Comments on: Pakistan and its nuclear weapons loom large over Obama administration http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/01/11/pakistan-and-its-nuclear-weapons-loom-large-over-obama-administration/ Perspectives on Pakistan Thu, 01 Oct 2015 19:31:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.5 By: Factoidz http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/01/11/pakistan-and-its-nuclear-weapons-loom-large-over-obama-administration/comment-page-2/#comment-53972 Wed, 08 Oct 2014 12:58:09 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1555#comment-53972 It’s only a matter of time, not “If”, but “when” some of their nukes will be taken and used.

]]>
By: defanalysist1 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/01/11/pakistan-and-its-nuclear-weapons-loom-large-over-obama-administration/comment-page-2/#comment-28150 Wed, 24 Mar 2010 05:19:58 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1555#comment-28150 is nuclear terrorism possible in the indian sub continent if so what p[reventive measures should ind govt take?

]]>
By: defanalysist1 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/01/11/pakistan-and-its-nuclear-weapons-loom-large-over-obama-administration/comment-page-2/#comment-28149 Wed, 24 Mar 2010 05:16:52 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1555#comment-28149 what strategy usa IS GOING TO ADOPT IN ITS RELATIONSHIP B/W INDIA PAK & AFGHANISTAN

]]>
By: defanalysist1 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/01/11/pakistan-and-its-nuclear-weapons-loom-large-over-obama-administration/comment-page-2/#comment-28148 Wed, 24 Mar 2010 05:14:06 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1555#comment-28148 what is the agenda for talks at washington dc between USA & PAK IN the ensuing week?

what role could ba assigned to gen parvez kayani in organising the agenda for talks ?

if the US pak civilian nuclear agreement comes through what willl be its security implication within PAK, in se asiaan count. particularly in india

]]>
By: defanalysist1 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/01/11/pakistan-and-its-nuclear-weapons-loom-large-over-obama-administration/comment-page-2/#comment-28147 Wed, 24 Mar 2010 05:08:08 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1555#comment-28147 what is the structured agenda for at Washington between us and pak in the ensuing week

]]>
By: haseeb http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/01/11/pakistan-and-its-nuclear-weapons-loom-large-over-obama-administration/comment-page-2/#comment-18704 Wed, 03 Jun 2009 13:20:51 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1555#comment-18704 look any body, every non muslim states like to destroy the nukeds oa pak, so its clear nobody is our frend.
2nd. every nation non muslim knos pak respect saudia snd saudia to pak. they do’t like.
3rd pakistan nukes and missiles are very effective and coorect positions which india hv’t so they all try to decontroll pakistan army isi and people as physchological pressure. we should not take any pressure listen from one ear and out from another.

by.

haseeb / 00971507256801

]]>
By: Narine Singh http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/01/11/pakistan-and-its-nuclear-weapons-loom-large-over-obama-administration/comment-page-2/#comment-14754 Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:15:10 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1555#comment-14754 The danger to the world of Pakistani nuclear bombs is ratcheted up by the day. The terrorists, including the al Queda are getting ever closer to their quarry, (they are already in Swat) and once attained, these are not for use in the MAD balance of power of the cold war years. They are intended to be used against western powers, primarily, though it will land in Mumbai as well, and other such “enemy” ports. But the primary targets remain the US, the UK, Europe and other countries.

So in the interest of national security, and since there is not much time to spare, an alliance should be established in order to remove Pakistan’s nuclear bombs, its delivery sytstems, its rogue scientists for hire, and its ISI, its terrorist groups, and help this country build its economy. Please do not wait till a nuclear armed container ship slips into a western port. The name Pakistan may be “romantic”, but the al Queda and the LeT are not. Wake up people!

]]>
By: Jeff White http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/01/11/pakistan-and-its-nuclear-weapons-loom-large-over-obama-administration/comment-page-2/#comment-12586 Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:40:38 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1555#comment-12586 RE: Pakistan Now or Never (Nuclear Weapons):
Before we put silly scenarios about Pakistani Engineers walking with material & designs, lets dig our own backyard and analyze the following “Attacks” on our own soil:

1- Anthrax Attack by Bruce Ivins, a microbiologist at the US Army Medical Research Institute for Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) at Fort Detrick, Maryland,US. 2001

2-ALMOST “Nuclear Attack”:: A US Air Force B-52 bomber was mistakenly armed with six nuclear warheads and flown for more than three hours across several US states last week (Sept. 2007), prompting an Air Force investigation and the firing of one commander, Pentagon officials.
“Nothing like this has ever been reported before and we have been assured for decades that it was impossible,” said Markey, D-Mass., co-chair of the House task force on nonproliferation. (violating US nuclear weapons handling policies that stretch back nearly 40 years)

3-Cyber Attack by Rajendrasinh B. Makwana, 35, of Glen Allen, Va. (citizen of India), designed to destroy all the data on the Fannie Mae’s 4,000 computer servers nationwide, according to federal prosecutors. 2009

4-he Oklahoma City bombing was a domestic terrorist attack on April 19, 1995 aimed at the U.S. government in which the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building, an office complex in downtown Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, was bombed. The attack claimed 168 lives and left over 800 people injured. Until the September 11, 2001 attacks, it was the deadliest act of terrorism on U.S. soil. (by 26-year-old Timothy McVeigh)

I hope you get the point !

]]>
By: Bangash Khan http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/01/11/pakistan-and-its-nuclear-weapons-loom-large-over-obama-administration/comment-page-2/#comment-11122 Sat, 24 Jan 2009 04:57:44 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1555#comment-11122 Perhaps some Indians don’t know that India still takes aid from the international community.

]]>
By: Zia http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2009/01/11/pakistan-and-its-nuclear-weapons-loom-large-over-obama-administration/comment-page-2/#comment-11012 Thu, 22 Jan 2009 05:33:51 +0000 http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/?p=1555#comment-11012 Hi Chirkut
You are factually wrong and your opinion based on wrong facts is thus a waste of time.
Firstly, muslims in india number 154 million.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_In dia

The muslim population of pakistan is $173 million. Read the full article before you speak again.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic s_of_Pakistan

So please research before you say anything, otherwise you are talking non-sense.

For Zair, there is no need to day death to india, I am pakistani i dont want harm to indians.

]]>