MuniLand

Are teachers a protected class?

By Cate Long
November 17, 2011

State and local employees have not been as hard hit as the general economy. At 19 million strong, this workforce comprises about 14.6 percent of total U.S. non-farm employment. It looks as if education workers are particularly being shielded from job cuts.

Chris Mauro, Head of U.S. Municipals Strategy at RBC Capital Markets wrote today in a privately circulated research note (emphasis mine):

[O]n a percentage basis, the state general government (non-education) sector has seen the largest decline in employment since December 2007. As of October 2011, it is down almost 6% from its recent peak.

Similarly, local education employment is currently down about 3% from the peak and has now also declined by a greater percentage than in any of the prior three recessions.

State education employment, which has historically been very recession resistant, has been growing at a moderate rate since December 2007 but, here again, the growth rate has been slower than in any of the previous three recessions.

I’m fine with this as long as student performance increases and America turns out high school and college graduates who are ready to meet the 21st century with good reading and comprehension skills. It would be a sad thing, though, to devote increasing amounts of precious tax revenues to school systems and universities that are graduating barely literate students. If America is making a bet on education, it really needs to pay off.

The tax collections that support education workers have bifurcated recently. State revenues have returned to pre-recession levels thanks to strong sales and income tax collections, while local revenues have been lagging due to lackluster property tax collections. Though teacher salaries are mainly funded by local taxes, states do pass through significant revenues to local school districts, and higher education receives big cash flows via state funding and loans that students take out to attend college.

Outside of teachers, local governments employ a lot of firefighters, police officers and health and hospital workers. If education workers remain a protected class, then the layoffs will have to come from these areas. RBC’s Mauro comments on non-education local employment:

The sector that continues to puzzle us is the local government (non-education) sector which, while having reduced employment significantly (4%) since its peak in July 2009, has yet to match the payroll reductions experienced during the double-dip recession of the early 1980s. We find it intriguing that, in the aftermath of the deepest economic downturn since the Great Depression and in the face of significant cuts in state aid and declining property tax bases, local government employment remains, on a percentage basis, higher than it was in the 1980s.

If the economy stays weak and the federal government does no further stimulus, then it’s likely we will see more local job cuts. The question really is, can teachers remain a protected class?

Comments
3 comments so far | RSS Comments RSS

Here is Oregon, the state has cut much of the funding to charter schools- they say it’s the Feds and they may be right! Also, our avg teacher up here gets $80k/yr for 9 months work and a 50% graduation rate! I know there’s many excellent teachers, BUT we aren’t getting the value for the buck-that’s got to change in a hurry! Charter schools are getting the results and they want them shut down-typical gov!

Posted by DrJJJJ | Report as abusive
 

I have many relatives in education, though I work on Wall Street. I can tell you that no trader, financial guru or hedge fund manager has any idea of the demands that the majority of teachers are facing day to day.

Most teachers start their day at 7 AM and finish around 5 PM. Then there is work at home to prepare lessons, grade tests, etc. Then there are parents nights and admin meetings that often stretch into the evenings. On top of this, all the school systems are firing teachers, cutting out programs, increasing class size yet the press continues to rant about getting higher test scores.

This editorial fails to mention the percentage of state budgets and federal budgets that go to elected officials, their staff. Plus on the federal level the HUGE percentage of tax money that goes to the military industrial complex that does squat for this country (I am not talking about our armed forces but the private contractors and defense industries).

If the USA wants to remain a technology and economic leader it must invest in its education system. Yet this article implies that states and local governments need to be firing more teachers than administrators and technocrats. Upsurd

Posted by Acetracy | Report as abusive
 

Teachers should not avoid the layoffs, especially if they do not achieve better results.

@Acetracy, I also have many relatives in education, my husband is in tech (at a university). He does work very long hours, both at work, and at home, for his job (salaried). He also is required to do his job with a much more then 50% success rate. In fact, in most other jobs, the employee would be gone with the failure rate of schools

Posted by naryso | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
  • # Editors & Key Contributors