Comments on: $800 per family for 3D TV glasses? http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2010/01/13/800-per-family-for-3d-tv-glasses/ Where media and technology meet Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:23:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: kuraf http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2010/01/13/800-per-family-for-3d-tv-glasses/comment-page-1/#comment-389015 kuraf Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:10:15 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=20489#comment-389015 LG FPR 3D Glasses too provide family glasses at a lower rate.Today looking for the comfort and handy glasses the best choice is the FPR 3D Glasses which is free from flicker , no crosstalk image, no battery, comfortable watching at any position and above all health friendly too. LG FPR 3D Glasses too provide family glasses at a lower rate.Today looking for the comfort and handy glasses the best choice is the FPR 3D Glasses which is free from flicker , no crosstalk image, no battery, comfortable watching at any position and above all health friendly too.

]]> By: icuondatube http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2010/01/13/800-per-family-for-3d-tv-glasses/comment-page-1/#comment-386234 icuondatube Sat, 15 Jan 2011 03:22:33 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=20489#comment-386234 How about a DLP like Mitsubishi? Can I wear the cheapo theater glass then? How about a DLP like Mitsubishi? Can I wear the cheapo theater glass then?

]]> By: chuchylla http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2010/01/13/800-per-family-for-3d-tv-glasses/comment-page-1/#comment-377761 chuchylla Mon, 31 May 2010 09:21:29 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=20489#comment-377761 The math giving 1 in 4 from 12% is blindingly obvious, if you'll excuse the pun. A more pedantic version might say 22.56% of couples are likely to have at least one partner who does not have binocular vision. Can't comment on the 12% vs 5% figures, not knowing where these number came from... The math giving 1 in 4 from 12% is blindingly obvious, if you’ll excuse the pun. A more pedantic version might say 22.56% of couples are likely to have at least one partner who does not have binocular vision.
Can’t comment on the 12% vs 5% figures, not knowing where these number came from…

]]> By: dirn2000 http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2010/01/13/800-per-family-for-3d-tv-glasses/comment-page-1/#comment-372825 dirn2000 Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:28:53 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=20489#comment-372825 How exactly does 12% translate into 1 in 4 people? Despite your math, it's more like 5% of the population that does not have the binocular vision necessary to see the stereoscopic effect and that includes those who have lost an eye or with severe lazy eye or strabismus. Those without any severe conditions but with some sort of binocular vision problems STILL can train their eyes to see in stereo which usually is caught at an early age. How exactly does 12% translate into 1 in 4 people? Despite your math, it’s more like 5% of the population that does not have the binocular vision necessary to see the stereoscopic effect and that includes those who have lost an eye or with severe lazy eye or strabismus.

Those without any severe conditions but with some sort of binocular vision problems STILL can train their eyes to see in stereo which usually is caught at an early age.

]]> By: wildcatherder http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2010/01/13/800-per-family-for-3d-tv-glasses/comment-page-1/#comment-371802 wildcatherder Thu, 14 Jan 2010 03:58:48 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=20489#comment-371802 The 3D hype has come around about every 15 years since color movies first made motion 3D possible. Why is there never sustained popularity? It's very simple; approximately 12% of the population does not have binocular vision which is necessary to see the stereoscopic effect. With those odds, there's a one in four chance that your spouse is among those who cannot see 3D with shuttered lenses. An expensive new 3D TV is going to be a hard sell, if your life partner literally can't see it. The 3D hype has come around about every 15 years since color movies first made motion 3D possible. Why is there never sustained popularity? It’s very simple; approximately 12% of the population does not have binocular vision which is necessary to see the stereoscopic effect. With those odds, there’s a one in four chance that your spouse is among those who cannot see 3D with shuttered lenses. An expensive new 3D TV is going to be a hard sell, if your life partner literally can’t see it.

]]>