Time for gun control in America
Another mass killing in America. Another wave of grief and questioning. After the killing of 20 children and at least 6 adults in Newton, Connecticut, itâs time as a nation that we tighten the control of gun ownership. Australia changed its laws after facing a similar tragedy. After the Aurora, Colorado mass shooting in July that killed 12 people and injured 58 others, I wrote about how Australia approached gun control. It is worth revisiting and engaging the debate:
July 24, 2012 – After the tragic murders in Aurora, Colorado last Friday, the debate over gun control in the U.S. has been reignited. Policymakers would do well to study the case of AustraliaâsÂ gun-control laws, which were put in place following aÂ comparably tragic incidentÂ in 1996.Â After a man killed 35 people and wounded an additional 21 with two semi-automatic rifles in the Tasmanian town of Port Arthur, AustraliaÂ passed aÂ lawÂ that banned all such rifles, along with semi-automatic and pump-action shotguns, and then created a restrictive system of licensing and ownership controls.
The national government also undertook aÂ gun buyback program. This involved each state and territoryÂ establishing and operating a system through which gunÂ owners and dealers could surrender the newly prohibitedÂ weapons in return for compensation. ArrangementsÂ were also made to compensate firearms dealers forÂ loss of business related to these newly prohibited firearms.
Interestingly, the Australian government only set the policy parameters for the program and left it to each state and territory to establish how to enact it. Because of the variance in the territoriesâ methods, thereâs an interesting data set researchers were able to use toÂ analyze the effectiveness of the program:
In the seven years before the NFA [National Firearms Agreement], the average annual firearm homicide rate per 100,000 was .43 (range .27 to .60) while for the seven years post NFA, the average annual firearm homicide rate was .25 (range .16 to .33).
Additional evidence strongly suggests that the buyback causally reduced firearm deaths. First, the drop in firearm deaths was largest among the type of firearms most affected by the buyback. Second, firearm deaths in states with higher buyback rates per capita fell proportionately more than in states with lower buyback rates.
Among G20 nations, the U.S. owns theÂ highest firearm-related death rate. Following this latest mass killing, itâs a good time to look at other nations and their laws. The passive stance of Congress and our political leaders does not serve the people.