Can Republicans tell the truth to themselves?

By Nicholas Wapshott
January 29, 2013

To understand how far the republic founded by the famously truthful George Washington has become a mendacious nation, you need look only as far as the Weather Channel. According to a report, the meteorologists there deliberately and routinely tell untruths about the prospect of rain so that when it turns out to be sunny the network’s viewers feel unexpectedly happy. The practice, it seems, is widespread among weather forecasters. Joe Sobel, a meteorologist for Accuweather, tells his audience it will rain when he knows the likelihood is small because “when the forecast is for good weather and it’s bad, I certainly will get more grief than if the forecast is for bad weather and it’s good.”

When the accuracy of even weather forecasting, a once factual, rigorous, scientifically determined service relied upon by everyone from farmers to sailors, is compromised for fear of causing offense, America has reached a state of quotidian deceit even George Orwell did not reckon on. Lying over the weather is not the compulsive lying of Richard Nixon: “People have got to know whether or not their President is a crook. Well, I’m not a crook.” Or the visceral lying of Lance Armstrong, who even lied when he confessed to Oprah Winfrey, using the lying words, “I can’t lie to you …” and “I’m not going to lie to you or to the public …” Nor is it even the crooked lies of the price-fixing bankers who misled the markets and cost us all a pretty penny when they concocted the Libor lending rate to suit themselves.

Lying about the weather to please the masses is not so much lying as pandering on a prodigious scale. Bowing down before the voters has become so commonplace in Washington that when someone says something from the heart that is likely to provoke contemplation or discussion, they are dismissed as foolhardy. The president’s second inaugural address was full of soaring language and high ideals that reflected his ambitions for the nation. But Barack Obama was so liberal in his vision that the speech was derided by opponents as un-presidentially divisive and absurdly idealistic. The same charge was made against Ronald Reagan’s first inaugural address from the Democratic side. How dare the president say what he believes and where he is heading? Tell us what we like to hear, or at the least say something that will not offer hostages to fortune. Please pander more and stop talking like a leader.

Democratic leaders have no need to pander. Their next presidential candidates are already lining up, and it would be foolhardy indeed to dare tell Hillary Clinton or Joe Biden what to say or do. They are so obviously leaders with their own thoughts and agendas that the Democratic base is ready to follow them wherever they lead. That may be bad for party democracy, but it is good for winning elections. The Republican leadership, meanwhile, is so buffeted and bossed around by its Tea Party base that it conjures up images of high-rise ladder fire engines that have a driver at the front and another at the rear to steer round tight corners. The hilarious 2012 GOP primary season was a panderers’ parade, with every last candidate so eager to get on the right side of the far right they ended up, like poor Mitt Romney, as tangled as a fairground contortionist.

At a Republican National Committee election inquest in Williamsburg, Virginia, last week, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal risked his future as a 2016 presidential candidate by engaging in some straight talking. “We’ve got to stop being the Stupid Party. It’s time for a new Republican Party that talks like adults,” he said. ”We had a number of Republicans damage the brand this year with offensive and bizarre comments. I’m here to say we’ve had enough of that.” And: “A debate about which party can better manage the federal government is a very small and shortsighted debate. If our vision is not bigger than that, we do not deserve to win.” He declared that “the Republican Party does not need to change our principles ‑ but we might need to change just about everything else we do.” That’s not a message the Republican base wants to hear, but it sure sounds like leadership.

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, too, has decided it is time to abandon pandering and offer an election-winning alternative. He thinks the endless talking points about Benghazi, abortion, gay marriage and taxes plainly did not resonate with voters and will soon advocate policies designed to broaden the GOP’s appeal beyond the base to embrace moderate Republicans who have been turned off by the hoary mantras of the “closed system” dogmatists content merely to talk to each other.

Speaking to an audience of the world’s political and business elite at Davos, well out of Tea Party earshot, Cantor described the 2012 election as “a wake-up call for a lot of folks” and spoke of introducing “sane immigration policies,” adopting German economic growth strategies and helping the unemployed find jobs. He will propose specific policies at the American Enterprise Institute on Feb. 5 that include private-school vouchers for poor parents, new workforce training programs and easy-to-obtain visas to lure high-tech immigrants – subjects [r3] that brand him as a dangerous appeaser among many of his party’s faithful.

These are early days in the Republican postmortem. Some appear ready to face the facts of defeat and avoid the head-on confrontation urged by their allies in what some conservatives describe as “the media-industrial complex” that earns its keep by urging on GOP extremists. Charles Krauthammer, a keeper of the complex, knows which side his bread is buttered and advises more of the same. “Ignore the trimmers,” he declared within hours of the November defeat. “There’s no need for radical change. … No whimpering. No whining. No reinvention when none is needed. Do conservatism but do it better. There’s a whole generation of leaders ready to do just that.” It is a sure recipe for permanent Democratic government.

Footnote: The story of George Washington, on being accused of chopping down a cherry tree, saying, “I can’t tell a lie, Pa. You know I can’t tell a lie. I did cut it with my hatchet,” was itself a lie, made up by an early biographer, Mason Locke Weems.

Nicholas Wapshott’s Keynes Hayek: The Clash That Defined Modern Economics is published by W.W. Norton. Read extracts here.

PHOTO: Lightning strikes over a pier during a storm in Atlit, near the northern Israeli city of Haifa October 25, 2012. REUTERS/Baz Ratner

9 comments

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/

Jihdahl said, ”We had a number of Republicans damage the brand this year…”

I have a problem with the word “brand”. That’s part of the problem. Rather than have “a brand” how about we have a legitimate message based in common sense?

The Tea Party wanted to hear the far-right extremist rhetoric, and they got it, and they whipped up, as AlkalineState put so accurately, the “camo” crowd. The public wanted this Republican “brand” and if they had won, we’d be neck deep in it. So backpedaling at this point is nothing more than desperation.

“Ooops” won’t cut it now. Where was the backbone of the Republican party to stand up for common sense when Cain was literally and figuratively blowing smoke at the voters? Oh, of course, they were all sitting back silent, hoping it would get them all elected.

Spineless, pandering wimps then, spineless, pandering wimps now.

Posted by JL4 | Report as abusive

“Lying about the weather to please the masses is not so much lying as pandering on a prodigious scale. Democratic leaders have no need to pander.” Really?

Mr. Wapshott, you must be delusional. Politics is always about pandering. The President during the entire campaign pandered to each unique segment of his supposed constituency–women, Latinos, unions, ad infinitum–part of his “if you don’t have a platform to run on, demonize the opposition”. Unfortunately, it works–but that doesn’t place the President or the Democratic party beyond reproach.

Pandering is part of the Beltway culture–and serves to only maintain the status quo for the political aristocracy–all those career politicians whose only objective in life is to be reelected–so they can continue to suck the life out of this country.

That’s why McConnell and Biden could cut a backroom deal on the fiscal cliff. They pander to one another, and the American worker takes the beating. And the self-proclaimed “protector of the middle class” sat on the sidelines and signed the bill.

It exists mainly because the press/media, who demand their privileged protection under the lst Amendment are reluctant to attack any Democrat who panders, lies and misrepresents. But under that same lst Amendment, the press/media is corrupted and overtly abdicating their responsibility to the people of this country.

The fact that you would even consider writing this article serves to verify that you’re drinking the same Kool-Aid.

Posted by COindependent | Report as abusive

“We, the people” no longer have a party representing the majority of us.

Most of us have guns and intend to keep them, legally or illegally. Most of us support Roe vs. Wade. Most LEGAL citizens don’t want another 11 million wetbacks legalized. All the1986 amnesty bought us was 11 million more fence jumpers with hands out demanding “rights” they don’t have and don’t deserve that have no intention of “assimilating”.

A majority don’t want all the alphabet soup government agencies of unlimited power accountable to no one that each today keep growing and will NEVER “sunset”. We are tired of politicians that are able to stay in Washington forever just by keeping us at each other’s throats on piddling issues.

We want a government and courts again restricted in the manner our founding fathers intended. Only when government is truly restricted in what it can and should do can it’s otherwise insatiable thirst for the crack cocaine of politics, tax revenue or printing press monopoly money be limited.

But there are far too many interests that have grown fat and lazy under the present fiscal chaos for any single source to “tame the tiger” that will consume us all.

Posted by OneOfTheSheep | Report as abusive

Still the party of greed and hate, and always will be. Sure the Dems are weak and stupid, but a choice must be made. Let’s see, greed and hate, or weak and stupid, greed and hate or weak and stupid. Hmmm, it’s crappy choice, but the one we get.

Posted by brotherkenny4 | Report as abusive

Obama’s speech is arrogantly statist . And then he backs the criminally stupid fraud that the molecule which is the building block of the biosphere will kill us all unless they take more of our money , ie : decisions , from US .

Posted by BobArmstrong | Report as abusive

The purpose of a political party is to get people elected and steer the currents of power and control to itself. In a democracy this done by appealing to the interests of voters (social and moral values may be a major interest, but only one). Segmentation is the name of the game, and Democrats have concluded that white women 30-54 is the pinion. 08 and 12 says they’re right. The next generation of leaders want to get elected, and if the GOP doesn’t figure it out how, they will go hunting where the ducks are. Simple as that.

Posted by Bagehot | Report as abusive

“We the people”, i am so tired of that phrase, it’s a sorry excuse to just complain about the fact that your party lost. The majority is not tired of big government, they elected Obama, so how can anyone say that 51% is not a majority? The people using this phrase are the ones who are delusional. And i agree with the comment about the brand, that is precisely the problem. The republican party is not Korn Flakes, it is not a brand. To label it such is to keep the same old party with a new face but same old content, and no amount of lipstick is going to change that little piggy.

Posted by ofilha | Report as abusive

Until the Republican Party Quits with the Moral Laws ( Their Morals) and actually does something to Help bring Good Jobs to the Nation and Stops with The Job Creator rhetoric I dont see much hope for them PS low payed jobs needing welfare to get by do not count as good paying jobs

Posted by DOOM2U | Report as abusive

Excellent, “OneOfTheSheep” mixes racism in with his limited government message, and “BobArmstrong” mixes ignorance of basic high-school science and climate change denial in with his own limited government message. Ironic, considering the subject of the article.

Posted by Pacra | Report as abusive