The last time I visited Kashmir, in November, I was struck by an apparent contradiction: it was more peaceful than it had been in years, at least in the capital Srinagar, and yet the overwhelming mood was one of gloom. With the peace process between India and Pakistan going nowhere, there was a sense that thousands of people had died for nothing in the violence that had convulsed the region since a separatist revolt erupted in 1989. Although the soldiers had disappeared from the streets of Srinagar, and tourists were flocking back, it retained the some of the same tinderbox atmosphere that I had known at the height of the violence. One spark, people told me, could ignite it again.
When that spark came, in the form of a land dispute between Hindus and Muslims that triggered some of the biggest protests since 1989 (you can see my last posting on this here), the surprise was perhaps not so much that it happened but that so few analysts in Delhi (or Islamabad for that matter) saw it coming.
The sheer size and unexpectedness of the protests have prompted some Indian analysts to ask a question that has been anathema in Delhi for decades: Is it time to consider giving Kashmir independence, or at least to let Kashmiris vote on their future?
“If the experience of the last two decades has taught us anything, it is that the situation never really returns to normal. Even when we see the outward symptoms of peace, we miss the alienation and resentment within. No matter what we do, things never get better, for very long,” writes Vir Sanghvi in the Hindustan Times.
“I reckon we should hold a referendum in the Valley. Let the Kashmiris determine their own destiny. If they want to stay in India, they are welcome. But if they don’t, then we have no moral right to force them to remain. If they vote for integration with Pakistan, all this will mean is that Azad Kashmir will gain a little more territory. If they opt for independence, they will last for about 15 minutes without the billions that India has showered on them. But it will be their decision,” he writes.
“Whatever happens, how can India lose? If you believe in democracy, then giving Kashmiris the right to self-determination is the correct thing to do. And even if you don’t, surely we will be better off being rid of this constant, painful strain on our resources, our lives, and our honour as a nation? This is India’s century. We have the world to conquer -the other- and the means to do it. Kashmir is a 20th century problem. We cannot let it drag us down and bleed us as we assume our rightful place in the world. It’s time to think the unthinkable.”
The Times of India runs an editorial along similar lines. ”I was once hopeful of Kashmir’s integration, but after six decades of effort, Kashmiri alienation looks greater than ever. India seeks to integrate with Kashmir, not rule it colonially. Yet, the parallels between British rule in India and Indian rule in Kashmir have become too close for my comfort,” writes columnist Swaminathan Aiyar.
“We promised Kashmiris a plebiscite six decades ago. Let us hold one now, and give them three choices: independence, union with Pakistan, and union with India. Almost certainly the Valley will opt for independence. Jammu will opt to stay with India, and probably Ladakh too. Let Kashmiris decide the outcome, not the politicians and armies of India and Pakistan,” he concludes.
For two such reputable columnists to make a suggestion like this in national newspapers is extraordinary. India has long maintained that Kashmir is an integral part of the country. It has argued that giving up Kashmir would encourage secessionist movements elsewhere in the country and undermine its commitment to secularism by acknowledging that Kashmir, as a Muslim-majority region, could have special treatment. And it has traditionally blamed Pakistan for stirring up trouble in the region, convinced that if only Islamabad could be persuaded to end what it called “cross-border terrorism”, the benefits of Indian democracy and financial support would eventually win the people of Kashmir over.
Of course, a couple of op-eds calling for a plebiscite in Kashmir does not mean it is going to happen. The issue is phenomenally complicated, not least because the much-vaunted U.N. resolutions passed in 1948 calling for a referendum were meant to apply to the whole of the former kingdom of Jammu and Kashmir, now divided between India, Pakistan and China. The people were to be given the choice between acceding to India or Pakistan, but not of independence; while the resolution also required that Pakistan withdraw its troops first from its side of the region, followed by the bulk of the Indian forces, before a plebiscite were held.
And any vote, even within the Indian part of the former kingdom, could stir up bitter divisions between and within the three regions that make up the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir – Hindu-dominated Jammu, Muslim-dominated Kashmir and Buddhist- dominated Ladakh — that would dwarf the recent protests. Pakistan would also be faced with tough choices over how to handle the people on its side of the former kingdom, including Azad Kashmir and the strategic Northern Areas.
However, they do suggest a new thinking in India, which, determined to win its place as a global player on the political and economic stage, no longer wants to be dragged down by the Kashmir conflict. The question is whether this new thinking — coming at a time when Pakistan is struggling to reinvent itself as a civilian democracy — could contribute to a genuine effort towards a durable peace. Or will it simply make an intractable problem even more complicated?

Trackback









































112 comments so far
Previous | 6 … | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | Next
All the people have become experts on J&K suddenly, but does anyone have the guts to say that Jammu has been wronged all these 61 years in the name of alienation? Does anyone have the courage to call everything that is happening in Kashmie anti national? They are openly proclaiming to be Pakistanis, on national news channels they shout about thier identity crisis but does any of the news service or Govt of India have the guts to call them wrong without blaming the Jammuites, or arrest them for doing so? You all have hurt the nationalists sentiments of us the Jammuites without asking us why we had suddenly refused to take anymore of supression in the name of keeping kashmir with India. If after 61 years our generation x doesnt want an unsafe future with Kashmir do they have to be ignored? What slogan should they shout to be heard in the elite press and the parliament if not Bharat amata Ki Jai. We have fought Indias battle too long and were still divorced by them.
- Posted by NeeruWell…. I read the entire blog from top to bottom and understood well the situation. Here are few comments on it which I believe its quite relevant.
1. There are lots of Hindu Kashmiri pandits resides there and it will be a major threat for them after devision. They may loose their existence.
2. Every where in India we have Muslims and till date we didnt have major communal issues. So I believe being a part of India, Kashmir still can lead life happily.
3. My fear is, if Kashmir gets separated then may be some other countries will try to take over the place and will make situation bitter than now. If there is an attack today from any other country into Kashmir, we have the entire India to fight for it. But if Kashmir gets separated then they will be loosing their power.
4. As per the economy standard (as on Today) Kashmir depends upon India and vice versa. I am sure it will be a major economical fall down for Kashmir it separation happens.
Everyone is FREE to think…. and can decide to DO WHAT HE/SHE wants……
As an INDIAN I would say I can not compromise the Security of Kashmiris (what so ever the religion is) by isolating Kashmir from India. If Kashmiris feel that it will be a FREEDOM for them by separation, I believe that would be a major mistake and can make things worst.
Moreover, We the INDIANS gained our FREEDOM 61 yrs back and hence everyone is FREE today….just wondering how else ppl want to be free….
This is all about my view… and again I repeat anybody is FREE to think….
- Posted by SiddharthIn the sound and fury of this tumultous episode in Jammu and Kashmir conflict vis a vis Amarnath Land transfer and other corresponding chapters which got unvieled in the course of an emotive period of last month or so, i wonder are we missing out on something basic. Something which may be in our sub conscious but we never brought that to the fore in a way so that it could be fearlessly talked about in the context of the recent land issue itself. This is the rudimentary question which unless solved will pop its head again and again in whatever form and will hit us haunt us where it hurts most. This time it has pierced us right through the middle chalking out two antagonistic entities : Jammu AND Kashmir. Who could have imagined it was coming? And who could imagine what is coming?
Two months back when fans in valley cheered their throats out for their favourite football players during Santosh Trophy in Srinagar, many among them could not have imagined that they are unknowingly rehearsing their shouting skills later to be used for a more emotional cause. One never knows which direction the sun is going to rise the next morning.
So what have we achieved thus far? We have all seen a collosal amount of bloodshed. Even if we go by official figures, whose factuality is in question, 60, 000 Kashmiris dead is a big number. Where the hell, if hell is more terrible then this, are we heading?
Round Tables, Cross Border commineques, Trans Loc Buses, CBM’s, decrease in voilence in the valley, incresae number of tourists, development and tulip gardens, no doubt we have seen and heard this all. But ironically when all this is seen through the prism of the recent events, it seems a no no. A sham. A BandAid put many times over a rotten festering cancer. It is not gonna heal. All exercises of the past to achieve the most cherised a desire called peace has been flushed down the drain. Infact situation is more bleaker then ever. So what is the upshot? Why are we befooling ourselves?
India achieved its Independence from Britian. It costed many lives. She had to fight a pitched battle on all fronts to attain her freedom.She did.The stink of colonial opression and the fragrance of yet to be achieved freedom drove every child of her land to march for a greater cause.I salute their struggle.But one wonders in shock, how could she oppress anyone else? How could a nation freshly adorned with freedom quell another nations freedom? Something is wrong! 1947 is not a distant period in the history of world to be utterly forgotten by them. What collective slumber is this that they don’t dream about their colonial masters dragging them to daggers…stirring them out of sleep. Or is this collective amnesia of Indian masses borne of sheer naivity. Can’t be! Or may be because they are hugely pre occupied with their lives in the new India which,once born out of the blood of their great martyrs,is coming of age in this huge rush of Globalization. Could be!
So who is the opressor? Who do i intend to stir to action with this piece of write up? Majority of my friends are from Delhi. In tangible terms they don’t have any holding on my life.Nor do i have on theirs.They even empathise when we discuss kashmir. They don’t see themselves as my opressors. Nor do i see them as my opressors.
Their are hundreds and thousands of such Indians who we share our lives with , in work, in sport, in mundane conversations.In such dealings which happen every day, no one is opressor and no one is an opressed. It is just two human beings. But who then is the opressor? No doubt, their is someone. Why then is Kashmnir still burning? And the policies and laws that catalyses this chaos is but enacted by someone. But who is that someone? Which minority is this among the Indian masses who even common Indians can’t trace and who don’t want to see us happy?
It is a moral question which a common Indian has to answer for himself and herself.
A common India has to shun the myopic glasses on his eyes through which he sees his country.No doubt India is expanding economically like the stretch of a baloon ready to rise high up in the sky, but if the odd blotches on its surface are not doctored, it will burst mid air. It is not the Kashmir Issue alone, but infallible disparity between its rich and poor where rich are getting richer and poor poorer, issues of north-east, growing naxalism and maoism, forgotten muslims of India who are left behind in its development race, and many more blotches which poke on her face mockingly.
We don’t know which direction the sun is going to rise next morning. And in our curious wait for tommorow’s dawn wherein we hope to put all our issues to rest and build peace, i wonder, what if we are engulfed by the darkness of this night never to come out of. For in utter darkness they won’t even be able to put shallow bandaids on this cancer.
- Posted by suhail akramsuhail akram….
this one is for sofi,
well thats a very gud statement when it comes to united kashmir,infact nobody is stopping you from doing that?along with being united with its ownself it should not forget that it has to remain united with its own origin as well!!!!
this is one for vedan:-
how could you say that (Just for sake of saying a big diversified country, who is going to benefit from this kind of arrangement?)well the one who is going to get benefitted is you yourself.
Just by naming youself as united states of india or united kingdom does not make our economy and welfare any better.its like if you wanna be rich and properous you just name your self as Mr.tata or Mr.birlas,Mr.Bill gates or may be even ambanis.and check out for your self.Does naming yourself like this changes you present individuality and economic status.obiviously not!!!!!!
I am married to an army officer who is presently serving in Kashmir.He is been striving hard along with his men everyday to solve the social crisis in Kashmir.So i dont want at any cost that the efforts what my husband and his men have put should go in vain.
For you probably its just an article written on kashmir crisis to which you are writting down a blog casually,but for me this is a matter of my husbands contribution,pride,commitment towards his country and most important of all that invaluable time away from his beloved family.So plz think 1000 times before you think of a independent kashmir or gifting kashmir just fo no sake to our not so worthy neighbours.
- Posted by ShikhaI think what India fears the most in giving Kashmiris a plebiscite is that even if they choose to remain a free nation or become a part of Pakistan,the issue of Pakistan still continuing to pester us remains. What guarantee is there that Pakistan’s state sponsored terrorism will end.For all you know…Himachal and Punjab will become sensitive areas. In an ideal situation I would love to see Kashmir to be independent and I am sure India would love to help an independent Kashmir grow but like Bangladesh,which is slowly becoming another hub for anti india terrorist trainings,India cannot afford to see Kashmir go that way as well. Pakistan is currently unstable and never has as such managed to become a true democracy…and that can be scary
- Posted by Robin Jacob AbrahamKashmir wants freedom gives them freedom, what is the benefit of being a big united Nation without unity
- Posted by vendanJust for sake of saying a big diversified country, who is going to benefit from this kind of arrangement?
Let us be Declare ourselves us United States Of India or Like United Kingdom. That will be better for Economy and welfare of the People.
No India No Pakistan only United Kashmir is our aim
- Posted by sofiThats just rediculous to listen to people when they say its better that we leave the most beautiful integral part of india on to their own, for the heck of getting rid of the problems that are presently happening in kashmir.Do we really understand what are we doing by thinking on the terms of giving kashmir independence????well if this happens then after some decades we’ll see every single land being independent with no sense of social responsibility,with no one to lay down the rules and even to follow them at the same times.India is a country know for its unity in diversity…and if every single diverse state starts thinking on the verge of being independent then what will happen to our great land INDIA.
Its very easy for the people to sit in the warm visinity of the 4 walls and think of getting kashmir independence.But for those who are sitting on the LOC of India striving hard for years to keep this beautiful part of the country intact to india ask them?, they perhaps will be in the right position to tell why kashmir should not be independent and why it should not be handed over to pakistan.
I just pray to god that,Let not the efforts of these people go waste,who choose to live away from their families & serve their nation on the LOC.
And for those who think of creating an independent kashmir or letting kashmir in pakistans hand,PLease think again…..coz we indians will never let this happen!!!!!!!!!!Jai Hind!
- Posted by ShiikhaDespite polls that CNN-IBN along with Express carried out just recently revealing over 87 percent of Kashmiris opt for Independent State and ‘worldopinionpoll.org’ too finding almost the same statistics, the oppressor continues to misinform its people.
These polls clear all the confusions among Indian audience that Kashmir wishes to remain single and not with either of the two countries, claiming half of it each.
Back to early 1990s, Kashmiri struggle was purely indigenous and it should have had seen the support of Kashmiri Pandits, but they backtracked and left the valleyties forever. No doubt 209 Pandits were killed (express reported it), but what about 90,000 Muslim Kashmiris. Moreover, what about 506 Muslim civilians who were killed after being hit my troopers’ vehicles only?
Pandit organisation ‘Roots in Kashmir’ might claim to have been thrown out of valley and subjected to genocide, what about those Muslim Kashmiris who remained here and bore the maximum brunt of the slaughter. If 209 is genocide, then 506 and 90,000 are huge figures. “Roots in Kashmir’ should also talk about that. Remember here in Kashmir, Muslim Kashmiri participate in the pandit Kashmiri marriages and make sure to provide every facility to them.
We have here the two letters by Kashmiri pandits, who have exploded the myth propagated by the pandits in Jammu regarding their situation and Amarnath land row. And one has even said that eratwhile SASB headed by SK Sinha was an ‘eco-terrorist organisation’.
They are airing their views that ‘Panun Kashmir has been hijacked and hell bent on dividing the region on communal lines’. And they does say that a particular party collected millions of dollars in our name all over world and distributed plastic buckets to our people living in camps only for media coverage.
In Kashmir, despite protests and bandhs, not a single yatri was harmed. Over six lakh visited this year only breaking the record of 3.2 lakh the previous year. Right wing Hindus always ask about Kashmir’s hajj quota. It is just 6600 this year and hangs around the same figure each year. However, yatris come in swarms as if on picnic. For last 160 years, no restriction has been imposed on their flow. The Malik family who discovered the cave and Kashmiri pandits who would look after the cave and yatris were banished from handling the yatra affairs.
However, right wing Hindus worry all Indians that annual yatra is in trouble, but all pilgrims should understand that Kashmiri land belongs to Kashmiris and the yatra is going on for the past 160 years. Even Hindus in Jammu blocked the highway, Kashmiris shouldered 0.6 million yatris on their backs to the cave.
Most of the yatris come from central India, Maharashtra and Delhi, so what was aching to Jammunities. It needs to be seen from all perspectives. Land transfer should have been there problem too but why Jammu being pushed on front line by the rightwing Hindus. Is not it the vote bank politics to earn votes and kill Muslims from as many as bullets the so-called security forces present here have. And to make us economically backward by blocking the only route to ‘ integral part’ which has already seen 500 crore loss in business.
It needs a better understand on what happens when a son in the family wishes to part from his father or mother. Well he is given his share of the property and he leaves. Likewise, democracy is like a family. If Kashmir wants freedom, then what is wrong in that?
It is all about what one likes and what one does not. Right wing Hindus cannot force Kashmir to accept things neither can they push Kashmir for what it does not want under the guise of social equality and democracy.
But here people have already surrendered the word ‘Democracy’. Have you.
http://www.umarblogs.blogspot.com
- Posted by umarblogsWhy does India give subsidies to Muslims to go to Makkah? It is ONLY required that a Muslim go to Makkah if he can afford it on his own, according the Koran. Whay does the Government give Muslims shelters that they can use all year and when the government tries to do the same for Hindua the Muslims go WILD???
Kashmir should not be allowed to leave the Indian Union without all Indians having a say. It is NOT up to just the Muslim Kashmiris as there are hindus and Budists living in Kashmir too.
Maybe India should look at getting many more Hindus to relocate to Kashmir in order to change the demographics.
- Posted by wade sabeanI am 30 years - So called the newer generation who according to you is open to taboo question of plebiscite in Kashmir. This is not the case. The media is biased.
Kashmir will not be handed to Pakistan on a platter. Let them fight for it.
- Posted by AchimusI beleive only a very small minority in the Kashmir valley want to merge with Pakistan. Given the opportunity Pakistan would give the Kashmir a lot of FDI, FDI from ISI for creating terrorist training camps.
It is better to allow the Kashmiri pandits to come back and stay within India and trade with neighboring regions. I think only a minority in Kashmir valley are against the return of pandits but terrorists from the other side of the LOC have implemented religious cleansing.
I am fed up with BJP rhetoric on minority appeasment, what happened in Gujarat certainly was not appeasment but to Modis credit nothing like that has been repeated since.
Lets face it is a hard to be a minority anywhere in the world. Though in India people try to be secular.
I agree with the sentiments of Qasim lets bury old wounds and develop the region.
Its not my intention to denigrate pakistan with my terrorist training camp remark, sadly the comment is an accurate one.
- Posted by NarayanAs a Pakistani,I want to say that noone in my country is interested in Kashmir,or interested in fighting for Kashmir.It is a mere ideology,a concept that exists in our mind & I am sick of the army & politicians on both sides of the border making a big deal of it.Let it be independat,& let the subcontinent move forward & bury old woulds.
PAKISTAN ZINDABAD
- Posted by Qasim AwanFreedom of speech is what the biggest ailment we are suffereing from.
Really the op-eds or the knowledgeable indian coloumnists, driving luxury cars and and dinning in five stars ,have shown that for the sake of writing something, in weeklys or dailys they can write anything about any subject affectting the millions and billions of peoples of india, and kashmir.
I am surprised at the ease with which they are proposing independence or sesession or referendum.
” Kashmir has the majority of muslims, it should be with Pakistan” is a stupid assumption.
The referendum in Kashmir after the exodus of Kashmiri Pandits, by terrorists, can not be fair and is a stupidity.
It will be same if Indian hindu extremist release a fatva against the Muslims in valley and ask them to flee or die.
And then we talk about the referendum.
Kashmir is a integral part of india , if we accept the pakistani demand, tomorrow , punjab, North east, south, and andhra and every state will do so.
We have to stop being soft hearted on every issue,at least related to border disputes. which threatens the very existence of our being.
- Posted by amarit is a really interesting discussion.
i would like to first of all like to tell the details of the
problem of the land transfer which is as follows:
IT IS IMPORTANT TO KNOW THE FACTS AND THE REASONS OF OPPOSING LAND TRANSFER TO AMARNATH SHRINE BOARD BY THE COMMITEE SET UP BY DIVERSE GROUPS IN KASHMIR WHICH INCLUDES TRADE BODIES AND CIVIL SOCIETY HEADED BY EMMINENT LAWYER MR MAIN ABDUL QAYYUM.
THE MOST IMPORTANT QUESTION IS :
WHY AMARNATH SHRINE BOARD REQUIRES LAND?
AS PER STATE GOVT AS WELL AS THE SHRINE BOARD TO PROVIDE PROPER FACILITIES.
WHAT FACILTIES A PILGRIM WILL REQUIRE?
ACCOMODATION,FOOD ,TRANSPORT & OTHER FACILTIES LIKE DRINKING WATER AND LAVATORIES.
ACCOMODATION:
THE AMARNATH SHRINE BOARD SAYS THAT THE ACCOMODATION IS TO BE CREATED IN THE FORM OF TENTS AS WELL AS TEMPORARY HUTS.THE LAND IF IT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS AND AS PER THE GOVT COMMITEE TO DECIDE ABOUT THE DURATION AND NO OF PEOPLE TO VISIT THE AMARNATH HAS FIXED IT OF 1 MONTH AND NOT MORE THAN 5000 PER DAY THEN THE TOTAL SHOULD BE NOT MORE THAN 150000 IN NO.
THE PRIVATE SECTOR IN BOTH PAHALGAM AND SONMARG HAVE THE CAPACITY TO CATER TO THIS IN TOTALITY AND IF THERE ARE EXTRA SPACE NEEDED THE PRIVATE SECTOR IS CAPABLE OF PROVIDING TENTS WITH THIER EXPERTISE AND THERE IS NO NEED FOR LAND TO BE TRANSFERRED ON THIS ACCOUNT.
IT MAY NOT BE OUT OF PLACE TO MENTION THAT THE LAND IN BALTAL PRESENTLY BEING USED BY THE AMARATH SHRINE BOARD IS OWNED TO THE EXTENT OF 385 KANALS BY VILLAGERS OF NILIGRATH WHO HAVE EVEN THIER BURIAL GROUND THERE.
THE AMARNATH SHRINE BOARD HAS CREATED PERMANENT STRUCTURES AT BALTAL CAMP THE PHOTOGRAPHS OF WHICH WE HAVE AND WERE DISTRUBUTED IN THE PRESS CONFERENCE.
IS THE LAND TO BE GIVEN TO AMARNATH SHRINE BOARD TO TAKE OVER THE BUSINESS OF ACCOMODIATION FROM THE PRIVATE SECTOR OR FOR OTHER REASONS LIKE CREATING PERMANENT STRUCTURES FOR SOMETHING ELSE.
FOOD:
THE CONCEPTS OF FREE LANGARS IS IN SIKHISM AND THERE ARE ENOUGH PEOPLE TRAINED TO MAKE VEGETARIAN FOOD AND WHAT IS THE IDEA OF BRINGING IN HUNDREDS OF FREE LANGARS TO BALTAL AS WELL AS PAHALGAM AND BECAUSE OF THIS ASK FOR LAND TO GIVE FACILITATION TO PILGRIMS WHILE THE PRIVATE SECTOR IS CAPABLE OF DOING IT.
TRANSPORT:
TRANSPORT IS BEING DONE BY PILGRIMS BY BUSES ,TAXIS,PONIES,LABOURERS,HELCOPTER SERVICE.
THE J&K GOVT HAS ALLOWED OUTSIDE VEHICLES INCLUDING BUSES AND TAXIS ALTHOUGH IN LADAKH THE BUSES AND TAXIS OF KASHMIR OR JAMMU FOR THAT MATTER ARE NOT ALLOWED TO PLY WITHIN LEH .
FOR THS FACILTATION NO LAND IS REQUIRED.
IN CASE OF PONIES THE AMARNATH SHRINE BOARD CHARGES MONEY FROM THE OWNERS AND FOR THIS ALSO THEY WOULD NOT REQUIRE LAND.
IN CASE OF HELICOPTER SERVICE THERE IS LAND REQUIRED BUT AS PER ENVIRONMENTAL EXPERTS IT IS DETERMINTAL FOR THE LINGAM ITSELF AND THE OPERATION OF THIS FACILITY SHOUD BE WITH THE GOVT AS THE AIR SPACE IS OWNED BY THE GOVT AND NOT THE AMARNATH SHRINE BOARD.
OTHER FACILTIES LIKE LAVATORIES:
THIS IS ONE FACILTY WHICH WILL REQUIRE LAND BUT NOT IN CONTINUITY AND EVEN IF 100 SUCH FACILITIES ON EACH SIDE ARE CREATED IT WILL NOT REQUIRE 50 KANALS AND THAT ALSO NOT IN CONTINUITY.
THIS COULD BE DONE BY NGO AND THEY HAVE TO BE TEMPORARY IN NATURE AND NON POLLUTING.
ANOTHER IMPORTANT ISSUE IS DURATION.
DURATION:
WE OPPOSE THE DURATION BECAUSE OF THE FACT THAT THE AREA OF AMARNATH CAVE IS A PART OF THE HIMALAYAN RANGE ON WHICH DEPENDS OUR FORESTS,WATER,TOURISM,WILDLIFE .AROMATIC PLANTS AND HERBS.
IT IS HIGHLY FRAGILE AREA AND WE FAIL TO UNDERSTAND WHY IN THIS CASE OUR ENVIRONMENTALISRTS ALL OVER INDIA ARE QUIET WHILE AS THERE WAS NO OBJECTION IN THE CASE OF GANGOTRI IN UTTARKHAND WHERE THE NO OF PILGRIMS HAVE BEEN RESTRICTED.
OTHER IMPORTANT ISSUES:
WHEN THE AMARNATH YATRA IS ON IT IS NO GO AREA FOR TOURISTS AND EVEN LOCALS THEREBY PRACTICALLY TAKING OVER OF PAHALGAM AND SONMARG .IF THIS YATRA IS EXTENDED FOR ONE YEAR THEN THESE TWO PRIMARY TOURIST RESORTS ARE NOT AVAILABLE TO OUR TOURISM SECTOR.
THE FEARS:
1)TAKING OVER OF SONMARG AND PAHALGAM
2)IN ONE OF THE PRESS REPORTS THE CEO DR ARUN KUMAR IS ON RECORD TO MENTION THAT THE AMARNATH SHRINE BOARD CAN GENERATE ELECTRICITY ALSO TO FACILITATE THE PILGRIMS.IMAGINE BY TRANSFER OF LAND THE CONSTRUCTION OF DAMS AND CONTROLLING OUR LIDDER AND SINDH RIVERS .
3)WHEN WHOLE OF SONMARG AND PAHALGAM ARE TAKEN OVER THERE IS POSSIBILTY OF CHANGING THE DEMOGRAPHY OF OUR STATE PARTICLURALY KASHMIR
now the people of kashmir want thier right of self determination and they will not be kept by india just because of other muslims are in india who remained of thier free will in india after partition or just because india cannot hold together just because indians have a false notion of secularism just because they have kashmir.
- Posted by mubeen kashmiriwe kashmiris have suffered with low investements because of pending settlement ,our tourism has suffered now our horticulture and kashmir can survive by just tapping its water resources for power which is like oil.
let it be like switzerland wth both countries having access and kashmir can be a free zone with an international financial centre and be zone of peace for the whole region with everybody able to come.
My impression of the article- An irresponsible and extremely flawed reasoning on several counts. If we hold a plebiscite, as the author of the article suggests we do, we could be walking down a path fraught with risks.
1. We will certainly lose the whole of the Valley, which might be acceptable to some, but will Jammu as a whole opt to stay with India?…I think we’ll lose substantial parts of that part as well and even if Jammu stays with us, will the muslim population of Jammu stay out of trouble..and for how long?
2. Our giving in at this stage will bolster the morale of Insurgent groups across the North East and that of the Naxalites and could potentially open up the country to a host of secessionist movements.It will certainly be a shot in the arm to radical Islamic outfits and will be a Godsend to the ISI in Pakistan which would like nothing better than to oversee the Balkanisation of India.
3.The Author himself proclaims that Kashmir will not last ‘15 minutes’ without the financial support of India. Does he then wish to see an impoverished, radicalised territory next door to India which will be controlled by a host of mullahs and warlords all running terrorist training camps , where we will have no control whatsoever?..we heaved a sigh of relief when Musharraf narrowly prevented that from happening to Pakistan - so should we let that happen in Kashmir?
4. What of all the officers and Jawans who gave their lives in all these decades defending Kashmir - are their sacrifices to go in vain?
I say all this not with the sentimentality of someone who served in the armed forces but out of a belief that if we waver at this juncture and take hasty knee-jerk decisions, generations of Indians to come will pay for it in blood. This is the time to grit our teeth, take strong measures, let passions die down and take decisiona from a position of strength.
- Posted by Kiran RThis is really an irony that most of us including the auther have failed to realise that the movement in Jammu region is not directed against a religion, a region or mererly for the sake of 100 acres of land , it is rather a movement of the masses against the politicians who have no dignity or moral values and and are misleading and propelling their own people to disaster. People of Kashmir have failed to look after what the Maharajas of Dogra empire had left for the people of Jammu and Kashmir. You all need to broaden your knowledge of history of Jammu and Kashmir!
- Posted by bharatIf you give away Kashmir because a small group of Muslims cannot live in a secular pluralistic society,
I as a Tamil, want my Tamil Nadu (Tamil county) too
Manny
- Posted by MannyIt is never too late to let the People decide what they want. Lets not loose our democrtic soul in the fear of loosing a part which wants to part. Now living is Florida, USA for fourty years, hailing from a Kashmiri Pundit family, I was born in Lahore from a migrant family from India. In all honesty my parents regreted the move till death. But truthfully just like the fanatic Muslims a lot is to be blamed on the fanatic Hindus as well. But over all the Indians are a lot tolerant folks than Pakistanis and that is becomeing more and more popular with time, thanks to rational thinking. Mix culturs like India thrive only on secular principls. The problem with Pakistan is, it is 96% Muslims who are misguided Muslims fundamentaly trusting the distorted translated versions of todays Muslim religion which is contrary to the original Islamic teaching of freedom of thought. Actually/Factually speaking the role of a religious Pundits/ Mullahs Pyramid was shattered by Original Islam and getting the enlightenment from the Quran was to be upto the individuals, but today that freedom of thought has long been forgotton. I hope the Kashmiri’s if given a chance to choose, choose for Independence as a whole country and choose to be a secular state. The alternative choice to join Pakistan will be just devastating for their economy and their rich culture and they will regret it. To be the foremost will be the slaughter of the still somewhat intact freedom of 1/2 of the Kashmiri Women. In my opinion, India with all its limitation of discrimations at all levels is marching forward where as the Muslim world in general and Pakistan in Particular is sliding fast in the Dark ages of Islam. I agree that India is bogged down with Kashmir. Good Luck.
- Posted by Nader Junaid[...] seems to be taking the issue with the seriousness it deserves. Here is an interesting article. Pakistan: Now or Never? Blog Archive Breaking the taboo, Indian op-eds suggest Kashmir plebiscite | … Originally Posted by Vir Sanghvi “If the experience of the last two decades has taught [...]
- Posted by The Jammu and Kashmir Crisis thread - Page 2 - FunEnclave