<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nielsen: the past, the present, but not the future of TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2013/02/22/nielsen-the-past-the-present-but-not-the-future-of-tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2013/02/22/nielsen-the-past-the-present-but-not-the-future-of-tv/</link>
	<description>Where media and technology meet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:23:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ptiffany</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2013/02/22/nielsen-the-past-the-present-but-not-the-future-of-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-442857</link>
		<dc:creator>ptiffany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 19:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=36319#comment-442857</guid>
		<description>It was well over ten years ago when talking with one of the Viacom Partners that he pointed out that young people were then spending more time on the InterNet than regular TV.  Now, that applies to the majority of people, even seniors to some degree.

Nielsen is becoming somewhat like newspapers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was well over ten years ago when talking with one of the Viacom Partners that he pointed out that young people were then spending more time on the InterNet than regular TV.  Now, that applies to the majority of people, even seniors to some degree.</p>
<p>Nielsen is becoming somewhat like newspapers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gee.la</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2013/02/22/nielsen-the-past-the-present-but-not-the-future-of-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-442845</link>
		<dc:creator>gee.la</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 00:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=36319#comment-442845</guid>
		<description>I am using Apple TV to watch the music programme from www.medici.tv. It is easy to navigate and to control with an iPad. Although the image quality is not satisfied, the sound is acceptable. It is cheap and valuable and the music contents are abundant. I believe it is a miniature for the future TV. The future of TV shall be manifold, from a variety of sources to satisfy different people&#039;s needs. Don&#039;t dream one channel covers all. Obviously, many businesses are compete each other for the ultimate portal to the channels of contents. Who controls the portal, controls the content delivery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am using Apple TV to watch the music programme from <a href='http://www.medici.tv.'>http://www.medici.tv.</a> It is easy to navigate and to control with an iPad. Although the image quality is not satisfied, the sound is acceptable. It is cheap and valuable and the music contents are abundant. I believe it is a miniature for the future TV. The future of TV shall be manifold, from a variety of sources to satisfy different people&#8217;s needs. Don&#8217;t dream one channel covers all. Obviously, many businesses are compete each other for the ultimate portal to the channels of contents. Who controls the portal, controls the content delivery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tougar</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2013/02/22/nielsen-the-past-the-present-but-not-the-future-of-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-442836</link>
		<dc:creator>tougar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 22:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/?p=36319#comment-442836</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe their archaic method is still relied upon today for accurate viewership information. 22K people extrapolated over the entire population? Reminds me of election polls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe their archaic method is still relied upon today for accurate viewership information. 22K people extrapolated over the entire population? Reminds me of election polls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
