MediaFile

A looking glass into the post-smartphone era

April 5, 2012

Permit me to not act my age.

I was all grown up already when the Internet became a big deal, scarcely two decades ago. I was like a kid in a candy store. Still, I’ve only had a couple of heart-stopping moments in those 20 years in which everything has changed.

My heart skipped a beat (along with probably only thousands of others) when I downloaded Mosaic, the first Web browser, on the first day it was released. It consistently froze up. But that small, terribly flawed piece of software was really a time portal, showing me the future, and I could barely breathe.

Two years ago I got my hands on the first iPad on the first day it went on sale. My unboxing was unceremonious because I had to rush and show it off during a couple of TV interviews. But when I got home late on that Saturday in April and finally had a chance to put it through its paces, it took my breath away. I was a kid again: full of wonder and utterly immune to negativity.

Call me childish, but I had the same primal reaction to the video, and the reporting of my Wired colleague Steven Levy, on Google’s Project Glass. As Levy writes, Project Glass is “an augmented reality system that will give users the full range of activities performed with a smartphone – without the smartphone. Instead, you wear some sort of geeky prosthetic (one of those pictured is reminiscent of the visor that Geordi La Forge wore on Star Trek: The Next Generation, but Google has also been experimenting with a version that piggybacks on regular spectacles).”

The augmented reality features in Glass aren’t new. Bionic Eye brought AR to the iPhone in 2009: You held up the phone at eye level and nearby points of interest floated through the camera’s lens. Sekai Camera, an augmented reality smartphone app, not only provides a heads-up display of information but also adds a social element. Yelp tossed in Monocle, another augmented reality feature, as an Easter egg in its app. Heck, in December 2009 Wired highlighted the seven best augmented reality apps for iPhone and Android.

Some people who actually pay close attention to these things say we are maybe a generation away from commercial, indispensable AR glasses. Project Glass isn’t even in beta, and there is no word when that might occur.

But here is what I saw when I peered into Project Glass: a glimpse into a post-smartphone future. I have no idea if the project, from Google’s pure research Google (x) division, will make it out of the lab. Or if someone else will beat them to it in a big commercial way. Or if people will take to wearing these glasses with any more fervor than they have those home 3D specs. Or if pesky legislators will ban them after someone gets hit by a bus while looking at a pop-up display instead of oncoming traffic.

But the key to innovation is the identification of friction – the stupid things that slow you down, like extra clicks, deep menus and rotary dialers – and the acceleration of convenience: dissolving real pain barriers, even as those barriers recede into barely perceptible speed bumps. This is not only why smartphones and tablets took off but also why Apple’s devices in particular do so well. Ease of use, intuitive transitions, “obvious” functionality: Victory goes to he who paves the smoothest path to the task at hand.

None of this will happen tomorrow. But something tells me we are witnessing a new paradigm. I went out on a limb a couple of years ago and argued that tablets could be the smartphone killer. So far this bold prediction hasn’t come true. But I can see how easy it would be to slip on some transitions glasses – clear glass or prescription – and have that be our connection with the outside world instead of a mini-computer in our pockets.

PHOTO: Wearing a Google Glass visor. Google/handout.

Comments
4 comments so far | RSS Comments RSS

“But something tells me we are witnessing a new paradigm”

I agree John. I also found the linked article, which points out the challenges to usable AR glasses, well thought out and interesting.

But the genie is clearly out of the bottle. There is a buzz around this and people are clearly very excited.

Which makes me wonder – why did Google release the video now? Perhaps in part it is to gauge the interest in the project and figure out how much money and resources to devote to the program? You can measure the buzz now – just look at your Tag Cloud.

No that we’ve seen it, this isn’t going to take 20 years.

Posted by nakanoalien | Report as abusive
 

These electronic devices when used in a moving vehicle are dangerous.

People cannot pay attention to the device and drive at the same time.

Now, people using these glasses will have even less incentive to pay attention to what is happening around them.

What makes you think we “need” this to further impair our senses while walking or driving?

Yes, you are being childish.

Posted by PseudoTurtle | Report as abusive
 

Why the sense of wonder? This is no different from that IBM TV commercial which aired in the mid-to-late 1990;s: the one with the Wall Street Trader concluding a trade using his AR spectacles whilst sitting on the steps of St Marks Square in Venice. If you were going to feel wonder at this absurd concept, surely you should have felt it then?

The only difference is that now we know that walking along the pavement avoid those rude and stupid enough to think they can walk and text at the same time is as difficult as it is annoying. In the 1990′s, we could only guess that would be the case. When you can’t even see who’s texting because they’re not carrying a phone, dealing with these people will be an order of magnitude worse than it is already.

Posted by Ian_Kemmish | Report as abusive
 

Amazing,Amazing and Amazing.

Posted by Ismailtaimur | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/