<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bill Keller&#8217;s war on the Internet keeps the Times down</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2011/05/19/bill-kellers-war-on-the-internet-keeps-the-times-down/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2011/05/19/bill-kellers-war-on-the-internet-keeps-the-times-down/</link>
	<description>Where media and technology meet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:23:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dbobsnodgrass</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2011/05/19/bill-kellers-war-on-the-internet-keeps-the-times-down/comment-page-1/#comment-388465</link>
		<dc:creator>dbobsnodgrass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 21:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=26014#comment-388465</guid>
		<description>#TwitterMakesYouStupid Discuss.  My comment didn&#039;t show up @nytimes, or my &quot;User Account Banned&quot; - ? @BostonPhoenix 

Thanks to @whet  @ The 312 - Chicago and “The New York Times’s Bill Keller comes to bury Twitter…” http://bit.ly/iA8xeY

Best of all, @psychcentral  -  &quot;Psychology and mental health information and support...&quot; and &quot;8 Reasons Why Twitter Can Make You Happy&quot; http://bit.ly/jDLTHY

Perhaps, Mr. Keller is just using one of the world&#039;s first social networks - gossip!?

Bill Keller @nytkeller view full profile → 21 Tweets 130 Following 19,413 Followers 872 Listed Executive (((#Twitter #disabilities))) Editor – The New York Times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#TwitterMakesYouStupid Discuss.  My comment didn&#8217;t show up @nytimes, or my &#8220;User Account Banned&#8221; &#8211; ? @BostonPhoenix </p>
<p>Thanks to @whet  @ The 312 &#8211; Chicago and “The New York Times’s Bill Keller comes to bury Twitter…” <a href='http://bit.ly/iA8xeY'>http://bit.ly/iA8xeY</a></p>
<p>Best of all, @psychcentral  &#8211;  &#8220;Psychology and mental health information and support&#8230;&#8221; and &#8220;8 Reasons Why Twitter Can Make You Happy&#8221; <a href='http://bit.ly/jDLTHY'>http://bit.ly/jDLTHY</a></p>
<p>Perhaps, Mr. Keller is just using one of the world&#8217;s first social networks &#8211; gossip!?</p>
<p>Bill Keller @nytkeller view full profile → 21 Tweets 130 Following 19,413 Followers 872 Listed Executive (((#Twitter #disabilities))) Editor – The New York Times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jjbb</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2011/05/19/bill-kellers-war-on-the-internet-keeps-the-times-down/comment-page-1/#comment-388460</link>
		<dc:creator>jjbb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 14:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=26014#comment-388460</guid>
		<description>I used to work at the Times and at one company-wide meeting Keller gave a 10 minute speech on why the Times format is better than blogs. No thought to the fact that there are blogs on NYTimes.com or that the two can co-exist. Regardless of his labored attempts to embrace the Web, he is an old school journalist, wistful for the &quot;good old days&quot; of one-way editorial communication and will never fully get the Web. That&#039;s why they need to replace him with someone who truly buys into the Web. But to do that, senior management would have to as well, and they don&#039;t. They just pay lip service to it and will never embrace it fully themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to work at the Times and at one company-wide meeting Keller gave a 10 minute speech on why the Times format is better than blogs. No thought to the fact that there are blogs on NYTimes.com or that the two can co-exist. Regardless of his labored attempts to embrace the Web, he is an old school journalist, wistful for the &#8220;good old days&#8221; of one-way editorial communication and will never fully get the Web. That&#8217;s why they need to replace him with someone who truly buys into the Web. But to do that, senior management would have to as well, and they don&#8217;t. They just pay lip service to it and will never embrace it fully themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michaelm1</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2011/05/19/bill-kellers-war-on-the-internet-keeps-the-times-down/comment-page-1/#comment-388437</link>
		<dc:creator>Michaelm1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 00:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=26014#comment-388437</guid>
		<description>&quot;While having brunch with an ex-Times employee in January she said to me &#039;we weren’t allowed to read the Huffington Post—they say it’s the least reliable source on the Internet.&#039;&quot;

Should we infer that the New York Times feels the user-generated content on Wikipedia is more reliable and stable than the edited content on Huffington Post?

Where do Times reporters turn for their research?  I&#039;m not sure I can handle the truth of the matter.  Thank Goodness I don&#039;t get my news from the Times (or the HuffPost or Wikiepedia).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;While having brunch with an ex-Times employee in January she said to me &#8216;we weren’t allowed to read the Huffington Post—they say it’s the least reliable source on the Internet.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>Should we infer that the New York Times feels the user-generated content on Wikipedia is more reliable and stable than the edited content on Huffington Post?</p>
<p>Where do Times reporters turn for their research?  I&#8217;m not sure I can handle the truth of the matter.  Thank Goodness I don&#8217;t get my news from the Times (or the HuffPost or Wikiepedia).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: resinaus</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2011/05/19/bill-kellers-war-on-the-internet-keeps-the-times-down/comment-page-1/#comment-388427</link>
		<dc:creator>resinaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 20:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=26014#comment-388427</guid>
		<description>Re: &quot;But this begs the question:&quot; -- so you are saying that for an assertion the conclusion is implicitly included in the premises?  I think you have used this phrase incorrectly...  http://bit.ly/aCtKJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: &#8220;But this begs the question:&#8221; &#8212; so you are saying that for an assertion the conclusion is implicitly included in the premises?  I think you have used this phrase incorrectly&#8230;  <a href='http://bit.ly/aCtKJ'>http://bit.ly/aCtKJ</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
