Tech wrap: Verizon backtracks on $2 fee

December 30, 2011

Verizon Wireless has reversed its decision to charge a $2 fee for one-time telephone and online bill payments after a storm of criticism from consumers and the U.S. communications regulator.

Occupy protesters say they are making their own Facebook, reports.

If the last decade was all about open source, the next decade will be about open APIs. However, as with open source, APIs aren’t necessarily a guarantee of billions in the bank, Matt Asay writes in The Register.

“As baffling as it may seem, HP was trying to rid itself of Palm without taking a loss on its purchase”, a source with knowledge of the negotiations told MobileBeat.


One comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see

I really am at a loss to understand Verizon’s decision. The announcement of a $2 “convenience fee” ( everything-you-need-to-know-about-credit -card-convenience-fees) and its renouncement on the following day must be one of the dumbest business moves of 2011 in a very strong field.

What were the Verizon guys thinking? This $2 fee looks to a customer exactly the way BofA’s $5 debit card fee did a couple of months ago when it caused a huge backlash, prompting the bank to quickly scrap it (but not before the damage to its reputation, such as it was, was already done). I would’ve expected no one to try anything remotely resembling such a fee for at least a couple of years. As I said, I’m at a loss.

Posted by D.D.D. | Report as abusive