Reuters Blogs

MediaFile

Where media and technology meet

April 28th, 2009

Hulu breaks into top 3 US video sites

Posted by: Alexei Oreskovic

Hulu continues its rapid ascent up the video charts, cracking the top three online video sites in the U.S. for the first time in March.

Some 380 million videos were viewed on Hulu.com, up 14.3 percent from February, according to market research firm comScore.

That allowed the NBC Universal and News Corp joint venture to steal the No.3 spot from Yahoo, whose total number of videos viewed in March actually declined by roughly 5 percent from February. Hulu held a 2.6 percent share of the 14.5 billion videos viewed in the U.S. last month.

Hulu has seen its popularity grow following TV ads that ran during the Super Bowl in January. In December, it was the No.7 ranked video site in the U.S.

Impressive as Hulu’s growth has been, the site is still not even in the same universe as YouTube, owned by Google. Google remained the No.1 video site in March, according to comScore, with 5.9 billion videos viewed, for a 40.9 percent market share.

Fox Interactive Media, owner of MySpace, held on to its spot as the No.2 place for online vids, although its market share shrank from 3.5 percent in February to 3 percent in March.

April 3rd, 2009

Could Google buy Twitter? Ask Arrington, then ask Swisher

Posted by: Robert MacMillan

We sprinkled updates into this blog. We’re highlighting them like this.

Thanks to TechCrunch, U.S. tech reporters are about to spend another weekend working instead of playing. UPDATE: Or maybe Kara Swisher at All Things D will save them!

Two sources told proprietor Michael Arrington that Google “is in late stage negotiations to acquire Twitter.” He wrote:

We don’t know the price but can assume its well, well north of the $250 million valuation that they saw in their recent funding.

Twitter turned down an offer to be bought by Facebook just a few months ago for half a billion dollars, although that was based partially on overvalued Facebook stock. Google would be paying in cash and/or publicly valued stock, which is equivalent to cash. So whatever the final acquisition value might be, it can’t be compared apples-to-apples with the Facebook deal.

Why would Google want Twitter? We’ve been arguing for some time that Twitter’s real value is in search. It holds the keys to the best real time database and search engine on the Internet, and Google doesn’t even have a horse in the game.

Later, he updated his entry to say that another source told him talks are at an early stage and could amount to a deal to build a Google real-time search engine. Who knows how this one will shake out. Web operations like Twitter can’t get popular without people starting to fit puzzle pieces together to see which company ought to buy them. That might be why The San Francisco Business Times picked up Wired and Industry Standard founder John Battelle’s blog entry that Twitter would go to Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp for $750 million. Turns out it was an April Fool’s joke.

Then Swisher at All Things D said this:

While the “news” that Google was in “late-stage” talks to acquire Twitter, which TechCrunch reported last night, certainly sounds exciting, it isn’t accurate in any way, according to a number of sources BoomTown spoke to close to the situation.

She also covered herself with a “to-be-sure graf,” as hacks like me call them:

Google or anyone else could plunk down more than $1 billion in cash and I cannot imagine Twitter’s investors would or could resist. Nor should they. And, what if, for example, Microsoft (MSFT) offered some huge cash payday for Twitter? In that case, I am certain Google would jump into the face-off, backing up a giant Brinks trunk to the door of Twitter’s San Francisco offices.

Afterward, everyone scratched their heads and ruminated mightily about this very important situation. TechCrunch, meanwhile, stands by its story, a blogger there told us.

Keep an eye on:

  • MediaNews Group, the Denver-based newspaper publisher run by legendary hyper-acquirer “Lean Dean” Singleton, worked out a deal with creditors on paying off its heavy debt that Singleton put on the company as he bought and bought and bought newspapers (before slashing and slashing their budgets and staff). And he said bankruptcy wasn’t an issue. (The New York Times)
  • Some people who work with him have told me that New York Times Executive Editor Bill Keller comes off as arrogant, but he’s actually shy. This is the same shy man who at Stanford University on Thursday said CNN’s reporting has been replaced by juries of commentators who work on a set that looks like a parody of a Daily Show parody of a news set. He also said saving The New York Times ranks with saving Darfur as a high-minded cause. From my own interactions with Keller, I would conclude that he’s a deadpan comic, not shy. (Politico)
  • TMZ.com is devoting more money to reporting gossip from Washington, D.C. Why flack this now? Is it because parent company Time Warner is geeking out at the cable show in DC this week? Maybe TMZ’s Harvey Levin bunked up with Time Warner Chief Executive Jeff Bewkes to save money in the downturn. OK, maybe not. (Reuters)
  • In case you didn’t know already, you should not get news for free online. Rupert said so. (Please ignore this free blog entry on this free website). It shouldn’t work for online TV either, said Discovery Chief Executive David Zaslav. (PaidContent)

(Photo: Reuters)

March 19th, 2009

March Madness: The great CBS experiment

Posted by: Paul Thomasch

Get your brackets filled out, hand over a few bucks to the office pool manager, and settle in for some March Madness. The NCAA basketball tournament starts today.

Besides terrific basketball, the next two weeks will showcase what is a great paring of old and new media by CBS. Give the folks over at CBS credit, they’ve done a tip-top job of bringing the games to both your television set and your computer.

(In 1999, CBS acquired the rights to 11 years of broadcasting the tournament, paying about $6 billion. It also has the exclusive online rights.)

But this is where the big question comes into play. Will CBS’s first-rate online coverage cannibalize its television audience? And does it matter, particularly if advertisers are buying package deals? This is the sort of the thing media executives — worried about their own balancing act between old and new media — have been trying to figure out for years.

Here’s the Breakingviews.com take on it:

The growth of online video is similarly problematic for CBS. True, it owns the Internet rights to the tournament. And it expects online video revenue to increase 20 percent this year to $30 million. If the company can make extra money from online video while keeping its TV revenue steady, its not-very-lucrative rights contract could still turn into a moneymaker.

But online revenue could come at the expense of the company’s cash cow, its television business. Last year, the tournament averaged 10 percent fewer viewers than in 2004, according to Nielsen.

Keep an eye on:

  • Cisco Systems is buying digital camcorder-maker Pure Digital Technologies as it seeks to push further into the consumer market (Reuters)
  • Microsoft is set to publicly launch Internet Explorer 8 early on Thursday, the latest version of its market-dominating Web browser (Reuters)

(Photo: Reuters)

January 5th, 2009

Hulu keeps bringing in the fans, even without Sarah Palin

Posted by: Yinka Adegoke

After jumping to become the sixth most viewed online U.S. video site in October, Hulu managed to keep its spot in November despite not having the benefit of a Sarah Palin/Tina Fey boost from Saturday Night Live

Hulu is the new star of the rapid growth of online video as a mainstream media in U.S. New comScore data shows more than 77 percent of all U.S. Internet users watched online video.  

YouTube is, of course, the most watched video site by quite a stretch, with more than 12 billion videos watched. Fox Interactive Media (mostly MySpace) stands at No.2 with 439 million; Viacom Digital has 325 million and Yahoo next with 304 million. Microsoft had 296 million.

Hulu had 227 million videos viewed and maintained its highest position even though several commentators had expected Hulu’s boost would fade after the election. It’s also interesting because unlike YouTube, Hulu has managed to populate most of its mix of TV shows and old movies with advertising. This may be annoying to some online viewers but it is widely admired in the digital advertising world.

The slick site, owned by News Corp and NBC Universal, keeps winning friends and fans across the board. The New York TImes on Sunday, for instance, professed its love thus:

On Hulu, you can also watch full-screen, in nice, rolling high-resolution. After years of watching YouTube, I thought I had stopped caring about glamorous presentation. But man: the neatness and elegance of Hulu — where you can watch hundreds of whole shows from NBC, Fox and other networks, as well as movie and news clips — is so relaxing.

Top U.S. Online Video Properties* by Videos Viewed November 2008

Total U.S. – Home/Work/University Locations

Source: comScore Video Metrix


Property                    Videos        Share (%) of

                             (000)           Videos

Total Internet            12,677,063         100.0

Google Sites               5,107,302          40.3

Fox Interactive Media        439,091           3.5

Viacom Digital               324,903           2.6

Yahoo! Sites                 304,331           2.4

Microsoft Sites              296,285           2.3

Hulu                         226,540           1.8

Turner Network               214,709           1.7

Disney Online                137,165           1.1

AOL LLC                      115,306           0.9

ESPN                          95,622           0.8
*Rankings based on video content sites; excludes video server networks.  Online video includes both streaming and progressive download video.

October 8th, 2008

YouTube gets into online shopping

Posted by: Yinka Adegoke

thriller-video.jpgYouTube, which has nailed the science of online video sharing, is now getting into online shopping by partnering with the likes of Amazon.com and iTunes.

The shop links will be just below the YouTube clips and will eventually sell a wide variety of items and merchandise related to the millions of clips on the site including: MP3s, TV shows, movies, concert tickets, books, maybe, even buy the designer sunglasses your favorite star is wearing in a clip. 

So soon you’ll be able to buy the Michael Jackson song playing in the background while watching the hilarious clip of Filipino prisoners doing their reenactment of the ’Thriller’ video. 

How will YouTube know if it’s a Michael Jackson song? Executives told Reuters they have a pretty nifty video and audio ID system that helps identify songs and video clips. If the song publisher or movie producer wants they can jointly share in the revenue from the advertising generated around such content.

Keep an eye on:

  • Troubled New Jersey newspaper The Star-Ledger will not be sold after one of its unions agreed to concessions (Reuters)
  • John Lennon’s widow Yoko Ono and EMI Records have dropped copyright infringement lawsuits against documentary makers for using ‘Imagine’ (Reuters)
  •  Former New Yorker editor Tina Brown has teamed up with media mogul Barry Diller’s IAC to launch a new glossy mag-style website called The Daily Beast (New York Times)

(Photo: Reuters)

July 24th, 2008

And now for an afternoon snack….

Posted by: Michele Gershberg

prisoner.jpgThere’s a little something for everybody in the media industry in Frank N. Magid Associates’ annual study of user/viewer/reader behavior. We got a look at some of the findings and took especial note of stats on online video usage, research sponsored by video sharing site Metacafe.

Boiled down, YouTube is still king of online video watching, according to nearly 2,000 web users aged 12 to 64 surveyed by Magid Associates. But as online video becomes a part of our daily routine, corroding wholesome activities like watching TV and going to the movies, there should be plenty more room for sites like rival Metacafe or slick Hulu.

Here’s some of the data on the overarching trends. Magid managing director Mike Vorhaus attributes them to a growing appetite for “snack-sized content.” Now try to make some money off it:

* Half of those surveyed watch some type of online video weekly, more than 10 percent watch it daily.

* More male users aged 12 to 24 say they expect to watch online video more often in the next year.

* Comedy and music videos are the most commonly viewed web video content. News stories rank fourth, full-length movies come in 10th.

* More than 40 percent of online video viewers say they’d rather watch video content on their nice TV sets rather than a PC screen.

* 30 percent believe the Internet is the future of video viewing and 28 percent say they watch less TV because of their web video habits. 44 percent say they consider ads within online video clips as similar to ads in TV shows.

(Photo of prisoners in Manila dancing during an exercise program, an act made famous by a video circulated online. Reuters)

July 21st, 2008

Online viewing won’t kill TV - CBS

Posted by: Kenneth Li

copbaby.jpgNot hugely surprising, but CBS commissioned a study showing that watching full-length shows online won’t destroy television viewership, and it will attract a younger audience.

The study of 50,000 people, commissioned by the network and conducted by Magid Media Labs, polled viewers who have watched full episodes of CBS shows across the company’s partners in the CBS Audience Network.

The findings:

  • Median age of online viewers: 38
  • 35 percent of online watchers say they are now more likely to watch CBS on TV after finding shows online.
  • About 46 percent say they only or mostly watch online.
  • Half of respondents recalled the brand of an ad they saw during the online show.
  • About 18 percent of those who remembered an ad that they saw during the online show said it played a role in their choosing to buy something. That number rose to 31 percent for consumer packaged goods.

In other words, TV networks have nothing to lose. The cable networks, which rely on affiliate fees from cable operators, on the other hand …

(Photo: Reuters)

May 15th, 2008

Cutting through the clutter at OPA’s Global Forum

Posted by: Astrid Zweynert

The economy might be in trouble but advertisers and publishers at the Online Publisher Association’s Forum for the Future were still upbeat today about the prospects for online advertising.

“The first thing people need to do is to decaffeinate some of those expectations (about the economic outlook),” Rapt CEO Tom Chavez said during a State of Advertising panel discussion at the OPA’s meeting in London.

As more people move online, the market will grow despite economic doldrums. Carline Little, CEO of Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive conceded a “recession is going to hit any advertising-supported media but as people move online, we’ll see increases - but not as big as we saw four or five years ago. ”

eMarketer founder Geoff Ramsey helped cut through the clutter of conflicting statistics about key trends in online advertising, social networking and virtual worlds.

Video advertising is likely to grab the lion’s share of online advertising in the future, he said. Marketers are already starting to shift their budgets to video, which could reach $2.5bn by 2012 in the US alone. Some publishers said increasing video advertising was their number one priority for 2008, although a straw poll around the conference room in London did not show a large number of hands among the audience of around 200.

Combining online video with behavioural targeting is one key strategy, as long as you stay in the real world. Second Life, Ramsay said, is not a “mass-reach vehicle.” Out of its 13 million residents, only 877,000 use the site every month and most corporate locations attract less than 500 visitors a day.

Britain leads the pack when it comes to spending on online advertising - the spend per head is $143.48 compared to $112.17 in the United States, Ramsey pointed out. China, with the world’s biggest Internet population, is at just over $5 for now.

But, advertisers have to work harder to gain their audience’s trust. Trust in the industry has fallen to 17 percent of consumers in 2007 from 25 percent in 2005, behind the legal industry and only slightly ahead of tobacco, according to research from DoubleClick.

When consumers were asked how much they trusted specific types of advertising, mobile ads scored the lowest at 18 percent, followed by banner ads at 26 percent, search at 34 percent, and TV and magazines at 56 percent. But hearing about products through friends and family was most trusted at 78 percent.

One way of exploiting such data is to focus increasingly on advertising on social networks, such as Facebook , where users provide valuable information about themselves for advertisers. But that poses its own challenges. Data from the U.S. showed that 54 percent of social network users said they never click on an ad and 80 percent said they would not add a brand as a friend.

Ramsey pinpointed the trends that are likely to shape the outlook for e-marketers:

  • Google will do with phones what they did to the Web, “no question about it.”
  • As consumers use of mobile devices rise, marketers will need to look for cross-media properties that allow consumers to interact with brands, while on the go.
  • Search is not as big as we might think. How do people think of what to search for? Think brands, not search, stupid.