Thursday’s Media and Technology Roundup

July 1, 2010

GoogleGoogle faces pressure as China to decide on license-Reuters

“Google Inc could face further pressure for its other products in China as Beijing is due to decide whether or not to renew a license for the firm’s flagship search engine in the world’s largest Internet market,” writes Melanie Lee.

Cold War support for Russian ‘spies’ on networking site-Reuters

Patriotic, anti-American messages adorn the pages of two alleged Russian spies on Russia’s answer to Facebook, a reminder of historic suspicions and resentments that have survived the end of the Cold War,” reports Amie Ferris-Rotman.

Google AdWords lacks transparency: French regulator-Reuters

France’s antitrust regulator accused Google Inc of a lack of transparency over its keyword advertising service and ordered it to clarify conditions for the product within four months,” writes Foo Yun Chee.

Twitter musings in Syria elicit groans in Washington-NYTimes

“When two young State Department officials took a delegation of Silicon Valley executives to Syria recently, they billed it as a chance to use the promise of technology to reach out to a country with which the United States has long had icy relations. Instead, the visit will be remembered for a series of breezy Twitter messages that the two colleagues sent home,” reports Mark Landler.

Stores see Google as ally in e-book market-NYTimes

“Independent bookstores were battered first by discount chains like Barnes & Noble, then by superefficient Web retailers like Now the electronic book age is dawning. With this latest challenge, these stores will soon have a new ally: the search giant Google,” writes Brad Stone.

No comments so far

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see