<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times: Pay to play</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2009/08/05/financial-times-pay-to-play/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2009/08/05/financial-times-pay-to-play/</link>
	<description>Where media and technology meet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:00:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Kemmish</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2009/08/05/financial-times-pay-to-play/comment-page-1/#comment-362421</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Kemmish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 09:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=18614#comment-362421</guid>
		<description>Charging up front for content is very difficult - few papers can hold the line on quality these days.  I cancelled my WSJ subscription partly because the part of their website I needed (&quot;your portfolio&quot;) stopped working and their support people refused to fix it; but mostly because of the racist tone of their op-ed pieces.

One suspects the real cash cow will be the first paper which dares to introduce a system of micro-payments for &quot;Have Your Say&quot;ers.  Or even goes the whole hog and auctions off op-ed colum inches.  Who knows?  Drivel written rich nutters with an axe to grind may be even more entertaining what&#039;s printed there now....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charging up front for content is very difficult &#8211; few papers can hold the line on quality these days.  I cancelled my WSJ subscription partly because the part of their website I needed (&#8220;your portfolio&#8221;) stopped working and their support people refused to fix it; but mostly because of the racist tone of their op-ed pieces.</p>
<p>One suspects the real cash cow will be the first paper which dares to introduce a system of micro-payments for &#8220;Have Your Say&#8221;ers.  Or even goes the whole hog and auctions off op-ed colum inches.  Who knows?  Drivel written rich nutters with an axe to grind may be even more entertaining what&#8217;s printed there now&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
