<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Five backward-compatible forecasts for 2011</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2010/12/27/five-backward-compatible-forecasts-for-2011/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2010/12/27/five-backward-compatible-forecasts-for-2011/</link>
	<description>Where media and technology meet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:00:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: johncabell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2010/12/27/five-backward-compatible-forecasts-for-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-385477</link>
		<dc:creator>johncabell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 21:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=23736#comment-385477</guid>
		<description>@ginchinchili Well, I wouldn&#039;t say I missed it -- though it was news to me, I don&#039;t think it would have made my little tech/media list even if I had known about it.

I think this falls under promising, but wait and see. Having said that, it is a fascinating approach and I appreciate you bringing it to my attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ginchinchili Well, I wouldn&#8217;t say I missed it &#8212; though it was news to me, I don&#8217;t think it would have made my little tech/media list even if I had known about it.</p>
<p>I think this falls under promising, but wait and see. Having said that, it is a fascinating approach and I appreciate you bringing it to my attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ayang1001</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2010/12/27/five-backward-compatible-forecasts-for-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-385473</link>
		<dc:creator>Ayang1001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 17:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=23736#comment-385473</guid>
		<description>As for TV, The 3D TV is no difference from the Tube TV.
They are all the cable based TV.

The TV&#039;s next Big thing will be Internet TV. Internet TV will be next revolution of TV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for TV, The 3D TV is no difference from the Tube TV.<br />
They are all the cable based TV.</p>
<p>The TV&#8217;s next Big thing will be Internet TV. Internet TV will be next revolution of TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johncabell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2010/12/27/five-backward-compatible-forecasts-for-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-385458</link>
		<dc:creator>johncabell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 18:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=23736#comment-385458</guid>
		<description>&quot;Read it later&quot; was entirely desktop oriented until it launched an iPhone app in 2009. Why the delay? Developer Nate Weiner &quot;had a major moral issue with developing on a closed platform&quot; (http://readitlaterlist.com/blog/2009/08/reading-it-later-two-years-of-read-it-later/). Instapaper, instead, hitched its wagon to iOS -- and thus the mobile internet -- in a big way, and that it when the concept really caught fire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Read it later&#8221; was entirely desktop oriented until it launched an iPhone app in 2009. Why the delay? Developer Nate Weiner &#8220;had a major moral issue with developing on a closed platform&#8221; (<a href='http://readitlaterlist.com/blog/2009/08/reading-it-later-two-years-of-read-it-later/).'>http://readitlaterlist.com/blog/2009/08 &nbsp;/reading-it-later-two-years-of-read-it- later/).</a> Instapaper, instead, hitched its wagon to iOS &#8212; and thus the mobile internet &#8212; in a big way, and that it when the concept really caught fire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikeyish</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2010/12/27/five-backward-compatible-forecasts-for-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-385454</link>
		<dc:creator>mikeyish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 17:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=23736#comment-385454</guid>
		<description>Fact check: Read It Later was started in 2007 (before Instapaper) and has 3 million users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fact check: Read It Later was started in 2007 (before Instapaper) and has 3 million users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
