<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tech wrap: Netflix gets subscribers back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2012/01/25/tech-wrap-netflix-gets-subscribers-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2012/01/25/tech-wrap-netflix-gets-subscribers-back/</link>
	<description>Where media and technology meet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 01:23:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: azman90</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2012/01/25/tech-wrap-netflix-gets-subscribers-back/comment-page-1/#comment-391285</link>
		<dc:creator>azman90</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 02:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=33350#comment-391285</guid>
		<description>You are aware that NFLX actually lost over 300K paid streamers and 2M paid DVD users. 

The total gains were around 13K, nowhere near the 600K your article is touting.

Free subscribers are not actual subscribers-- this is a VERY misleading report by Netflix. Borderline fraudulent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are aware that NFLX actually lost over 300K paid streamers and 2M paid DVD users. </p>
<p>The total gains were around 13K, nowhere near the 600K your article is touting.</p>
<p>Free subscribers are not actual subscribers&#8211; this is a VERY misleading report by Netflix. Borderline fraudulent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
