Opinion

Nicholas Wapshott

The healthy route for Hillary Clinton: Release your medical records

By Nicholas Wapshott
May 20, 2014

hillary!!

So Karl Rove has cast doubt on former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s health. He may have been off when he claimed that the presumed 2016 Democratic presidential candidate spent 30 days in the hospital — she was only kept in for three — but he has clearly drawn political blood.

The Clintons went into full defense mode. Though every presidential candidate in modern times has provided a full account of their health, and if Hillary Clinton decides to run, she too will have to hand over her full medical file — including an explanation of the blood clot between her skull and her brain caused by a fall, a full account of why she fell, what treatment she received, how well she recovered and whether there are any lasting effects. It’s par for the course.

The Clintons being Clintons, however, are keeping mum about the substance of Rove’s accusation. As if it were somehow bad manners to raise health as an issue. Health is, should and will be an issue, just as the health of whoever emerges as the champion from the GOP presidential primaries will be pounced on, prodded and pored over.

Republican political consultant Rove speaks with the National Journal's Brownstein during the fifth annual Washington Ideas Forum at the Newseum in WashingtonClinton’s age will also be an issue in the 2016 election, just as it was for Ronald Reagan — who was 69 years old when elected, compared to her 68, if she runs — and for Senator Bob Dole — who was 73 years old when he made his last White House bid in 1996.

Clinton’s strength in her party is such that until she makes up her mind whether she will run, no other Democrat can raise a cent to explore a campaign of their own. That is why, a full two and a half years away from November 2016, we are in the midst of a phony election.

There may be a number of good reasons that Rove and his fellow GOP strategists are gunning for Clinton this early. Perhaps they consider her such a strong candidate that they are trying to damage her below the waterline — even before she makes her decision about whether to run. Perhaps they feel her popularity in the country is so high — the latest polls show she would trounce anyone the Republicans can put up against her — it is going to take more than two years of sniping to defeat her.

But how should Clinton respond to questions about her health and other pertinent — and impertinent — topics? In this last month alone, she has been accused, when secretary of state, of not designating Boko Haram, the wicked kidnappers of 270 Nigerian girls, a terrorist group fast enough. She also had to dodge the fallout from the reentry into public view of her husband’s Oval Office squeeze, Monica Lewinsky, who reheated the sex scandal for Vanity Fair. In response to both of these drive-bys, she has remained above the fray, leaving surrogates, including her husband, to make her case.

Among the other issues Hillary Clinton must eventually face are decisions she made when first lady. She will be quizzed about her failed universal health care initiative, which has new relevance now that we have Obamacare; her involvement with the Whitewater real estate development; her part in the White House travel office firings; and her friendship with Vince Foster, the White House counsel who committed suicide in odd circumstances.

Above all, she will be scrutinized over her behavior during the Lewinsky affair. Should she have stood by her man, or should she have thrown President Bill Clinton out?

Then there is her time as secretary of state. Did she really do everything she should have done and could have done to minimize the danger to U.S. Ambassador Chris Stephens and the three other Americans who died during a terrorist assault on a U.S. mission in Benghazi?

Republicans think they are onto a winner with Benghazi, and the polls agree, which is why, despite the lack of anything really new, they are pressing ahead with another congressional inquiry. Prepare to be bored — because it is going to be all Benghazi, all the time.

Rove may be onto something. It is not just the baggage Clinton carries around with her; it is the Clintons’ apparent gift for stonewalling that gives the impression they are hiding something.

This may be miserably unfair. There may well be nothing to hide. But the public perception is that the Clintons tend to get into the bunker and batten down the hatches whenever they are under scrutiny. Even when they are innocent.

bill & hillaryThat plays into a further problem with Clinton’s presidential run. There is a general sense that the Clintons make life more difficult for themselves because they are so brilliant at handling the messy side of politics.

When Vice President Joe Biden’s son Hunter was reported to be linked in a business deal to the ousted pro-Russian Ukrainian president, an old journalistic hand said to me, “It’s the Clintons.” Asked what he meant, he said, “The Clintons leaked it. It is just like them.”

I don’t believe for a minute the Clintons did any such thing. But the fact that it was plausible, that it was the sort of thing the Clintons do, is bad for them.

The thought of returning to a time when the Clintons lived in the White House, with all that that entails in terms of washing dirty linen in public, is troubling even to many Democrats.

We have not only seen this movie, we have lived through it. And believe me, it is not worth seeing twice.

So what is Clinton to do? In brief, she should come clean, starting with the blood clot. Issue the full medical records right now. Does that inhibit her from deciding whether to run for the presidency? Not at all. If she has a clean bill of health, it will show Rove as being a little too eager to find a dirty little secret. If her health remains an issue, she needs to get it out sooner rather than later.

If there are questions about what is kept under lock and key in the Clinton Library, release everything right now. If there are questions about how much she and her husband have earned over the years, open the books.

Don’t wait for a week or a month or call in the lawyers: publish and be damned.

If the latest Benghazi investigating committee asks her to appear before them, she should jump at the chance. As she showed during the Senate hearing when Senators Rand Paul (R-Ky.), Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) and other amateurs took potshots at her, she is more than capable of looking after herself.

Benghazi? Bring it on.

Nicholas Wapshott is the author of Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher: A Political Marriage, and Keynes Hayek: The Clash That Defined Modern Economics. Read extracts here.

 

PHOTO (TOP): Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton speaks to members of the Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries during their annual convention in Las Vegas, Nevada, April 10, 2014. REUTERS/Las Vegas Sun/Steve Marcus

PHOTO (INSERT 1): Republican political consultant Karl Rove during the fifth annual Washington Ideas Forum at the Newseum in Washington, November 14, 2013. REUTERS/Gary Cameron

PHOTO (INSERT 2): Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (L) and her husband, former President Bill Clinton talk at a dinner in honor of Presidential Medal of Freedom awardees at the Smithsonian National Museum of American History in Washington, November 20, 2013. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

Comments
26 comments so far | RSS Comments RSS

I don’t see a compelling case to “come clean.” Let the GOP clown show begin.

Posted by PCScipio | Report as abusive
 

I don’t see a compelling case to “come clean.” Let the GOP clown show begin.

Posted by PCScipio | Report as abusive
 

I don’t see a compelling case to “come clean.” Let the GOP clown show begin.

Posted by PCScipio | Report as abusive
 

I don’t see a compelling case to “come clean.” Let the GOP clown show begin.

Posted by PCScipio | Report as abusive
 

I don’t see a compelling case to “come clean.” Let the GOP clown show begin.

Posted by PCScipio | Report as abusive
 

She should not run in 2016. She may have a lot of good ideas and plans for policies but she is such a polarizing figure that she would be hampered and a lame duck President from the start, Republicans would never compromise or make any back room deals that are at the heart of how a President and congress get things done. She just has too much baggage and Bill Clinton would possibly end up being a co-president behind the scenes, he had his 2 terms.

At this point I can’t think of anyone from either party that stands out as a good choice, there is talk of Jeb Bush but we have had enough of Bush and Clintons in the Whitehouse.

Democrats need less Clinton.
Republicians need less Tea party and more Eisenhower

Posted by mrnukem | Report as abusive
 

That is bs…Bill already said that she is very healthy and even better than him.
The Clintons don’t let the GOP set the playbook, it is only the cowardly DNC.

Posted by YRaj | Report as abusive
 

That is bs…Bill already said that she is very healthy and even better than him.
The Clintons don’t let the GOP set the playbook, it is only the cowardly DNC.

Posted by YRaj | Report as abusive
 

That is ridiculous..Bill already said that she is very healthy and even better than him.
The Clintons don’t let the GOP set the playbook, it is only the cowardly DNC.

Posted by YRaj | Report as abusive
 

The blood clot explains all…

Posted by Macedonian | Report as abusive
 

It would be a very risky move to enlist Hillary Clinton for Prez in 2016 for a number of reasons. I really doubt that she would make it to the White House without ballot stuffing or arm twisting from Bill et al. To name a few, blood clot that required 30 days hospitalization plus now we know 6 months of rehab. Her age, which would most likely keep her presidency to 4 years. Her poor performance as Sec of State is certainly not a recommendation, not to mention her questionable truth telling on Benghazi et al. The coup de grace would be that we would have to put up with Bill Clinton and all his posing and inserting himself into her presidency.

Posted by Lilydaisy | Report as abusive
 

Apart from the possible brain damage issue, one important consideration is, yes, Mrs. Clinton’s age. Given she will be 69 if she takes office in 2017, her age is certainly something to think about. I say this as someone who is retiring next month at 61. I feel tired and worn after 38 consecutive years of full-time work. How could Ms. Clinton be up to the rigors of a job like U.S. president at such a relatively advanced age? What if her party decides to reelect her, so that she starts her second term at 73? Isn’t the presidency really a job for someone who is younger, more vigorous, and energetic?

Posted by ExDemocrat | Report as abusive
 

There are many reasons for not nominating Hillary Clinton for Prez in 2016. Certainly her blood clot episode should be looked into, particularly since she spent a month in the hospital and 6 months recovering, etc. etc. Then there is her poor performance and decision making skills while Sec of State. Then there is her questionable credibility regarding her truth telling. Worst of all is the fact that Bill Clinton would be once again in the White House.

Posted by Lilydaisy | Report as abusive
 

One important consideration is, yes, Mrs. Clinton’s age. Given she will be 69 if she takes office in 2017, her age is certainly something to think about. I say this as someone who is retiring next month at 61. I feel tired and worn after 38 consecutive years of full-time work. How could Ms. Clinton be up to the rigors of a job like U.S. president at such a relatively advanced age? What if her party decides to reelect her, so that she starts her second term at 73? Isn’t the presidency really a job for someone who is younger, more vigorous, and energetic?

Posted by ExDemocrat | Report as abusive
 

Sage advice but rarely ever followed – still and all there is an awful lot of smoke as even Bubba Clinton let slip “it took six months” to recover.. not just 3 days in the hospital..

Posted by Bludde | Report as abusive
 

Republicans cacking themselves over Hillary, awesome, and who can they run with, probably Mitt Romney again, hilarious. Good luck with the smear campaign you’re going to need it.

Posted by thinker72 | Report as abusive
 

The GOP has nothing left except right wing problems of their own making. So they will do whatever it takes to create whatever diversions they can. Very sad.

Posted by ArghONaught | Report as abusive
 

Clinton, like O and the Bushes, is a fascist warmonger. Her State Department brought the U.S. taxpayers the unprovoked NATO war on Libya and the U.S. State Department / CIA unprovoked war on Syria. Both war crimes cost U.S. taxpayers billions of dollars to murder and displace millions of Muslims and Christians.

Call her “War-Hag” Clinton as opposed to Deregulate-Into-Financial-Disaster” Clinton.

Posted by XWM | Report as abusive
 

Republicans cacking themselves over Hillary, awesome, and who can they run with, probably Mitt Romney again, hilarious. Good luck with the smear campaign you’re going to need it.

Posted by thinker72 | Report as abusive
 

Congratulations on “grandma” photo choice, must have taken longer than writing the article.
The later Hillary Clinton will announce her candidacy, the better for the Democratic Party and less chances for any Republican candidate. They will have to shoot to themselves instead of Clinton.
She will probably say Yes not earlier then spring-summer of 2015, the best timing would be a month before… Democratic primaries. Just for show contenders from Democratic Party. The most competent US President since at least… her husband, and a woman, and the wife of Bill Clinton. She cannot loose.

Posted by Wantunbiasednew | Report as abusive
 

The best thing that H. Clinton is to not run for office. She obviously does not have the capabilities needed to lead the country. Just imagine B. J. Clinton back in the Whitehouse!

Posted by Bighammerman | Report as abusive
 

How can she come clean when she is so dirty!

Posted by Bighammerman | Report as abusive
 

Age is a relevant issue for Mrs. Clinton. The average age for retirement in the U.S. is 61. Many people by then are worn down and tired from working. If Mrs. Clinton wins, she will be 69 when she starts in 2017, and 73 if she is able to begin a second term. Surely the U.S. presidency is better suited for someone who is younger, more vigorous, and energetic.

Posted by ExDemocrat | Report as abusive
 

The article confuses Karl Rove’s Swiftboating tactics to legitimate concerns…

There is NO response that Clinton could possibly make that will silence these accusations — because, Obama’s birth certificate, they are simply the new Republican weapon…

There is only one way to silence these claims and that is for the media to stop feeding on it and start treating as it really is: Domestic Terrorism

Posted by GeorgeBMac | Report as abusive
 

The article confuses Karl Rove’s Swiftboating tactics to legitimate concerns…

There is NO response that Clinton could possibly make that will silence these accusations — because, Obama’s birth certificate, they are simply the new Republican weapon…

There is only one way to silence these claims and that is for the media to stop feeding on it and start treating as it really is: Domestic Terrorism

Posted by GeorgeBMac | Report as abusive
 

Hillary will win.. then the gop can switch from being mad at a black president reinvigorating racism to being mad at a female president making the war on women personal…

Posted by michaelryan | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
  •