<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple in miniature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2012/10/24/apple-in-miniature/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2012/10/24/apple-in-miniature/</link>
	<description>Where media and technology meet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:23:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tangogo68</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2012/10/24/apple-in-miniature/comment-page-1/#comment-432511</link>
		<dc:creator>tangogo68</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 02:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=35952#comment-432511</guid>
		<description>Are we sure that with the mobile market moving inexorably towards maturity and saturation we will continue to expect companies to have deep bags of tricks ? -- most phone users, most tablet users, and most computer users are not heavily into gaming, and do not feel pressured to always be racing after tech pecs -- if a device has a high quality screen that is easy on the eyes, and a fast processor that is quick to perform tasks, then wouldn&#039;t the dominant concerns and enduring desires be around build quality and platform stability, and privacy and security ? -- I admit I am an old man (approaching mid-40s) and an old Mac user (since the 1980s), and I &#039;suffer&#039;  with an old iPhone 4 and iPad 1, but I care less and less about pixels and gigahertz, and just get on with using my devices as tools (work) and toys (play) -- I&#039;m impressed with the directions Microsoft is moving in, and think their new OS and tablet look stable and strong and quite appealing, but I am glad I am not in the Android world where a new bit of kit arrives every other minute, almost as fast as the malware afflicting it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are we sure that with the mobile market moving inexorably towards maturity and saturation we will continue to expect companies to have deep bags of tricks ? &#8212; most phone users, most tablet users, and most computer users are not heavily into gaming, and do not feel pressured to always be racing after tech pecs &#8212; if a device has a high quality screen that is easy on the eyes, and a fast processor that is quick to perform tasks, then wouldn&#8217;t the dominant concerns and enduring desires be around build quality and platform stability, and privacy and security ? &#8212; I admit I am an old man (approaching mid-40s) and an old Mac user (since the 1980s), and I &#8216;suffer&#8217;  with an old iPhone 4 and iPad 1, but I care less and less about pixels and gigahertz, and just get on with using my devices as tools (work) and toys (play) &#8212; I&#8217;m impressed with the directions Microsoft is moving in, and think their new OS and tablet look stable and strong and quite appealing, but I am glad I am not in the Android world where a new bit of kit arrives every other minute, almost as fast as the malware afflicting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
