his ear!

By: AllTheQuotes

AllTheQuotes — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 10:38:42 +0000

Business is never so healthy as when, like a chicken, it must do a certain amount of scratching around for what it gets.-Henry FordBig Brother is watching.

By: J D

J D — Sun, 31 May 2009 13:01:28 +0000

Hey Feeva, Phorm, Nebuad, Front Porch et al why not try using a different Port/Socket or protocol so that anyone, Users or Websites, can properly Opt-in to such Services?!Port 80 is supposed to be for point to point (unicast) communications, without any “man in the middle” apparatus designed to alter/add to the communications.The direct result of interposing such systems compromises communications with respect to, both Personal & Business Confidentiality!

By: dmitri

dmitri — Sun, 31 May 2009 08:14:08 +0000

as soon as their adserver online, I’ll be happy to block them on my Squid server

By: Ian Kemmish

Ian Kemmish — Fri, 29 May 2009 16:43:14 +0000

Reverse natural selection!Smart people run ad blockers and so will die in the fire/plague/flood/earthquake. Dumb people and bloggers, who don’t run ad blockers, will see the alerts and escape. Or maybe their computers are so slow because of all those ads that they won’t see the alerts in time….

By: Jonah

Jonah — Fri, 29 May 2009 09:20:02 +0000

Feeva/Cisco also have a massive legal problem!This system “modifies” data “between” end points on a point to point communications system.The so called “innocuous tag” leads to other data being manipulated by third parties, either wanted or unwanted by a particular individual; this is unacceptable on any RELIABLE communications system.What FEEVA & others are trying to do is turn a “UNICAST” one to one communication channel, which often relies on confidentiality into a “BROADCAST” system WHICH IS USELESS FOR RELIABLE PERSONAL/BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS!

By: Jonah

Jonah — Thu, 28 May 2009 21:51:20 +0000

Just to add to my previous statement we already have Emergency Systems aka LOCAL RADIO, TELEVISION & even FLOOD ALERT SIRENS where necessary, we don’t need tracking just to deliver more Advertisements.That is what Feeva are about Advertising!!

By: Mike

Mike — Thu, 28 May 2009 21:32:03 +0000

No thanks!We don’t want to be profiled, categorised, zip coded and processed. We just want Internet access without any snooping!!!

By: Jonah

Jonah — Thu, 28 May 2009 21:17:43 +0000

IT IS STILL TRACKING PERSONAL DATA!When a zip code or other personally indentifiable data is “INSERTED” into the data flow for other “third parties” to ready a collation of data will allow frequently visited Websites or other agencies to identify & profile “individuals”GO AWAY FEEVA!!!