<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The future is calling, AT&amp;T, and it&#8217;s not T-Mobile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2011/09/02/future-is-calling-att-t-mobile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2011/09/02/future-is-calling-att-t-mobile/</link>
	<description>Where media and technology meet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 10:42:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ilike10s</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2011/09/02/future-is-calling-att-t-mobile/comment-page-1/#comment-390334</link>
		<dc:creator>ilike10s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 13:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=29206#comment-390334</guid>
		<description>The issue is not the demand for bandwidth, it&#039;s that people don&#039;t really pay much attention to network quality when they buy a phone.  They pay attention to price, and device type.  That&#039;s why Verizon isn&#039;t stealing millions of customers from AT&amp;T despite a much better network.  Thus, it doesn&#039;t make sense to make a massive investment in network quality because the subscriber growth won&#039;t justify it.  Instead, they can run the network at the minimum possible service level and rake in money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The issue is not the demand for bandwidth, it&#8217;s that people don&#8217;t really pay much attention to network quality when they buy a phone.  They pay attention to price, and device type.  That&#8217;s why Verizon isn&#8217;t stealing millions of customers from AT&#038;T despite a much better network.  Thus, it doesn&#8217;t make sense to make a massive investment in network quality because the subscriber growth won&#8217;t justify it.  Instead, they can run the network at the minimum possible service level and rake in money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M.C.McBride</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2011/09/02/future-is-calling-att-t-mobile/comment-page-1/#comment-390331</link>
		<dc:creator>M.C.McBride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 03:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=29206#comment-390331</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if I agree with your thesis, but it would be great for the economy if AT&amp;T executives took your advice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if I agree with your thesis, but it would be great for the economy if AT&#038;T executives took your advice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ultramayan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2011/09/02/future-is-calling-att-t-mobile/comment-page-1/#comment-390329</link>
		<dc:creator>Ultramayan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 23:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=29206#comment-390329</guid>
		<description>The future is bandwidth. He who has the most to sell of it wins!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The future is bandwidth. He who has the most to sell of it wins!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GSH10</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2011/09/02/future-is-calling-att-t-mobile/comment-page-1/#comment-390326</link>
		<dc:creator>GSH10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 20:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=29206#comment-390326</guid>
		<description>Well said, buying is not innovation in a market worth betting the farm on. As far as monopolizing, Verizon would have to roll over dead, and take T-Mobile with them. 

Unfortunately, monopoly through power is in AT&amp;T&#039;s DNA and they need genetic surgery to implant ingenuity into their genome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, buying is not innovation in a market worth betting the farm on. As far as monopolizing, Verizon would have to roll over dead, and take T-Mobile with them. </p>
<p>Unfortunately, monopoly through power is in AT&#038;T&#8217;s DNA and they need genetic surgery to implant ingenuity into their genome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
