Comments on: Russia points to Dawood Ibrahim in Mumbai attacks

By: Peace

Peace — Thu, 25 Dec 2008 20:13:49 +0000

FBI recommendation:
india should first find its black sheeps, fingure pointing any other country does not obsolve ones responsibility to protect its citizens. source New Dehli Times.

By: Saf

Saf — Wed, 24 Dec 2008 18:18:33 +0000

It should be relatively easy to find Dawood Ibrahim…just look for the great ex-cricketing legend Javed Miandad! After all his son’s married to Dawood’s daughter…lol.

By: Vijay

Vijay — Wed, 24 Dec 2008 16:24:57 +0000

Just read in REDIFF that Pakistan was close to working a deal with India on Dawood handover, but he seems to be protected by the CIA since he is involved with many dealings with them.Is there any truth ?

By: Peace

Peace — Wed, 24 Dec 2008 06:19:26 +0000

The photo is from indian website and it termed it as surrended, as the super liar you cannot be trusted.

The photo is not of surrender but of the agreement when india aided in separation of One Pakistan into two countries – Pakistan and Bangladesh. It was the agreement for release of Pakistani POWs arrested in Bangladesh (then part of Pakistan). It was indian conspiracy that resulted in division of Pakistan. India has always have many cruel intentions towards Pakistan – infact india is afraid of Pakistan. People in west Pakistan was missguided and now have become an informal slave to india – this is what india want for Pakistan – but will never acheive this aim.

Long live and prosperous Pakistan.

By: Victor

Victor — Wed, 24 Dec 2008 01:52:22 +0000

December 23rd, 2008
8:26 pm GMT – Posted by Peace

========================
HA HA H HAH HHAH HAHAHA. Very funny. Luckily there is a photograph of Paki army signing the surrender to Indian army in 1971. Otherwise you will deny Paki army ever surrendered to Indian army. (Or are you still denying that too? ha hah hah ha ha.

http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/1971/Dec16 /Surrender1.jpg

Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott who worked in the Clinton administration in 1999 has written a book where he gives details of events of 1999. He gives a very unflattering description of Pakis, how they begged Clinton to bail them out. Clinton said “no Get the hell out and withdraw the troops”.

By: Peace

Peace — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 20:26:22 +0000

There is a misconception among idiots that Pakistan has been defeated in all four wars with india. The super liars had been defeated by Pakistan in 1965 and one of Pakistan super pilot destroyed five indian jets in one minute, when india attacked Lahore without prior notification. In 1971 there was no war, it was war within Pakistan resulted in separation of west Pakistan, and that was done by the cruel intention of india and its R&AW intelligence agency. During Kargil Incident then indian PM went to USA for begging the piece from Pakistan, and Pakistan leave that position on its own on instruction of Bush, look at statistics which side got more dead soldiers. The first war was created by Hindu created cast sikhs – cast whose main objective is to protect hindus – when then genocide millions of muslims migrating to the independent and true country of peace.

Mumbai attacks are self created and there exist lots of evidences particularly the arrest of two men and then identified as states personnel, further there exist no corroborating evidence to Pakistan or any Pakistani link to that incident – Why so far evidence is provided to either Pakistan or anyone else in the world.

India had previously threaten to attack Pakistan, but now feared away. WHY? INDIA HAS WHOLE LIES AND NO TRUTH

By: Kashif

Kashif — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:25:25 +0000

War War War War….I suppose no one realizes the devastation it will bring to people-POOR people-in both countries…

Good luck with the FASCINATION with war….everyone just have to sit down and think deeply WHO will actually gain from the devastation….the very people who both countries are fighting with….

GOD help us all….

By: Taimur

Taimur — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:27:40 +0000

Just saw live interview of Interpol guy (chief probabbly) Ronald K. He has said that Indians have given them no solid or conclusive evidence regarding Mumbai attacks linkage with Pakistan.

India is acting as Judge, jury and executioner. And Dawood’s son got married in Dubai. So why can’t he be there.

By: Anup

Anup — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:06:24 +0000

Myra, it’s somewhat like America demanding their Alcapone from the Pakistani’s

By: Anup

Anup — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:03:39 +0000

Myra, Dawood is under the ISI patronage or detention, depending on his personal outlook, the underworld empire setup by him in Mumbai, specially the Indian western coastal smuggling network is still thriving in his name(possibly symbolically, but surely supervised by the ISI) & because the Bombay blast of ’93 are attributed to him, he’s also a great Hero amongst a particular section of Indians, India’s demand for him is simply because he’s a living evidence against the ISI hand in the ’93 blasts & know very well that the ISI will eliminate him rather than let him fall in the hands of the Indian authorities, although many a Indian politicians also wouldn’t like it…