MuniLand

Will Puerto Rico’s governor part ways with Grover Norquist?

By Cate Long
May 11, 2012

Last month, Puerto Rico Governor Luis Fortuño delivered a speech at the libertarian Reason Foundation on “how Puerto Rico avoided becoming “America’s Greece.” In his talk, the governor espoused the anti-government ethos of Grover Norquist, whom he cited as a friend in the first minute of his remarks. Fortuño has been a staunch advocate of “right-sizing” government: Soon after taking office, he laid off a substantial number of the commonwealth’s employees and reduced the island’s personal, corporate and property taxes.

Despite these cuts, Puerto Rico’s budget is still unbalanced. Fortuño has been relying on bond issuance through COFINA, the government’s off-balance-sheet, special-purpose vehicle, to make up for annual shortfalls to his budget.

Now, Republicans in Congress are working to blow another hole in Fortuño’s budget. As part of their effort to stave off the impending, automatic cuts to the defense budget, House Republicans passed legislation that kills a special provision of the Affordable Care Act increasing Medicaid grants to Puerto Rico. Faced with the threat of losing billions of dollars in federal payments each year, Fortuño now seems to think that lower federal spending is not that appealing. He pushed back on these cuts in an op-ed on CNN.com:

Historically, Puerto Rico’s Medicaid program has been chronically underfunded by the federal government. In 2010, Puerto Rico and the other territories secured corrective legislation to provide $6.3 billion in Medicaid funding over 10 years, which includes $5.4 billion for Puerto Rico.

[...]

Now, House Republicans have assembled a package of budget cuts to replace the automatic, across-the-board sequester. The proposal does not cut the Medicaid expansion funds for the 50 states, but Puerto Rico’s $5.4 billion Medicaid provision has been singled out for elimination.

It’s important to note that residents of Puerto Rico are already treated differently in the federal government’s eyes, at least when it comes to the tax code. Its residents do not pay federal income tax on money earned within Puerto Rico, making federal tax collections there much smaller than in any U.S. state. The most recent data available showed federal per capita collections of $888; West Virginia, the state with the second-lowest federal per capita collections, took in $3,599. According to the AARP, Puerto Rico has a higher percentage of residents receiving Social Security than the national average, and only half of those recipients are retirees.

When the food stamp program was modified in 1977 to cover Puerto Rico, 56 percent of the island’s residents signed up to receive those benefits. Although Puerto Rico represents barely more than 1 percent of the national population, Puerto Ricans accounts for about 8 percent of federal dollars spent through the food stamp program. After Congress later modified the program, the percentage of Puerto Rico’s population on food stamps fell, to about 25 percent today, but that’s still well over the national usage rate of 15 percent.

From these figures, it’s clear that Puerto Rico is a very poor place and needs support from the mainland. Given the fragility of the island’s economy, its massive debt load and its need for support from the rest of the nation, Fortuño might do well to break with Grover Norquist and his anti-government message. It’s the taxes he rails against that are helping his people.

Comments
One comment so far | RSS Comments RSS

I believe First of All things should be put in perspective before making statements such as “Puerto Rico is a very poor place and needs support from the mainland.” & “Given the fragility of the island’s economy”…

Perhaps the actual Times Magazine’s Cover story said it best…”Are You Mom Enough?”
Now, doesn’t the analogy makes you want to take the breast out of the 114th year old child’s mouth. (the boy pants was very clever btw)

We must ask ourselves what are we missing here?…because what I just read sounds almost verbatim from Murat Halstead late 19 century books. -The infamous definition of the word Insanity comes to mind.

Now going back to the ‘Breast Feeding Time’ analogy I was asking myself this question earlier today…

Could a Mom still have milk in her breast to feed a child so late into their lives? 

Well, here is a video that might help put things in perspective by a layman in Economics…Sir Tony Robbins. So you don’t just settle for my breast feeding analogy and question.

Enjoy It

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jboTeS9Ok ak&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Posted by Capt.America | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
  • # Editors & Key Contributors