Hulu to charge? It’s getting closer…

April 22, 2010

Everybody loves free. But free has a price. And that price might just be $9.95 a month, according to The Los Angeles Times,  which writes that Hulu, the second most popular video site in the U.S, will soon start charging for a premium version of its site called Hulu Plus. We haven’t been able to confirm the details yet (Hulu’s staffers are sticking to the ol’ decline to comment). But rumors of premium version of Hulu have been doing the rounds for the last year. Back in October an NBC executive said the company was experimenting with various business models, including subscription content.

Let’s also not forget Hulu is soon to be a third owned by Comcast (through its ongoing acquisition of NBC) — which is not known for giving video programming away for free. Its other parents, News Corp and Disney, also aren’t known for their charity in the video programming business.

And it’s not just Hulu, YouTube has also started to experiment with pricing models and has indicated it would be open to subscription models if its content partners asked for it.

Still, how will consumers feel about paying to watch their favorite shows online? And is there any chance a premium Hulu, when it becomes partly owned by a cable company, will undermine the TV Everywhere project? TV Everywhere offers ‘free’ online TV if you’re already a paying cable subscriber.

And, hey, $9.95 is a lot less than the average $60 most cable companies charge for a standard cable video package.

2 comments

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

[...] Hulu to charge? It’s getting closer… – Reuters BlogsAnd that price might just be $9.95 a month, according to The Los Angeles Times,  which writes that Hulu , the second most popular video And it’s not just Hulu, YouTube has also started to experiment with pricing models and has indicated it [...]

Just because you can get away with charging for something doesn’t make it right, or even legal. Per FCC founding statute, you’re already paying for pristine delivery of commercial TV signals by sitting through their stupid ads. It’s either commercial-free, or it’s free.

So, cable and satellite companies all, give back the dough. And tune back the audio compression during ad breaks – that’s illegal too. Hulu, don’t go there.

Posted by HBC | Report as abusive

The audio compression is counter productive with me, I flip the channel immediately, and sometimes forget to come back.

Posted by libertadormg | Report as abusive