Comments on: CBS and Pepsi bring you video ads — in your magazine

By: Marcia Warner

Marcia Warner — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:00:37 +0000

It may not be practical or all that viable, but it sure is cool…LOL

By: Mitchell Collins

Mitchell Collins — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:11:52 +0000

I think it is stupid, a waste of time, waste of money, and Unnecessary. Advertising is indeed meant to be ground breaking & pioneering but also viable & economical. This!?…isn’t.

By: Abhishek Datta

Abhishek Datta — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:18:03 +0000

one more attempt at foolish marketing… wastage of money and generation of e-waste

By: Robert Ziegler

Robert Ziegler — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:26:15 +0000

Esquire magazine did a ‘video’ cover last year: http://tinyurl.com/einkmag . I believe it was a world first. Their cover, however, was eInk, and had a couple black and white changing blinking images, not video. I can only imagine that this magazine will be very expensive in comparison… wonder whether it will also cost more on the newsstand?

By: Annie Cowing

Annie Cowing — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:02:07 +0000

What?! A video that plays tucked into a magazine?! For 40 minutes? What is that gonna cost? I mean the marketers? And this chip…I mean video-in-prin technology. Not enough information here.

By: johnD

johnD — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:47:34 +0000

Great, just what the world needs, more throw away electronics… and add insult to injury, all this to advertise TV shows and sugar water.