Pakistan’s lawyers: recovering from the anti-climax

June 21, 2008

Lawyers protest in Rawalpindi/Mohsin RazaWith hindsight, it seems clear that a mass movement named after Mao’s Long March but also claiming Gandhi’s principles of non-violence risked disappointing its supporters.  The failure of the Long March by Pakistan’s lawyers to restore judges sacked by President Pervez Musharraf, and its dispersal last Saturday, has prompted much debate about why its leaders gave up without at least staging a sit-in.

Defence analyst Ikram Sehgal called the Long March a logistical success in its ability to garner mass support without violence, but a tactical failure. “The tactical failure of this long-lasting tremendous effort founded on great principles has become a strategic disaster for Musharraf’s opponents,” he writes in The News.  “About Pervez Musharraf, ‘with such friends who needs enemies’, one can paraphrase the saying for him: ‘With such enemies why does he need friends?’”

The blog All Things Pakistan says supporters of the Long March “are justifiably feeling let down by the grand posturing, thundering rhetoric and the subsequent retreat from agitation”. But it adds: “The lawyers’ movement is profoundly significant. It constitutes the finest historical ‘moment’ in our troubled history.”

Aitzaz Ahsan, the leader of the lawyers’ movement, writes in Newsweek  that the Long March was “an act of collective and nonviolent defiance perhaps unrivaled in Pakistan’s checkered history”.

“As the first rays of the Saturday sun streaked over Parliament, I delivered the concluding speech, and this remarkable crowd, the biggest in Pakistan’s recent history, dispersed peacefully for the trip home,” he writes. “Not a shot was fired or a pane of glass broken. Yet more than 200,000 Pakistanis had managed to make their point: they wanted their judges back.”

Yet why did the lawyers’ leaders give up without staging a sit-in that might have forced home their point? 

Was it simply poor judgment, as suggested in this piece in the Khaleej Times: “The mystery behind the decision of Aitzaz Ahsan, the man who had so successfully and so untiringly spearheaded an unprecedented campaign of lawyers and civil society, may not be unveiled in near future,” it says. “Those who saw him delivering the concluding speech to close the long march say that he was not in his usual self and was witless.”

Lawyers leader Aitzaz Ahsan (left) with former prime minister Nawaz SharifOr had the movement become too dominated by those, including former prime minister Nawaz Sharif, who were more focused on getting Musharraf out as seen in this BBC video than on restoring the judges?

It’s worth remembering that Gandhi had a habit of calling off protests if he thought they were going in the wrong direction, often irritating his own supporters in doing so. So have the lawyers avoided a confrontation in order to fight all the better another day? Or have they missed their chance?
  

Comments

Aitzaz Ahsan had his price paid, he probably waited for the tranfer of funds in his account before calling of the Long March. Mao’s Long March was successful because he was sincere with his cause and willing to die for it. Aitzaz Ahsan was also “sincere” with his cause as a means of securing the reimbursement for all his “hard work”. Successful “Momements and long marches” are run by men of character not a clown like Aitzaz Ahsan. The one thing he successfully did was to betray people he was leading.

Posted by Sherdil malik | Report as abusive
 

i think the laywers movement needs more PTI and imran khans leadership now becuse this aitzaz ahsan is not very effteive and determined leader.

Posted by mk khan | Report as abusive
 

Aitizaz Ahsan took the right decision. Even though it was hard, but it was right. Because some people wanted to attack the parliament and that would have harmed the noble cause of the long march.

He is a man of strong character and is working relentlessly for the lawyers movement.

Posted by Muhammad Rizwan | Report as abusive
 

Aitizaz Ahsan has double standard, one side he is fighting for freedom of judiciary and another side sitting in corrupt ruling party PPP leader ASif Ali Zardari meetings (NRO approved) for personal gains. He knows that judge will be never be restored at their term by PPP.

He is all making fool the innocent & poor people of pakistan. If he is sincere, first He should resign from PPP party and then join judiciary movement as member not leader and handover leadership a brave leader who can take big decision.

 

Lawyers movement can only be led by sir Aitzaz Ahsan bcoz he iz d best suitable person 4 it….
& this can only b understood by A MAN OF SENSE not by senseless n shameless creatures like u guys!!!!
who just care abt money n wat they r gettin instead 2 care abt PAKISTAN…….

 

this is a great drama
ready good
long march was the last day of this movement this drama is over now.

Posted by shahid | Report as abusive
 

Post Your Comment

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
  •