Comments on: The Pakistan conundrum

By: Joyce

Joyce — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 23:26:57 +0000

I think Musharraf is probably the best presidents Pakistan will have. He tried hard to operate in that God forsaken place. I’m not sure if even the Pakis understand the mayhem and mischief that the ISI has created. If M goes, Pak can be sure to descend into a permanent chaos, if it is not already. That country and the saner elements should realize the extreme danger the radical element of islam represents.

By: asad

asad — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:04:00 +0000

what makes india the \’elder\’ brother…? nothing..india has its own agenda and peace with pakistan is not one of them..since 1947…who else are they arming themselves against..the chinese…?

By: geography

geography — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 02:36:43 +0000

Of course Pakistan is neither in the middle east nor is its policy with India responsible for its current situation.

By: barry kumar

barry kumar — Thu, 27 Mar 2008 05:40:07 +0000

There is only one solution to peace in South Asia: Pakistan must stop funding and training Islamic radicals in India to carry out terrorist attacks. Pakistan was founded on the basis that Muslims can not live in India peacefully with their Hindu neighbors. The very existence of India therefore shakes its foundations. Rather than being jealous of India, Pakistan should embrace it as its elder brother and live in harmony with it.

By: bob

bob — Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:20:25 +0000

The answer to most conundrums in the middle east conflicts are “wink wink” stated agendas…follows the money.