<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dress recaptures movie magic?</title>
	<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/oddly-enough/2008/05/04/dress-recaptures-movie-magic/</link>
	<description>News, but not the serious kind</description>
	<pubDate>Wed,  9 Jul 2008 09:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jet Set Charly</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/oddly-enough/2008/05/04/dress-recaptures-movie-magic/#comment-355851</link>
		<dc:creator>Jet Set Charly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 18:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/oddly-enough/2008/05/04/dress-recaptures-movie-magic/#comment-355851</guid>
		<description>Bravo Reuters, this piece of Marilyn Monroe journalism is not as harmful to history as the Keya Morgan bs that you threw at all of us. The sex tape does not even exist and yet Reuters isn't even publishing a follow-up?
Why?
So this rag is looking like the iconic Monroe dress in your eyes? Mhhhh, just let me think for a bit how anybody can sit down and drive or, oh well if someone wears such a creation, they are possibly carried around like Cleopatra, laying down and being fed some grapes, maybe?
Why not remember the last thing we heard about the 'iconic dress' worn by La Monroe?
William Travilla the 'lost' collection exhibit made it now once, but twice to a public display, and they were ripping off people left and right by showing 100% fake 'costumes' that they claimed were worn by Marilyn Monroe. But they were not. That 'exhibit' of fakes is now also history and it was like going to a gallery, paying $20 admission and looking at seven rip-off copies of Picasso or Dali, or Monet or Rembrandt or even Warhol, yet then later you find out, that these claimed to be 'originals' were really fakes. What would you do, how would you feel?
Maybe like the model who does not really know what to think about this piece of table cloth. She is somehow looking like the moving table people who serve you food, in NYC, just with a shorter version....
Here is a link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvJe8Sas45E</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bravo Reuters, this piece of Marilyn Monroe journalism is not as harmful to history as the Keya Morgan bs that you threw at all of us. The sex tape does not even exist and yet Reuters isn&#8217;t even publishing a follow-up?<br />
Why?<br />
So this rag is looking like the iconic Monroe dress in your eyes? Mhhhh, just let me think for a bit how anybody can sit down and drive or, oh well if someone wears such a creation, they are possibly carried around like Cleopatra, laying down and being fed some grapes, maybe?<br />
Why not remember the last thing we heard about the &#8216;iconic dress&#8217; worn by La Monroe?<br />
William Travilla the &#8216;lost&#8217; collection exhibit made it now once, but twice to a public display, and they were ripping off people left and right by showing 100% fake &#8216;costumes&#8217; that they claimed were worn by Marilyn Monroe. But they were not. That &#8216;exhibit&#8217; of fakes is now also history and it was like going to a gallery, paying $20 admission and looking at seven rip-off copies of Picasso or Dali, or Monet or Rembrandt or even Warhol, yet then later you find out, that these claimed to be &#8216;originals&#8217; were really fakes. What would you do, how would you feel?<br />
Maybe like the model who does not really know what to think about this piece of table cloth. She is somehow looking like the moving table people who serve you food, in NYC, just with a shorter version&#8230;.<br />
Here is a link:<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvJe8Sas45E" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvJe8Sas4 5E</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlene</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/oddly-enough/2008/05/04/dress-recaptures-movie-magic/#comment-355757</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 16:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/oddly-enough/2008/05/04/dress-recaptures-movie-magic/#comment-355757</guid>
		<description>Are you sure this isn't the toilet paper outfit from last week?

Also, I don't know what's worse: the fact that she's wearing pantyhose without shoes, or the fact that she's wearing pantyhose at all. Of all the fashion trends of the past decade, I fully support one - the banishing of pantyhose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you sure this isn&#8217;t the toilet paper outfit from last week?</p>
<p>Also, I don&#8217;t know what&#8217;s worse: the fact that she&#8217;s wearing pantyhose without shoes, or the fact that she&#8217;s wearing pantyhose at all. Of all the fashion trends of the past decade, I fully support one - the banishing of pantyhose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fortunalee</title>
		<link>http://blogs.reuters.com/oddly-enough/2008/05/04/dress-recaptures-movie-magic/#comment-355624</link>
		<dc:creator>Fortunalee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 14:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.reuters.com/oddly-enough/2008/05/04/dress-recaptures-movie-magic/#comment-355624</guid>
		<description>This is the crumb-catcher version, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the crumb-catcher version, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
