India and Pakistan turn into good friends, and America is kept at arms’ length. Is that possible?
Diplomacy like politics is the art of the possible, and if you listen to the new voices emerging from Pakistan, there is change blowing in the wind as it makes the transition to civilian rule after nearly nine years of military leadership.
To stop the extremism and intolerance that is sweeping Pakistan, it must turn away from the Middle East and instead look to its east to rediscover a gentler, yet immensely vibrant heritage that took root in India through the centuries, Pakistan’s The News argued in an extraordinary editorial urging the country’s new leaders to respond to Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh call to transform relations into the “best ever”.
“Despite all the attempts to deny this, the reality is that Pakistanis and Indians share a great deal in common — from cuisine to wedding traditions, and of course a great deal more. Rather than tearing ourselves away from this past, which is so much a part of our present, it should be warmly embraced,” it said.
To be sure, there is an element of rebound here and it’s more the fraying relationship with the United States that is driving Pakistan into the unlikely embrace of India, rather than any new-found love for its bitter rival, as the Daily Times said, warning that forging a new relationship with India while dumping America wouldn’t work.
“From the editorials written by the newspapers one comes to the conclusion that whereas the American nexus has become anathema, Pakistan’s good relations with India are a part of the new vision.” it said.
“Somehow, it is presumed that normalising with India will get rid of our problems at home. It is also assumed that getting rid of the American friendship and its implied slavery will benefit us on the basis of our earlier normalisation with India.” But taking on America would only damage Pakistan and give it less leverage in negotiations with India, it added.
On the other side of the border there are equally insistent voices calling for faster normalisation of ties. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh is hoping to make a visit to Pakistan, a rare event by an Indian leader, at the earliest opportunity. The two sides are trying to put some agreements in place so that it doesn’t look like an image-building exercise, one for a new leader and another facing elections in India that could be as early as this November.
But of course, mirroring the sceptics across the border, there are voices of caution in India too. A day after Singh said he would try to transform relations with Pakistan, his security adviser M.K.Narayanan warned that Pakistan’s Inter Services Intelligence continued to support militant groups that had carried out attacks in Kashmir and elsewhere in India.
And those with longer memories point out that the installation of a civilian government in Pakistan historically has not been a portent of improved bilateral ties, mostly because of the need for politicians to appear strong on national defence. As an army general President Pervez Musharraf was less vulnerable than civilian politicians on that issue. The Indians are aware of the history.
So is it going to be a real detente? Or are the neighbours condemned to uneasy ties, prisoners of history?

Trackback









































27 comments so far
Previous | 2 | 1 | Next
Once in a TV debate a pakistani had remarked that “if we can be friends with India where was the need for partition” this is Pakistan for you.
- Posted by Sharath ChandraGet Real
- Posted by roku2comehttp://www.abytheliberal.com/military/in dia-pakistan-military-strength
India did not even give any chance for the Kashmiris to vote. How would they have treated Muslims of Pakistan if a Union would have formed? I know, not all people are against Muslims. But there are Extremist wings in any community. If they cannot be controlled, no two nations or communities could merge. Specially Two nations like the hindus and muslim with completely different beliefs and teachings.
- Posted by Alaa SerajRealtions b/w India and Pakistan should be kept friendly. As there will be nothing but spilling of blood by any war. Btw, if India can so easily accuse Pakistan of Mumbai bomb blasts, then Pakistan could also have accused India of the last three-day Terrorism in Karachi, but it was not. Without evidence this is being said so. Also, there could have been an Indian Union if Hindus respected Muslims. Our cultues and teachings of our religions are completely different. Muslims are a separate community, we cannot merge with Indians; more particularly, Hindus.
- Posted by Alaa SerajPakistan and India do have a lot in common. The two countries are so close together the people should be coming together and stop the quarrel. They are all humans. We all want to live and be happy at the same time. The fact that the Indian Prime minister is traveling to Pakistan to try and resolve matters is astounding. It’s about time someone tried to negotiate the situation. The two countries need to take into consideration the opposing sides ideas and thoughts. Both sides of the argument need to be considerate of the other. Pakistan is a small country and India is fairly large. It would be beneficial to both countries if India would join forces with Pakistan instead of fighting. Though both sides have hurt the other, the Indian government has been closed minded to the needs of the people of Pakistan. They have forced them out of India, condemned their religion of Islam, and tore them apart. Families were brutally murdered, and degraded; businesses were burned down, children were killed. All these things should be taken into consideration when negotiating a solution. It is not about whose image looks better; it is about justice, respect, honesty, and loyalty. The land of India and Pakistan are basically joined together. They are neighboring countries and they should be able to get along. The two countries should have a meeting with the representatives from India and Pakistan only. They should not have any outside influences at the meeting. Having outside influences will not only cause tensions, but it is completely unnecessary for them to be there. The problem started out with India versus Pakistan, and today, presently, the problem is still between India and Pakistan. I believe that Pakistan is more ethical in this argument. They didn’t have choices because they are a smaller country. Their religion is Islam in Pakistan and the majority of the Hindu- Indian population didn’t agree with the Islamic views of the Muslims that resided India. This problem has caused much heartache and has led to more fighting. It has to stop here. I agree with the title of the blog. It’s now or never.
- Posted by Neena ENC 1102Most of the civilizations in sub continent reside in Pakistani area such as Indus civilization and Harrpa and list can go on. Most of the people in these civilizations were immigrant from Central Asia or West Asia, which means simply that most of them were non-Indians. And obviously this is applies to Pakistanis in general also. Pakistani culture and especially Urdu language is a non Indian entity.
Taj Mahal was also build by Mughals who were Non-Indians and Urdu transformed from Pakistan. Pakistan is more sophisticated in its language and culture then India. Our ancestors brought civilization to India for example beautiful Islamic buildings, Ittar (perfume) Urdu language and manners.
We should learn a great lesson from Mughals who tried hard to mix Indians and Muslims but at the end they end up evaporating. Every Pakistani knows today that Urdu language is in great threat from Indian channels.
Finally, India’s history belongs to outsiders always remember.
Other reason that we should not watch Indians movies because of Kashmir is a political one. We should watch embrace every culture and society movies and shows including India’s but not at the cost of Pakistan’s own culture and language.
- Posted by Javedlanguage of babies…
…
- Posted by language of babies