<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Layuft, layuft, layuft right layuft&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/oddly-enough/2007/09/11/layuft-layuft-layuft-right-layuft/</link>
	<description>News, but not the serious kind</description>
	<pubDate>Fri,  5 Sep 2008 10:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bohatnik</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/oddly-enough/2007/09/11/layuft-layuft-layuft-right-layuft/#comment-325854</link>
		<dc:creator>Bohatnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 20:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/oddly-enough/2007/09/11/layuft-layuft-layuft-right-layuft/#comment-325854</guid>
		<description>Do they have some sort of maternity uniform in the military?  because if not, I'm pretty sure that dress would just about do it.  Oh, and as far as the fascist fashion industry is concerned: spots work as camouflage for leopards, but not models.  Why would we want soldiers who can be 'spotted' a mile away?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do they have some sort of maternity uniform in the military?  because if not, I&#8217;m pretty sure that dress would just about do it.  Oh, and as far as the fascist fashion industry is concerned: spots work as camouflage for leopards, but not models.  Why would we want soldiers who can be &#8217;spotted&#8217; a mile away?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlene</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/oddly-enough/2007/09/11/layuft-layuft-layuft-right-layuft/#comment-312893</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 14:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/oddly-enough/2007/09/11/layuft-layuft-layuft-right-layuft/#comment-312893</guid>
		<description>You know, designers usually style the models to look like Garbo or Monroe or Crawford, not Colonel Flagg from M*A*S*H.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, designers usually style the models to look like Garbo or Monroe or Crawford, not Colonel Flagg from M*A*S*H.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K F</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/oddly-enough/2007/09/11/layuft-layuft-layuft-right-layuft/#comment-306184</link>
		<dc:creator>K F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/oddly-enough/2007/09/11/layuft-layuft-layuft-right-layuft/#comment-306184</guid>
		<description>Shawn we all know the answer to that. Its clearly going to be the anti christ. Or else the world will spontaneously discontinue to be. Either/or. And was the crooked really necessary? ^^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shawn we all know the answer to that. Its clearly going to be the anti christ. Or else the world will spontaneously discontinue to be. Either/or. And was the crooked really necessary? ^^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Hendricks</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/oddly-enough/2007/09/11/layuft-layuft-layuft-right-layuft/#comment-304565</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Hendricks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 19:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/oddly-enough/2007/09/11/layuft-layuft-layuft-right-layuft/#comment-304565</guid>
		<description>What do you get when you cross a crooked politician with a dirty lawyer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you get when you cross a crooked politician with a dirty lawyer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Hendricks</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/oddly-enough/2007/09/11/layuft-layuft-layuft-right-layuft/#comment-304563</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Hendricks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 19:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/oddly-enough/2007/09/11/layuft-layuft-layuft-right-layuft/#comment-304563</guid>
		<description>A color scheme should require, one would imagine, some scheming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A color scheme should require, one would imagine, some scheming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/oddly-enough/2007/09/11/layuft-layuft-layuft-right-layuft/#comment-304446</link>
		<dc:creator>K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/oddly-enough/2007/09/11/layuft-layuft-layuft-right-layuft/#comment-304446</guid>
		<description>...while the new uniforms allow for more freedom of movement, there's nothing more embarrassing than getting your rifle caught in the hem of your dress while standing face to face with the enemy. 

By the way...the shoes just don't go with that dress...wait...are those curtains?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;while the new uniforms allow for more freedom of movement, there&#8217;s nothing more embarrassing than getting your rifle caught in the hem of your dress while standing face to face with the enemy. </p>
<p>By the way&#8230;the shoes just don&#8217;t go with that dress&#8230;wait&#8230;are those curtains?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lady Weasel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/oddly-enough/2007/09/11/layuft-layuft-layuft-right-layuft/#comment-304445</link>
		<dc:creator>Lady Weasel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/oddly-enough/2007/09/11/layuft-layuft-layuft-right-layuft/#comment-304445</guid>
		<description>Girl Scouts that don't sell cookies anymore.  Heck, they won't even look at the cookies!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Girl Scouts that don&#8217;t sell cookies anymore.  Heck, they won&#8217;t even look at the cookies!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
