<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Facebook Doctrine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2012/11/23/the-facebook-doctrine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2012/11/23/the-facebook-doctrine/</link>
	<description>Where media and technology meet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 16:25:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jo5319</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2012/11/23/the-facebook-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-437038</link>
		<dc:creator>jo5319</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 02:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=35994#comment-437038</guid>
		<description>&quot;What&#039;s good for Facebook is good for you&quot;?

Yeah, more or less.

So many have invested in Facebook, either directly or through their 401Ks, every one of these investors want FaceBook stock to rise again. That&#039;s a lot of goodwill, going for Facebook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What&#8217;s good for Facebook is good for you&#8221;?</p>
<p>Yeah, more or less.</p>
<p>So many have invested in Facebook, either directly or through their 401Ks, every one of these investors want FaceBook stock to rise again. That&#8217;s a lot of goodwill, going for Facebook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ARJTurgot2</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2012/11/23/the-facebook-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-437036</link>
		<dc:creator>ARJTurgot2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 00:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=35994#comment-437036</guid>
		<description>Zuckerberg is already history.  He got lucky, made lots of money, and unless someone else takes over the company we have already seen the day that facebook had any relevance.   Don&#039;t know what comes next, but in a day when Microsoft is firing its no. 2, a shell of Sun is owned by Oracle, Meg has totally cratered HP, this kid had nothing in store for the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zuckerberg is already history.  He got lucky, made lots of money, and unless someone else takes over the company we have already seen the day that facebook had any relevance.   Don&#8217;t know what comes next, but in a day when Microsoft is firing its no. 2, a shell of Sun is owned by Oracle, Meg has totally cratered HP, this kid had nothing in store for the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danielcamalloy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2012/11/23/the-facebook-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-437029</link>
		<dc:creator>danielcamalloy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 13:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=35994#comment-437029</guid>
		<description>The arrogance of the intellectuals should not be surprising to the unwashed masses. Whether academic, medical, business, political and , yes, the media. They all know what is best for the plebs. Until it all falls apart and then they blame it on everyone else. Pride goes before a fall and they all fall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The arrogance of the intellectuals should not be surprising to the unwashed masses. Whether academic, medical, business, political and , yes, the media. They all know what is best for the plebs. Until it all falls apart and then they blame it on everyone else. Pride goes before a fall and they all fall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randburg100</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2012/11/23/the-facebook-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-437027</link>
		<dc:creator>randburg100</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 06:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=35994#comment-437027</guid>
		<description>Who in their right mind uses Farcebook.....??? Putting all your personal information, pictures at the disposal of some yank kid who few people really know??

Would you hand over the same data to say, China? North Korea...your own government?? No? Then why to some little kiddie, who will sift it and sell it...????? If that isn&#039;t a text book definition of stupidity - I fail to see  what is!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who in their right mind uses Farcebook&#8230;..??? Putting all your personal information, pictures at the disposal of some yank kid who few people really know??</p>
<p>Would you hand over the same data to say, China? North Korea&#8230;your own government?? No? Then why to some little kiddie, who will sift it and sell it&#8230;????? If that isn&#8217;t a text book definition of stupidity &#8211; I fail to see  what is!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coop82</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2012/11/23/the-facebook-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-437026</link>
		<dc:creator>Coop82</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 05:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=35994#comment-437026</guid>
		<description>In response to your last statement in the first paragraph &quot; Don’t want people to be able to easily access all your pictures from your Web browser? Too bad.&quot;: this is not entirely true. Instagram/facebook has enabled a privacy option which makes your account private.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to your last statement in the first paragraph &#8221; Don’t want people to be able to easily access all your pictures from your Web browser? Too bad.&#8221;: this is not entirely true. Instagram/facebook has enabled a privacy option which makes your account private.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vueidea</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2012/11/23/the-facebook-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-437017</link>
		<dc:creator>vueidea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2012 17:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=35994#comment-437017</guid>
		<description>The attributes of stewardship and self-directed excellence are beyond the stone-age markers of &#039;voting&#039; for matters that are more than trivial.

Institutions that embrace stewardship and excellence, are inherently sustainable beyond the myopic directions steeped in self-propagation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The attributes of stewardship and self-directed excellence are beyond the stone-age markers of &#8216;voting&#8217; for matters that are more than trivial.</p>
<p>Institutions that embrace stewardship and excellence, are inherently sustainable beyond the myopic directions steeped in self-propagation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cottereaux</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2012/11/23/the-facebook-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-437014</link>
		<dc:creator>Cottereaux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2012 17:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=35994#comment-437014</guid>
		<description>Facebook actually creates &quot;member&quot; profiles, how can anyone actually believe they have a billion real users? get real!

most recently FB created profiles of &quot;couples&quot; from members who say they are a couple. two single profiles = 1 couple profile. and of course that new couple profile is counted in that billion member number. 

many profiles on FB are fake, created by FB and or underage (below 13 years old).  the EU has a report out on that. not to mention members who have not logged into FB for over a year. 

no one has called FB on this!  none of this was mentioned in their SEC IPO filing. the SEC should investigate since ad revenue is being charged based upon the number of &quot;members&quot; using FB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook actually creates &#8220;member&#8221; profiles, how can anyone actually believe they have a billion real users? get real!</p>
<p>most recently FB created profiles of &#8220;couples&#8221; from members who say they are a couple. two single profiles = 1 couple profile. and of course that new couple profile is counted in that billion member number. </p>
<p>many profiles on FB are fake, created by FB and or underage (below 13 years old).  the EU has a report out on that. not to mention members who have not logged into FB for over a year. </p>
<p>no one has called FB on this!  none of this was mentioned in their SEC IPO filing. the SEC should investigate since ad revenue is being charged based upon the number of &#8220;members&#8221; using FB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shadician</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2012/11/23/the-facebook-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-436999</link>
		<dc:creator>Shadician</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 23:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=35994#comment-436999</guid>
		<description>The customers are always right? I&#039;m sure Facebook agrees. It&#039;s just a shame the users aren&#039;t its customers...advertisers are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The customers are always right? I&#8217;m sure Facebook agrees. It&#8217;s just a shame the users aren&#8217;t its customers&#8230;advertisers are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
