<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone Mystery: Why did Apple kill Google&#8217;s app?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2009/07/24/iphone-mystery-why-did-apple-kill-googles-app/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2009/07/24/iphone-mystery-why-did-apple-kill-googles-app/</link>
	<description>Where media and technology meet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 12:03:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Random Numbers</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2009/07/24/iphone-mystery-why-did-apple-kill-googles-app/comment-page-1/#comment-362161</link>
		<dc:creator>Random Numbers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 05:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=18409#comment-362161</guid>
		<description>&quot;“Is it just me or is Apple acting like the evil Microsoft by all of this tight control and rigidity?” wrote another.&quot;

So someone has finally noticed?  Apple has been a rigidly controlling company from the get-go.  Tight controls on hardware, software, and just about everything else to do with Apple have kept their market share for computers in the niche category since their inception.  It is M$ that has been flexible to a fault, making it much less secure but allowing more hardware and software flexibility in systems, thus making them cheaper.
In the handheld market, however, this rigidity is a good thing, making their iphone less likely to be destroyed by a third party app.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;“Is it just me or is Apple acting like the evil Microsoft by all of this tight control and rigidity?” wrote another.&#8221;</p>
<p>So someone has finally noticed?  Apple has been a rigidly controlling company from the get-go.  Tight controls on hardware, software, and just about everything else to do with Apple have kept their market share for computers in the niche category since their inception.  It is M$ that has been flexible to a fault, making it much less secure but allowing more hardware and software flexibility in systems, thus making them cheaper.<br />
In the handheld market, however, this rigidity is a good thing, making their iphone less likely to be destroyed by a third party app.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Page-Echols</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2009/07/24/iphone-mystery-why-did-apple-kill-googles-app/comment-page-1/#comment-362086</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Page-Echols</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 23:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=18409#comment-362086</guid>
		<description>Seems to me that this should just be rolled into the default Maps program on the iPhone anyway, no point in a 2nd app.  So Google should get Apple the info they need to update that program and call it good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me that this should just be rolled into the default Maps program on the iPhone anyway, no point in a 2nd app.  So Google should get Apple the info they need to update that program and call it good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
