Comments on: The Benghazi booby trap http://blogs.reuters.com/nicholas-wapshott/2012/10/30/the-benghazi-booby-trap/ Wed, 26 Nov 2014 19:47:54 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: Leftcoastrocky http://blogs.reuters.com/nicholas-wapshott/2012/10/30/the-benghazi-booby-trap/#comment-62 Fri, 02 Nov 2012 19:30:07 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/nicholas-wapshott/?p=43#comment-62 Langley, Pentagon Could Not Have Helped in Benghazi, Expert Says
Attack did not last long enough for Washington to send help. http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2012  /11/02/langley-pentagon-could-not-have- helped-in-benghazi-expert-says

]]>
By: ichibon13 http://blogs.reuters.com/nicholas-wapshott/2012/10/30/the-benghazi-booby-trap/#comment-43 Thu, 01 Nov 2012 04:51:54 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/nicholas-wapshott/?p=43#comment-43 Your article is pithy with information; however, lacking in reputable substance, unless you consider the conjecture about an event you evidently know nothing about.

]]>
By: Bulldogz http://blogs.reuters.com/nicholas-wapshott/2012/10/30/the-benghazi-booby-trap/#comment-40 Wed, 31 Oct 2012 13:53:29 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/nicholas-wapshott/?p=43#comment-40 The families should not have to hear this bickering! Whatever happened, just get to the truth andlet chips fall where they may! John McCain just seems petty to me now! I don’t care how rich he is!

]]>
By: JP007 http://blogs.reuters.com/nicholas-wapshott/2012/10/30/the-benghazi-booby-trap/#comment-37 Wed, 31 Oct 2012 06:16:24 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/nicholas-wapshott/?p=43#comment-37 Stated premise of article at Bloomberg site: “Why has such a virulent campaign to discredit Obama’s record as commander-in-chief so conspicuously failed?”

Short for Answer: Because dead men tell no tales.

Recommendation for Author: Try being a real journalist rather than a propagandist.

]]>
By: Crash866 http://blogs.reuters.com/nicholas-wapshott/2012/10/30/the-benghazi-booby-trap/#comment-35 Tue, 30 Oct 2012 18:35:38 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/nicholas-wapshott/?p=43#comment-35 Just as there is a “Murdoch discount” for News Corp. shares, on account of Murdoch’s buccaneer approach to business morality, so there is a “Murdoch discount” attached to Fox News reports. Its “Fair and Balanced” motto has long been an LOL line among journalists worldwide, but in the case of the Benghazi attacks, Fox News’s reputation for misconstruing facts and waging poisonous ad hominem smears has counted against what began as a legitimate journalistic impulse — to discover why administration statements were so clearly at odds with what took place. What is more, Fox failed to uncover anything startling to persuade other news organizations to follow their lead.

WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

]]>
By: Crash866 http://blogs.reuters.com/nicholas-wapshott/2012/10/30/the-benghazi-booby-trap/#comment-34 Tue, 30 Oct 2012 16:27:07 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/nicholas-wapshott/?p=43#comment-34 It’s great when you can claim this is a booby trap for the GOP. Amazing!!!

]]>
By: Crash866 http://blogs.reuters.com/nicholas-wapshott/2012/10/30/the-benghazi-booby-trap/#comment-33 Tue, 30 Oct 2012 16:26:00 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/nicholas-wapshott/?p=43#comment-33 No wonder with articles like this…let’s not worry about the fatcs of what happened and how it was handled let’s demonize, Fox, McCain & Romney. Does that answer your question?

]]>
By: Crash866 http://blogs.reuters.com/nicholas-wapshott/2012/10/30/the-benghazi-booby-trap/#comment-32 Tue, 30 Oct 2012 16:22:53 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/nicholas-wapshott/?p=43#comment-32 How about no media coverage? it’s obvious what happened but the MMS is avoiding this like the the plague.

]]>