Funny, my representative routinely has meetings with constitutents. She manages it. Properly condicted statistics may have a place. They should not be the sole source of information. Isn’t it funny how senators and representatives manage to get out to meet their constituents at campaign time?

PS. I AM something. Whose something are you?

This morning, in response to a question, I said “I have the distinct honor and privilege of not having to make that decision.” Obama does not have that luxury. In addition, he must be exhausted from the campaign, and the defense mechanisms which kept his personal grief at bay during the campaign are now wearing down.

I hope that the American public and the media are kind to him. Pray for him … hard.

Nor would I trust any poll where the poll states that the selected locations were “scientifcally selected.” Notice, the words “unbiased” and “unprejudiced” do not appear. What were the criteria on which the “science” was based? What was the purpose behind the poll? I deal with many, many “experts.” One can prove anything with statistics.

One of the biggest problems with the U.S. Government is that it HEAVILY relies upon statistics. Ultimately, statistics, just like sterotypes, are fictions. They are no substitute for legislators meeting with and discussing issues with their constituents.

And, before you start presuming to know whom I voted for, give it up. You don’t.

“There are three types of prevarications: Lies, damn lies, and statistics.” — Mark Twain

Here are the exit polls - you can see under the education section.